Vol. 3 Núm. 3 (2024): simul-action for elevation
Articles

What do nurses think about telenursing? A descriptive Italian study

PDF (English)
  • Aurora De Leo,
  • Sara Dionisi,
  • Emanuele Di Simone,
  • Alessandro Spano,
  • Laura Iacorossi,
  • Albina Paterniani,
  • Gloria Liquori,
  • Priscilla Molinaro,
  • Fabrizio Petrone,
  • Marco Di Muzio,
  • Nicolo Panattoni,
  • Noemi Giannetta
Aurora De Leo
Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
Sara Dionisi
Nursing, Technical, Rehabilitation Department. DaTeR Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Emanuele Di Simone
Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri
Alessandro Spano
Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Laura Iacorossi
Department of Life, Health and Health Professions Sciences, Link Campus University, Rome, Italy
Albina Paterniani
Nursing Research Unit IFO, IRCCS Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri, Rome, Italy.
Gloria Liquori
Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
Priscilla Molinaro
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome,
Fabrizio Petrone
Nursing, Technical, Rehabilitation, Assistance and Research Direction, IRCCS Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri, IFO, Rome, Italy
Marco Di Muzio
Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Nicolo Panattoni
Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Noemi Giannetta
Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences (UniCamillus), Rome, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/if-2743

Publicado 2024-09-30

Palabras clave

  • Attitudes,
  • Barriers,
  • Descriptive study,
  • Knowledge,
  • Nurse,
  • Quantitative Research,
  • Telenursing,
  • Web survey
    • ...Más
    Menos

Derechos de autor 2024 Aurora De Leo, Sara Dionisi, Emanuele Di Simone, Alessandro Spano, Laura Iacorossi, Albina Paterniani, Gloria Liquori, Priscilla Molinaro, Fabrizio Petrone, Marco Di Muzio, Nicolo Panattoni, Noemi Giannetta

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Resumen

Introduction: Telenursing is a new nursing approach to improve continuity, quality and safety of care and patient outcomes. This study aims to describe the viewpoint of Italian nurses on their knowledge, attitudes, and barriers to telenursing.
Materials and methods: This descriptive study following the STROBE guidelines was conducted in August 2022 through a web survey. A non-validated questionnaire and convenience snowball sampling were used. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed.
Results: 323 nurses were included in the study. 75% of nurses were female, prevalently employed in hospitals (81%). Digital devices were present in 76% of healthcare facilities, but 82% of the sample had never carried out telenursing interventions. The academic training of 75% of nurses does not include telenursing education, and 93% of the sample would be interested in training on the topic, considering their previous knowledge insufficient (54%). Surveyed nurses believe telenursing could improve communication in the care team, patient safety (70%), and quality of care (45%). In nurses' opinion, patients' main barriers would be low digital literacy, use complexity and lack of resources. In addition to sharing the same barriers as patients, nurses need more skilled and exclusively assigned staff and better interconnection between the resources used.
Conclusion: In Italian nurses’ opinion, telenursing should improve the quality and safety of care and team communication. The main barriers described by the present study (lack of knowledge, resources, integration, and complexity of the tools used) suggest the need for multi-level interventions and studies to increase its use between nurses and patients.

PDF (English)

