@article{Hocquet_2020, title={Open Science in Times of Coronavirus: Introducing the Concept of Real-Time Publication}, volume={4}, url={https://riviste.fupress.net/index.php/subs/article/view/937}, DOI={10.13128/Substantia-937}, abstractNote={<p>Who doesn’t have an opinion about hydroxychloroquine? The recent developments of the latest research in Marseilles on the potential of this antimalarial drug to reduce the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 have been heating up. Obviously, the current pandemic is a sudden and unprecedented health crisis. Unexpectedness and scale are turning the outbreak into widespread panic: science is summoned to find solutions as soon as possible. In a sense, the worldwide situation is a way of asking how fast can science go. The famed publication from Didier Raoult’s group <sup>2</sup> allows us to highlight an evolution in peer review practices, and this trend allows us to question what it means to be "open" in science.</p> <p><img style="border: none !important; box-shadow: none !important; margin: 0 !important; max-height: 1px !important; max-width: 1px !important; min-height: 1px !important; min-width: 1px !important; opacity: 0 !important; outline: none !important; padding: 0 !important; text-shadow: none !important;" src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/136397/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-advanced" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1"></p>}, number={1}, journal={Substantia}, author={Hocquet, Alexandre}, year={2020}, month={May}, pages={937} }