On the Limits of Comparing Subset Sizes within N
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36253/jpm-2939Keywords:
Axiom of choice, Cardinality, Density, Infinity, Limit, Numerosity, Set sizeAbstract
Wereviewandcomparefivewaysofassigningtotallyorderedsizestosubsetsofthenatural numbers: cardinality, infinite lottery logic with mirror cardinalities, natural density, generalised density, and α-numerosity. Generalised densities and α-numerosities lack uniqueness, which can be traced to intangibles: objects that can be proven to exist in ZFC while no explicit example of them can be given. As a sixth and final formalism, we consider a recent proposal by Trlifajová (2024), which we call c-numerosity. It is fully constructive and uniquely determined, but assigns merely partially ordered numerosity values. By relating all six formalisms to each other in terms of the underlying limit operations, we get a better sense of the intrinsic limitations in determining the sizes of subsets of N.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sylvia Wenmackers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Copyright on any open access article in JPM published by FUP is retained by the author(s).
- Authors grant FUP a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.
- Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
- The Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 formalizes these and other terms and conditions of publishing articles.
- In accordance with our Open Data policy, the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication waiver applies to all published data in JPM open access articles.