Vol. 1 (2024)
Articles

Distinguishing Ontological Security from Security of Identity: The Case of Russian “Relokanty” in Tbilisi in the Aftermath of the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine

PDF
  • Cesare Figari Barberis,
  • Leonardo Zanatta
Cesare Figari Barberis
Graduate Institute of Geneva
Leonardo Zanatta
Corvinus University of Budapest
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/asiac-2414

Published 2023-12-12

Keywords

  • Russia,
  • Georgia,
  • Ontological Security,
  • Identity,
  • Anxiety

How to Cite

Figari Barberis, C., & Zanatta, L. (2023). Distinguishing Ontological Security from Security of Identity: The Case of Russian “Relokanty” in Tbilisi in the Aftermath of the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine. ASIAC – Studies on Central Asia and the Caucasus (SCC), 1, 161–179. https://doi.org/10.36253/asiac-2414

Abstract

This article seeks to contribute to the burgeoning debate on ontological security (OS) in International Relations (IR), and sides with that part of OS scholarship that emphasizes the distinction between “security of identity” and “security of the self”. We empirically show the need for separating these two concepts by discussing the case of Russian relokanty in Tbilisi in aftermath of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Also due to the history of conflict between Moscow and Tbilisi, Russian relokanty in Georgia have found themselves in a strongly pro-Ukraine environment, and have thus faced various shaming attempts by some locals. This, combined with the existential crisis they already felt due to their country’s invasion of Ukraine, has ignited personal reflections regarding their sense of self and their identity. We thus conducted fifty semi-structured interviews with Russian relokanty in Georgia, and methodologically traced ontological insecurity as manifested by its “symptoms” of anxiety and feeling of limbo. We highlight the difference between the security of identity and security of the self by: (1) discussing how a majority of respondents displayed symptoms of ontological insecurity, but only a minority of them also experienced an identity crisis; (2) and showing how those respondents who did shift identity as a result of an identity crisis, ultimately failed to re-establish security of the self.