Citas

  1. Tort-Nasarre G, Espart A, Galbany-Estragués P, Álvarez B, Subias-Miquel M, Romeu-Labayen M. Experiences of telenursing in overcoming challenges and applying strategies by COVID-19 patients in home isolation: qualitative study in primary care. Healthc (Basel). 2023;11(14):2093. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11142093.
  2. De Leo A, Liquori G, Dionisi S, Petrone F, Spano A, Panattoni N, et al. Telenursing interventions for patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy: a scoping review. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2023;50(6):767-782.
  3. Levy S, Heyes B. Information systems that support effective clinical decision making. Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2012;19(7):20-22.
  4. Kamei T. Information and communication technology for home care in the future. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2013;10(2):154-161.
  5. Doraiswamy S, Abraham A, Mamtani R, Cheema S. Use of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(12).
  6. De Leo A, Liquori G, Iemulo C, Dionisi S, Giannetta N, Spano A, et al. Cancer patients and telenursing interventions in Italy: a systematic review. World Cancer Res J. 2022;9.
  7. Wehrle CJ, Lee SW, Devarakonda AK, Arora TK. Patient and physician attitudes toward telemedicine in cancer clinics following the COVID-19 pandemic. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021;5:394-400.
  8. de Wit M, Kleijnen M, Lissenberg-Witte B, van Uden-Kraan C, Millet K, Frambach R, et al. Understanding drivers of resistance toward implementation of web-based self-management tools in routine cancer care among oncology nurses: cross-sectional survey study. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(12).
  9. Basch E, Snyder C. Overcoming barriers to integrating patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice and electronic health records. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(10):2332-2333.
  10. Quinlin L, Clark Graham M, Nikolai C, Teall AM. Development and implementation of an e-visit objective structured clinical examination to evaluate student ability to provide care by telehealth. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2020;33(5):359-365.
  11. Prendergast M, Honey M. The barriers and facilitators for nurse educators using telehealth for education. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;264:1323-1326.
  12. Georgsson M, Staggers N. Quantifying usability: an evaluation of a diabetes mHealth system on effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction metrics with associated user characteristics. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016;23(1):5-11.
  13. Mair FS, Hiscock J, Beaton SC. Understanding factors that inhibit or promote the utilization of telecare in chronic lung disease. Chronic Illn. 2008;4(2):110-117.
  14. Klum M, Urban M, Tigges T, Pielmus A, Feldheiser A, Schmitt T, et al. Wearable cardiorespiratory monitoring employing a multimodal digital patch stethoscope: estimation of ECG, PEP, LVET and respiration using a 55 mm single-lead ECG and phonocardiogram. Sensors (Basel). 2020;20(7):2033. doi: 10.3390/s20072033.
  15. Alcazar B, Ambrosio L. Tele-nursing in patients with chronic illness: a systematic review. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2019;42(2):187-197.
  16. Coombs LA, Ellington L, Fagerlin A, Mooney K. Age is not a barrier: older adults with cancer derive similar benefit in a randomized controlled trial of a remote symptom monitoring intervention compared with younger adults. Cancer Control. 2020;27(1):1073274820968878.
  17. Bjorkman A, Salzmann-Erikson M. When all other doors are closed: telenurses' experiences of encountering care seekers with mental illnesses. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018;27(5):1392-1400.
  18. Fujino Y, Kawamoto R. Effect of information and communication technology on nursing performance. Comput Inform Nurs. 2013;31(5):244-250.
  19. Marco-Franco JE, Reis-Santos M, Barrachina-Martinez I, Jurewicz A, Camaño-Puig R. Telenursing: the view of care professionals in selected EU countries. A pilot study. Heliyon. 2023;9(6).
  20. Engström M, Ljunggren B, Lindqvist R, Carlsson M. Staff perceptions of job satisfaction and life situation before and 6 and 12 months after increased information technology support in dementia care. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11(6):304-309.
  21. Cornwall A, Moore S, Plant H. Embracing technology: patients', family members' and nurse specialists' experience of communicating using e-mail. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12(3):198-208.
  22. Chang JE, Lai AY, Gupta A, Nguyen AM, Berry CA, Shelley DR. Rapid transition to telehealth and the digital divide: implications for primary care access and equity in a post-COVID era. Milbank Q. 2021;99(2):340-368.
  23. Prendergast M, Honey M. The barriers and facilitators for nurse educators using telehealth for education. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;264:1323-1326.
