Just Accepted Manuscript
Articles

Haunted Modernities: Ruins, Resistance and Poetics of Watery Infrastructures in Georgia

Lika Jalagania
Ilia State University
Esma Berikishvili
Ilia State University
Ketevan Lapachi
Ilia State University
Mariam Urdia
Ilia State University

Published 2026-05-28

Keywords

  • Infrastructure,
  • Post-Soviet Transition,
  • Resistance,
  • Water,
  • Georgia

How to Cite

Jalagania, L., Berikishvili, E., Lapachi , K., & Urdia , M. (2026). Haunted Modernities: Ruins, Resistance and Poetics of Watery Infrastructures in Georgia. ASIAC – Studies on Central Asia and the Caucasus (SCC). https://doi.org/10.36253/asiac-3524

Abstract

In the complex landscape of post-Soviet transitions, infrastructure in Georgia has emerged as a crucial mediator of power, identity, and social dynamics. This article examines the diverse ways infrastructure shapes and is shaped by political, ecological, and affective processes in contemporary Georgia through ethnographic case studies from Tbilisi’s Mtkvari Riverfront, the resistance movement in the Rioni Valley, and informal scrap metal economies in Poti. Drawing on theoretical insights from the anthropology of infrastructure, the research illustrates how infrastructural formations transcend their materiality to become dynamic sites of ideological expression, contestation, and everyday survival.

 

In Tbilisi, the transformation of the Mtkvari riverfront demonstrates how Soviet infrastructural legacies severed historical and ecological continuities, leaving behind landscapes marked by collective memory and estrangement.  By contrast, the Rioni Valley emphasises infrastructure as a site of political formations, where locals actively challenge state-imposed development narratives and reclaim their relational linkages to land and water. In Poti, meanwhile, infrastructural ruination has encouraged informal economic practices and created novel socio-material forms of resilience amid systemic breakdown. These diverse responses to infrastructure underline the tensions that are integral to neoliberal changes and state-driven modernisation, which are especially visible in their neglect of local knowledge, adaptive resilience, and collective attachments. By highlighting the need to see infrastructure as relational, dynamic, and affectively charged matter, this paper attempts to illuminate how marginalised spaces can become active venues for negotiating sovereignty, memory, and possibilities for alternative futures in post-Soviet Georgia.

 

