Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): at home is better
Articles

Stoma and tube stoma: two sides of the same coin? A scoping review

PDF
  • Alice Grandi,
  • Ilaria Ester Midea ,
  • Letizia Toscano,
  • Biagio Nicolosi
Alice Grandi
RN, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/if-2559

Published 2024-03-31

Keywords

  • Stoma,
  • Tube Stoma,
  • Neonate,
  • Nursing Care,
  • Neonatal Abdominal Surgery

Copyright (c) 2024 Alice Grandi, Ilaria Ester Midea , Letizia Toscano, Biagio Nicolosi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Introduction: A stoma is a surgical opening in the abdomen that allows for the passage of feces and/or urine. It can be temporary or permanent, and the type of stoma depends on the affected section of the intestine or urinary tract. In neonates, a stoma may be necessary for various congenital or acquired pathologies. Stoma management in this age group requires specific skills and presents different challenges compared to adults.
Aim: The aim of this review is to compare the advantages and disadvantages of stoma and tube stoma in neonates, to identify the clinical and care strategy that guarantees a better quality of life for the child and their family.
Methods: A scoping review was conducted in the PubMed and CINAHL databases. The search included studies comparing the use of stoma and tube feeding in neonates with different pathologies.
Results: Data analysis showed that: stomas offer immediate access to the intestine for feeding and decompression, but can be associated with complications such as retraction, ischemia, and peristomal dermatitis. Tube stoma allows for controlled tissue expansion of the intestine and better management of short bowel syndrome but requires more complex management and greater training of healthcare personnel.
Conclusions: The choice between stoma and tube stoma in neonates should be individualized, considering the different clinical variables and the needs of the child and their family.

PDF

References

  1. Kirkland-Kyhn H, Martin S, Zaratkiewicz S, Whitmore M, Young HM. Ostomy Care at Home. Am J Nurs. 2018; 118(4): 63-68.
  2. McGee MF. JAMA PATIENT PAGE. Stomas. Jama. 2016; 315(18): 2032.
  3. Forest-Lalande L. Best Practice Guidelines for Ostomy Care in Neonates, Children, and Adolescents: An Executive Summary. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2023; 50(5): 381-385.
  4. Elifranji M, Robinson A, Mammoo S, Zarroug A, Khalil BA. Radiologic Image-Guided Tube Stoma Insertion in Neonatal Short Bowel Syndrome: First Case Report in the Literature. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019; 29(10): 1330-1333.
  5. Coletta R, Zulli A, O'Shea K, Mussi E, Bianchi A, Morabito A. Minimizing Enterostomy Complication in Neonates, Lessons Learnt from Three European Tertiary Centres. Children (Basel). 2022; 9(2): 162.
  6. Zong Z, Zhou T, Jiang Z, Li Y, Yang B, Hou Z, Han F, Chen S. Temporary Tube Stoma versus Conventional Loop Stoma for the Protection of a Low Anastomosis in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am Surg. 2016; 82(3): 251-8.
  7. Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, et al. The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009;24:711–23.
  8. Kaidar-Person O, Person B, Wexner SD. Complications of construction and closure of temporary loop ileostomy. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201:759–73.
  9. Dabirian A, Yaghmaei F, Rassouli M, Tafreshi MZ. Quality of life in ostomy patients: a qualitative study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2010;5:1–5.
  10. Bhat S, Cameron NR, Sharma P, Bissett IP, O'Grady G. Chyme recycling in the management of small bowel double enterostomy in pediatric and neonatal populations: A systematic review. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2020; 37: 1-8.
  11. Ni ZH, Ding S, Wu JH, Wang F. Family caregivers' experiences of caring for neonates undergoing enterostomy in China: A qualitative study. Nurs Open. 2023; 10(2): 817-827.