PDF

References

  1. Browning, Christopher and Joenniemi, Pertti. 2017. “Ontological security, self-articulation and the securitization of identity”. Cooperation and Conflict 52, no. 1: 31–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836716653161
  2. Browning, Christopher. 2018. “Brexit, Existential Anxiety and Ontological (In)security”. European Security 27, no. 3: 336-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2018.1497982
  3. Chervonnaia, Svetlana. 1994. Conflict in the Caucasus: Georgia, Abkhazia, and the Russian Shadow. ‎Gothic Image Publications.
  4. Della Sala, Vincent. 2020. “Narrating Europe: the EU's Ontological Security Dilemma”. In Kinnvall, Manners and Mitzen (eds) Ontological Insecurity in the European Union. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429264375-2
  5. Ejdus, Filip. 2020. Crisis and Ontological Insecurity: Serbia’s Anxiety over Kosovo's Secession. Central and Eastern European Perspectives on International Relations, Palgrave McMillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20667-3
  6. Flockhart, Trine. 2016. “The Problem of Change in Constructivist Theory: Ontological Security Seeking and Agent Motivation”. Review of International Studies 42, no. 5): 799-820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051600019X
  7. Gellwitzki, Nikolai and Houde, Anne Marie. 2023. “Narratives, Ontological Security, and Unconscious Phantasy: Germany and the European Myth During the so-called Migration Crisis”. Political Psychology 44: 435-451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12869
  8. Gerrits, Andre and Bader, Max. 2016. “Russian Patronage over Abkhazia and South Ossetia: Implications for Conflict Resolution”. East European Politics 32, no. 3: 297-313 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2016.1166104
  9. Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford University Press.
  10. Gustafsson, Karl & Krickel-Choi, Nina. 2020. “Returning to the Roots of Ontological Security: Insights from the Existentialist Anxiety Literature”. European Journal of International Relations 26, no. 3: 875–895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066120927073
  11. Gustafsson, Karl. 2014. “Memory Politics and Ontological Security in Sino-Japanese Relations”. Asian Studies Review 38, no. 1: 71-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2013.852156
  12. Huysmans, Jef. 2000. “Migration and the Politics of Security”. In: Body-Gendrot, Sophie and Martiniello, Marco. (eds) Minorities in European Cities. Migration, Minorities and Citizenship, 179-189. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62841-4_13
  13. Innes, Alexandria and Steele, Brent. 2014. “Memory, Trauma and Ontological Security”. In Resende and Budryte (eds) Memory and Trauma in International Relations. London: Routledge.
  14. Jones, Stephen. 2013. Georgia: A Political History Since Independence. I. B. Tauris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755620104
  15. Kaufman, Stuart. 2001. Modern Hatreds: The Symbolic Politics of Ethnic War. Cornell Studies in Security Affairs. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501702006
  16. Kay Sean. 2012. “Ontological Security and Peace-Building in Northern Ireland”. Contemporary Security Policy 33, no. 2: 236-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2012.693823
  17. Kinnvall, Catarina. 2004. “Globalization and Religious Nationalism: Self, Identity, and the Search for Ontological Security”. Political Psychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00396.x
  18. Kinnvall, Catarina. 2009. Globalization and religious nationalism in India: The search for ontological security. Routledge.
  19. Kinnvall, Catarina and Mitzen, Jennifer. 2018. “Ontological Security and Conflict: The Dynamics of Crisis and the Constitution of Community”. Journal of International Relations and Development 21: 825–835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-018-0161-1
  20. Krickel-Choi, Nina. 2022. “The Concept of Anxiety in Ontological Security Studies”. International Studies Review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viac013
  21. Krickel-Choi, Nina. 2022. “State Personhood and Ontological Security as A Framework of Existence: Moving Beyond Identity, Discovering Sovereignty”. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2022.2108761
  22. Krolikowski, Alanna. 2008. “State Personhood in Ontological Security Theories of International Relations and Chinese Nationalism: A Sceptical View”. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2, no. 1: 109–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pon003
  23. Laing, Ronald David. 1990. Self and Others. Penguin Books.
  24. Lupovici, Amir. 2012. “Ontological Dissonance, Clashing Identities, and Israel's Unilateral Steps Towards the Palestinians”. Review of International Studies 38, no. 4: 809-833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210511000222
  25. Millward, Louise and Kelly, Michael. 2003. “Incorporating the Biological: Chronic Illness, Bodies, Selves, and the Material World”. In Bendelow, Birke & Williams (eds) Debating Biology: Sociological Reflections on Health, Medicine and Society. London: Routledge.
  26. Mitzen, Jennifer and Larson Kyle. 2017. “Ontological Security and Foreign Policy”. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.458
  27. Mitzen, Jennifer. 2006. Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma. European Journal of International Relations 12, no. 3: 341–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106067346
  28. Mitzen, Jennifer. 2018. “Feeling at Home in Europe: Migration, Ontological Security, and the Political Psychology of EU Bordering”. Political Psychology 39: 1373-1387 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12553
  29. Narozhna, Tanya. 2018. “State–Society Complexes in Ontological Security-Seeking in Ir.” Journal of International Relations and Development 23, no. 3: 559–583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-018-0164-y
  30. Neno, Gabelia and Gurashi, Romina. 2017. A Federal Perspective on the Abkhaz-Georgian Conflict: from Intractability to Pacification. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  31. Peoples, Columba and Nick Vaughan-Williams. (2010). Critical Security Studies: An Introduction (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847473
  32. Rumelili, Bahar. 2014. Conflict Resolution and Ontological Security: Peace Anxieties. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315796314
  33. Rumelili, Bahar, and Ayşe Betül Çelik. 2017. “Ontological Insecurity in Asymmetric Conflicts: Reflections on Agonistic Peace in Turkey’s Kurdish Issue.” Security Dialogue 48, no. 4: 279–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010617695715
  34. Rumelili, Bahar. 2022, “Introduction to the Special Issue Anxiety and Change in International Relations.” Uluslararası İlişkiler / International Relations 19: 1–11.
  35. Shesterinina, Anastasia. 2021. Mobilizing in Uncertainty: Collective Identities and War in Abkhazia. Cornell University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2022.2063477
  36. Souleimanov Emil. 2013. Understanding Ethnopolitical Conflict: Karabakh, South Ossetia, and Abkhazia Wars Reconsidered. Palgrave McMillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137280237
  37. Steele, Brent. 2008. Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203018200
  38. Subotić, Jelena. 2016. “Narrative, Ontological Security, and Foreign Policy Change”. Foreign Policy Analysis 12, no. 4: 610–627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12089
  39. Zarakol, Ayşe. 2017. “States and Ontological Security: A Historical Rethinking”. Cooperation and Conflict 52, no. 1: 48–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836716653158
  40. Zürcher, Christoph. 2007. The Post-Soviet Wars: Rebellion, Ethnic Conflict, and Nationhood in the Caucasus. NYU Press.