References

  1. Amin, Ash. 2013. “The Urban Condition: A Challenge to Social Science.” Public Culture 25 (2): 201–208.
  2. Anand, Nikhil, Akhil Gupta, and Hannah Appel, eds. 2018. The Promise of Infrastructure. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
  3. Aroshvili, Alexandra. 2023. “The Extractive Operation on Water and Its Social Costs: An Attack on Life.” In January February March, 231–271. Publication for the Georgian Pavilion at La Biennale di Venezia. Tbilisi: Tbilisi Architecture Biennial.
  4. Barry, Andrew, and Evelina Gambino. 2024. “Projects of Transition.” Economy and Society 53 (3): 351–375.
  5. Berlant, Lauren. 2016. “The Commons: Infrastructures for Troubling Times.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34 (3): 393–419.
  6. Berardi, Franco. 2011. After the Future. Edited by Gary Genosko and Nicholas Thoburn. Oakland, CA: AK Press.
  7. Boym, Svetlana. 2007. “Nostalgia and Its Discontents.” The Hedgehog Review 9 (2).
  8. Collier, Stephen J. 2011. Post-Soviet Social: Neoliberalism, Social Modernity, Biopolitics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  9. Derrida, Jacques. 1994. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. New York and London: Routledge.
  10. Fisher, Mark. 2012. “What Is Hauntology?” Film Quarterly 66 (1): 16–24.
  11. Gordillo, Gastón. 2014. Rubble: The Afterlife of Destruction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  12. Gurchiani, Ketevan. 2023. “Rivers between Nature, Infrastructure, and Religion.” Central Asian Survey 42 (1): 21–40.
  13. Hägglund, Martin. 2008. Radical Atheism: Derrida and the Time of Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  14. Humphrey, Caroline. 2005. “Ideology in Infrastructure: Architecture and Soviet Imagination.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 11 (1): 39–58.
  15. iFact. 2021. “ნამახვანი – რას გვაკარგვინებს და რას გვაძლევს? [Namakhvani: What Does It Cost Us and What Does It Give Us?].” iFact.ge. https://ifact.ge/namakhvani/
  16. Jovanović, Deana. 2021. “Infrastructural Stripping and ‘Recycling’ of Copper: Producing the State in an Industrial Town in Serbia.” Social Anthropology 29 (3): 586–601.
  17. Kardava, Dato. 2013. მტკვარი და მისი ორი ნაპირი [The Mtkvari and Its Two Banks]. Tbilisi.
  18. Khan, Naveeda. 2006. “Flaws in the Flow.” Social Text 24 (4): 87–113.
  19. Komunisti. 1952. “Partovdeba Sakartvelos Dedaqalaqis Ketilmotskobis Samushaoebi [Improvement Works in the Capital of Georgia Are Expanding].” Komunisti 204.
  20. Larkin, Brian. 2013. “The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure.” Annual Review of Anthropology 42 (1): 327–343.
  21. Latour, Bruno. 2005. “From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik: An Introduction to Making Things Public.” In Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, edited by Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel, 14–41. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  22. Macharashvili, I. 2021. “‘ნამახვანი ჰესის’ ისტორია – რა არის მთავარი პრობლემა [The History of Namakhvani HPP: What Is the Main Problem].” Mtis Ambebi. https://mtisambebi.ge/news/ecology/item/1303
  23. Nachkebia, Nodar. 1957. Poti Ekonomikur-Georgrapiuli Narkvevi [Poti: Essay on the Economy and Geography]. Tbilisi.
  24. Niewöhner, Jörg. 2015. “Infrastructures of Society, Anthropology Of.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 119–125. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  25. Ocaklı, Beril, and Benedikt Ibele. 2023. “Georgia’s Modern (Not so Environmental) Problems: The Nature of Road and Energy Infrastructures.” In Ecological Concerns in Transition: A Comparative Study on Responses to Waste and Environmental Destruction in the Region, edited by Ninna Mörner, 133–143. Huddinge: Centre for Baltic and East European Studies, Södertörn University.
  26. Ocaklı, Beril, and Valentin Krüsmann. 2025. “Whom the Roads Bypass: Rikoti’s East-West Connections in a Disconnecting Georgia.” Mobilities: 1–21.
  27. Povinelli, Elizabeth A. 2016. Geontologies: A Requiem to Late Liberalism. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
  28. Rekhviashvili, Lela. 2022. Struggle for the Rioni Valley in between Political and Civil Society Terrains: Contested Infrastructures and Development Politics. Tbilisi: Heinrich Boell Foundation South Caucasus.
  29. Rekhviashvili, Lela, and Evelina Gambino. 2024. “Failed Infrastructures and the Promise of Development in Georgia.” Second Cold War Observatory, Dispatch 2024.4. https://www.secondcoldwarobservatory.com/dispatch-2024-4
  30. Rekhviashvili, Lela, and Thilo Lang. 2024. “Chinese Investments as Part of Infrastructure-Led Development: Multi-Scalar Contestations around Georgia’s Flagship Infrastructure Projects.” Eurasian Geography and Economics: 1–30.
  31. Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  32. ———. 2025. In Praise of Floods: The Untamed River and the Life It Brings. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  33. Social Justice Center. 2021. “Violations, Inconsistencies and Unsubstantiated Concessions: A Brief History of Namakhvani HPP Cascade Project.” https://socialjustice.org.ge/uploads/products/pdf/Namakhvani_ENG_1627034834.pdf
  34. Star, Susan Leigh. 1999. “The Ethnography of Infrastructure.” American Behavioral Scientist 43 (3): 377–391.
  35. Star, Susan Leigh, and Karen Ruhleder. 1996. “Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces.” Information Systems Research 7 (1): 111–134.
  36. Stoler, Ann Laura, ed. 2013. Imperial Debris: On Ruins and Ruination. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
  37. Sweeney, Paula. 2020. “Nostalgia Reconsidered.” Ratio 33 (3): 184–190.
  38. Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. 2003. “Natural Resources and Capitalist Frontiers.” Economic and Political Weekly 38 (48): 5100–5106.
  39. ———. 2021. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. New paperback printing. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  40. ———. 2024. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. New paperback edition with a new preface by the author. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  41. Vigh, Henrik. 2009. “Motion Squared: A Second Look at the Concept of Social Navigation.” Anthropological Theory 9 (4): 419–438.
  42. Von Schnitzler, Antina. 2016. Democracy’s Infrastructure: Techno-Politics and Protest after Apartheid. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  43. Wyeth, Ryan David. 2022. “White Coal Nation? Resource-Making, Identity, and Hegemony in the Struggle over Georgia’s Hydropower Development.” PhD thesis, Durham University.