Vol. 1 (2024)
Articles

Linguaggi urbani e istituzioni nelle tre capitali del sud Caucaso

Laura Pogliani
Politecnico di Milano
Vincenzo Zenobi
Indipendent researcher

Published 2023-12-13

Keywords

  • Tbilisi,
  • Yerevan,
  • Baku,
  • urban regeneration,
  • symbolic space

How to Cite

Pogliani, L., & Zenobi, V. (2023). Linguaggi urbani e istituzioni nelle tre capitali del sud Caucaso. ASIAC – Studies on Central Asia and the Caucasus (SCC), 1, 81–102. https://doi.org/10.36253/asiac-2419

Abstract

Interpreting the development trajectories of Tbilisi, Yerevan, and Baku requires a careful understanding of the urban policies that have shaped them from the post-Soviet period to the present. The neoliberal approach has shaped their growth, encouraging the emergence of private, including international, entrepreneurial groups and the formation of a new urban market. Still, the resulting construction of infrastructure and living spaces has followed very different paths linked to specific socio-economic contexts. The article aims to explore the similarities and differences between the cities, trying to explain the incidence of political events and economic programmes in urban regeneration and the contentious and poorly managed dialogue with residents.

References

  1. Billig, Michael. 1995. Banal nationalism London: Sage.
  2. Blau, Eve and Rupnik, Ivan. 2018. Baku. Oil and Urbanism. Zurch: Park Books.
  3. Crosnier, Nicolas. 2013. “Le nouveau visage de Bakou: une cité malade de sa richesse”, Urbanités, 2.
  4. De Waal, Thomas. 2010. The Caucasus: an introduction. Oxford, New York: Oxford University.
  5. Fauve, Adrien and Gintrac, Cécile. 2009. “Production de l’espace urbain et mise en scène du pouvoir dans deux capitales «présidentielles» d’Asie Centrale”, L’Espace Politique, 8.
  6. Ferrari, Aldo. 2007. Breve storia del Caucaso Roma: Carocci.
  7. Grant, Bruce. 2014. “The edifice complex: architecture and the political life of surplus in the New Baku”, Public Culture, 26 (3), 501-528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2683648
  8. Guliyev, Farid. 2018a. “Urban Planning in Baku: who is involved and how it works”, Caucasus Analytical Digest, 101, 2-8.
  9. Guliyev, Farid. Eds. 2018b. “Urbanization and Urban public policy in Baku”, Caucasus Analytical Digest, 101.
  10. Jafarli, Fuad. 2018. “Modernization of Baku’s Transport System: infrastructure development issues”, Caucasus Analytical Digest, 101, 15-18.
  11. Mamyan, Zaruhi. 2014. «Basic Developments in Planning of Yerevan in Master Plans» Heritage Conservation Regional Network Journal 5 URL http://rcchd.icomos.org.ge/?l=G&m=4-4&JID=5&AID=38
  12. Petrosyan, Sarhat and Topalyan, Nora 2015. “Contrivances on Araratian Street: an Ideology or an Urban Public Space”. In: Bošković, Romana; Zeković, Miljana; Milićević, Slaana (eds), Conference Proceedings. Radical Space In Between Disciplines. Novi Sad: Department of Architecture and Urbanism, Faculty of Technical Sciences. URL http://ouryerevan.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Contrivances_on_Araratian_Street_An_Ideo.pdf.
  13. Petrosyan, Sarhat (ed.). 2016. Independent Landscape. Pavillion of the Republic of Armenia. Yerevan: Mediapolis.
  14. Salukvadze, Joseph and Van Assche, Kristof. 2022. “Multiple transformations, coordination, and public goods. Tbilisi and the search for planning as collective strategy”, European Planning Studies, https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2065878 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2065878
  15. Shatirishvili, Zvid. 2009. National Narratives, Realms of Memory and Tbilisi Culture. In Van Assche, Kristof, Salukvadze Joseph and Shavishvili, Nick. Eds. City Culture and City. Planning in Tbilisi. Where Europe and Asia Meet. New York: The Edwin Mellen Press, 59-70.
  16. Spita, Leone. 2017. Trasformazioni architettoniche e urbane nello spazio post-sovietico. Il caso di Tbilisi e Baku, in: Ferrari, Aldo, et al, Eds. Armenia, Caucaso e Asia Centrale, Eurasiatica. Venezia: Edizioni Ca’Foscari. 125-137. http://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-211-6/008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-211-6/008
  17. Suny, Ronald Grigory. 2001. “Constructing Primordialism: Old Histories for New Nations”. The Journal of Modern History 73 (4), 862-896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/340148
  18. Ter Minassian, Taline. 2007. Erevan La construction d'une capitale à l'époque soviétique Rennes:Presses universitaires de Rennes.
  19. Valigi, Marco, Natalizia, Gabriele and Frappi, Carlo. 2018. Il ritorno della geopolitica. Regioni e instabilità dal Mar Nero al Mar Caspio. Novi Ligure: Epoké.
  20. Valiyev, Anar. 2012. “Baku”. J. Cities, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.11.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.11.004
  21. Valiyev, Anar. 2014 “The post -Communist growth machine: The case of Baku, Azerbaijan”. J. Cities. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.06.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.06.008
  22. Valiyev, Anar. 2016. First European Olympic games in Baku: new articulation of Azerbaijani identity? In Makarychev, Andrei and Yatsyk Alexandra. Eds. Mega events in post-Soviet Eurasia: shifting borderlines of inclusion and exclusion, (131-149) London: Palgrave MacMillian. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49095-7_7
  23. Valiyev, Anar and Wallwork, Lucy. 2019. “Post-Soviet urban renewal and its discontents: gentrification by demolition in Baku”, Urban Geography,
  24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1627147 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1627147
  25. Van Assche, Kristof, Salukvadze Joseph and Shavishvili, Nick. Eds. 2009. City Culture and City. Planning in Tbilisi. Where Europe and Asia Meet. New York: The Edwin Mellen Press.
  26. Zenobi, Vincenzo. 2019. “Le trasformazioni urbane nella Yerevan post-sovietica Note su élite, economia e retorica della continuità”. Eurasiatica 12. Ricerche 2019 a cura di Giorgio Comai, Carlo Frappi, Giovanni Pedrini, Elena Rova. Venezia: Cà Foscari. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-340-3/015
  27. Zenobi, Vincenzo. 2020. “Le trasformazioni urbane nella Tbilisi post-sovietica Note su istituzioni, modernità e spazi della città”. Eurasiatica 15. Ricerche 2020 a cura di Carlo Frappi e Paolo Sorbello. Venezia: Cà Foscari. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-453-0/010
  28. Zhvania, Ivan. 2016. “Tbilisi’s Panorama Project Is Urban Boosterism at Its Worst”. Open Democracy. https://bit.ly/33bmgP8.
  29. Zhvania, Ivan. 2020. Tbilisi, Georgia. Preserving Historic Public Spaces in a Rapidly Changing City. In: Kaw, J.K.; Lee, H. and Wahba, S. (eds), The Hidden Wealth of Cities. Creating, Financing, and Managing Public Spaces. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/33186 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1449-5_ch16