  24. Di Muzio M, De Vito C, Tartaglini D, Villari P. Knowledge, behaviours, training and attitudes of nurses during preparation and administration of intravenous medications in intensive care units (ICU): a multicenter Italian study. Appl Nurs Res. 2017;38:129-133.
  25. Ranjbar H, Bakhshi M, Mahdizadeh F, Glinkowski W. Iranian clinical nurses' and midwives' attitudes and awareness towards telenursing and telehealth: a cross-sectional study. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2021;21(1).
  26. Yu-Tong T, Yan Z, Zhen L, Bing X, Qing-Yun C. Telehealth readiness and its influencing factors among Chinese clinical nurses: a cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2022;58:103278.
  27. Boynton PM, Greenhalgh T. Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. BMJ. 2004;328(7451):1312-1315.
  28. Tsang S, Royse CF, Terkawi AS. Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017;11(Suppl 1).
  29. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453-1457.
  30. Heckathorn DD. Snowball versus respondent-driven sampling. Sociol Methodol. 2011;41(1):355-366.
  31. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-2194.
  32. Asiri H, Househ M. The impact of telenursing on nursing practice and education: a systematic literature review. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;226:105-108.
  33. Mun M, Park Y, Hwang J, Woo K. Types and effects of telenursing in home health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Telemed J E Health. 2023;Sep 14.
  34. De Leo A, Liquori G, Dionisi S, Petrone F, Spano A, Panattoni N, et al. Telenursing interventions for patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy: a scoping review. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2023;50(6):767-782.
  35. Kim YM, Min A, Hong HC. The effectiveness of telenursing interventions on patient outcomes for colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2023;39(3):151406.
  36. Lines LM, Anderson WL, Blackmon BD, Richards K. The role of telehealth in nursing care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2022;34(3):284-293.
  37. Van Doren C, Lee R, Moen B. The impact of telehealth on nursing workforce resilience: a qualitative study. J Nurs Manag. 2023;31(3):570-577.
  38. Young C, Khan A, Dunn R. Factors influencing telehealth adoption in healthcare settings: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):845.
  39. O'Brien M, Smith G, Harlow M, Mullen D. Evaluation of a telenursing program for the management of patients with heart failure. J Card Fail. 2021;27(1):60-66.
  40. Fantini MP, D'Errico E, Squeo G. The role of telenursing in the management of chronic patients: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2020;26(3):130-139.
  41. Kuhlmann E, Jansen M, Jorritsma K. The effectiveness of telehealth interventions for patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(7):1494-1504.
  42. Lye C, Khalid A, Chandra R. Enhancing chronic disease management through telehealth: a systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2023;29(1):14604582211062836.
  43. DiGioia A, Mastrogiacomo M. Telehealth: a new frontier in nursing. Nurs Outlook. 2020;68(6):623-631.
  44. O'Donovan D, O'Brien B, O'Connell M. The role of telehealth in improving access to palliative care: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021;62(4):1100-1115.
  45. Lutz BJ, Barlow J, Campbell L. The role of telehealth in cancer care: a systematic review. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2020;47(4):400-409.
  46. Richards D, Vasilenko S, Bevan L. Use of technology in the nursing workforce: a systematic review. Nurs Open. 2020;7(3):751-762.
  47. Alharbi H, Sulaiman K, Ponnusamy K. The role of telehealth in chronic disease management: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2022;28(5):291-302.
  48. Lehtimaki K, Sainio M, Kuusisto L. The role of telehealth in improving the quality of life of cancer patients: a systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):119.
  49. Rafiq M, Shakil F, Wahab H. Telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review of the literature. Telemed J E Health. 2022;28(4):600-608.
  50. Ramos A, Llamas J, Delgado M. The role of telehealth in the management of chronic pain: a systematic review. Pain Med. 2022;23(5):937-946.
  51. Collins G, Thomas A. The impact of telehealth on mental health services: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21(1):436.
  52. Doshi D, Sharma R. Effectiveness of telehealth interventions in primary care: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract. 2021;22(1):156.
  53. Hu W, Wang S, Li L. Telehealth interventions for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2022;28(4):234-244.
  54. Melton B, Harris M. The role of telehealth in diabetes management: a systematic review. Diabetes Educ. 2021;47(5):523-535.
  55. Tranter D, de Salis I, Dowding D. Factors influencing the implementation of telehealth: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):805.
  56. Wong C, Yi K, Yew H. Telehealth in nursing education: a systematic review. Nurs Educ Pract. 2021;55:102041.
  57. Lee K, McGowan J. A systematic review of telehealth interventions for people with chronic pain. Pain Manag Nurs. 2021;22(5):511-523.