Just Accepted Manuscript
Articles

Central Asian public transport between decline narratives and authoritarian modernisation

Wladimir Sgibnev
Leibniz Institute for Regional Geography

Published 2026-07-28

Keywords

  • public transport,
  • modernisation,
  • reforms,
  • marshrutki,
  • trolleybus

How to Cite

Sgibnev, W. (2026). Central Asian public transport between decline narratives and authoritarian modernisation. ASIAC – Studies on Central Asia and the Caucasus (SCC). https://doi.org/10.36253/asiac-3527

Abstract

After the demise of the Soviet Union, economic decline, political upheaval and lack of funds led to a significant decrease in public transport provision in Central Asia. Entire systems were closed down, many more significantly curtailed. Marshrutka minibuses became the predominant feature of public transport in the region – with decline and informality as the dominant analytical lenses. However, recent developments cast doubt on this paradigm. Significant investments have been made into metro systems in Tashkent and Almaty, or into Dushanbe’s trolleybuses. Samarkand has seen the opening of a tramway system – a unique case in the entire former Soviet Union. How to make sense out of these seemingly counterintuitive developments? Based on media reports and rolling stock database analyses, the paper attempts to scrutinise current developments in the sphere of public transport in Central Asia, to complicate the post-independence decline paradigm of public transport provision, and to embed it within translocal knowledge flow circuits.

References

  1. Akimov, Alexander, and David Banister. 2011. “Urban Public Transport in Post-Communist Transition: The Case of Tashkent, Uzbekistan.” Comparative Economic Studies 53. https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.2011.18.
  2. Asiaplus. 2016. “Meriya Dushanbe za svoi schet podgotovit voditelei obshchestvennogo transporta.” https://asiaplustj.info/ru/news/tajikistan/society/20210119/meriya-dushanbe-za-svoi-schet-podgotovit-voditelei-obtshestvennogo-transporta. Accessed on April 20, 2026.
  3. Asiaplus. 2019. “Meriya Dushanbe ostro nuzhdaetsya v voditelyakh avtobusov i trolleibusov.” https://asiaplustj.info/ru/news/tajikistan/society/20210116/meriya-dushanbe-ostro-nuzhdaetsya-v-voditeley-avtobusov-i-trolleibusov. Accessed on April 20, 2026.
  4. Bittner, Christian, Boris Michel, and Ceren Turk. 2016. “Turning the Spotlight on the Crowd: Examining Participatory Ethics and Practices of Crisis Mapping.” ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 15, no. 1: 207–229.
  5. Borubaeva, Begimai, and Evgenii Muleev. 2024. “Governing ‘Green’ Public Infrastructure: The Trolleybus Case in Bishkek.” Berliner Gazette. https://berlinergazette.de/the-governance-of-publicly-owned-infrastructure-in-bishkek-the-case-of-trolleybus-demolition/. Accessed on April 20, 2026.
  6. Cima, Ondřej, and Lucie Sovová. 2022. “The End of Postsocialism (As We Knew It): Diverse Economies and the East.” Progress in Human Geography 46, no. 6: 1369–1390. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325221127295.
  7. Finn, Brendan. 2007. “Transition from Public Monopoly to Controlled Competition in a Post-Socialist Economy: Experience in the Republic of Kazakhstan.” In Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport: Selected Papers from the 9th International Conference (Thredbo 9), edited by M. Rosário et al., 659–676. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  8. Gazeta.uz. 2016a. “Tashkentskij metropoliten voshel v strukturu ‘Uzbekiston temir yullari’.” https://www.gazeta.uz/ru/2016/11/07/subway/. Accessed on April 20, 2026.
  9. Gazeta.uz. 2016b. “Tashkentskij tramvaj ushel v istoriyu.” https://www.gazeta.uz/ru/2016/05/02/tram/. Accessed on April 20, 2026.
  10. Gazeta.uz. 2016c. “V Samarkande zapustyat tramvaj.” https://www.gazeta.uz/ru/2016/10/05/tram/. Accessed on April 20, 2026.
  11. Grdzelishvili, Ia, and Roger Sathre. 2008. “Understanding the Urban Travel Attitudes and Behavior of Tbilisi Residents.” Cooperation for a Green Future Research Paper. http://www.cgf-georgia.org/Tbilisi_Transport_Behavior.pdf. Accessed on April 20, 2026.
  12. Gwilliam, Kenneth. 2000. Private Participation in Public Transport in the FSU. TWU Papers TWU-40. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  13. Gwilliam, Kenneth. 2001. “Competition in Urban Passenger Transport in the Developing World.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 35, no. 1: 99–118.
  14. Hoor, Maximilian. 2020. Mobilitätskulturen: Über die Notwendigkeit einer kulturellen Perspektive der integrierten Verkehrsplanung. IVP Discussion Paper No. 2020(1).
  15. Muktarbek uulu, Kubanychbek. 2008. “Rehabilitating the Public Transport and Modernising Traffic Rules: The Alternative Technical Framework for Kyrgyzstan.” In Techniques and Technologies for Sustainability: Proceedings of the International Conference and Summer School 2007, edited by A. Atkinson et al., 104–112. Berlin: Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin.
  16. Petrova, Maria. Forthcoming. “Personalisation of Risk and Infrastructural Care – The Transport Work on the Tram in Samarkand.” Forum IfL, Central Asian Mobilities.
  17. Rekhviashvili, Lia, and Wladimir Sgibnev. 2018. “Placing Transport Workers on the Agenda: The Conflicting Logics of Governing Mobility on Bishkek's Marshrutkas.” Antipode 50, no. 5: 1376–1395.
  18. Sgibnev, Wladimir. 2019. “Living Switches.” In Repair, Brokenness, Breakthrough: Ethnographic Responses, edited by Francisco Martínez and Patrick Laviolette, 293–296. New York: Berghahn. (Politics of Repair 1).
  19. Stanradar. 2019. “After the April Fools’ Joke, Marshrutkas in Dushanbe Stopped Taking Standing Passengers.” https://stanradar.com/news/full/33854-posle-pervoaprelskoj-shutki-marshrutki-v-dushanbe-perestali-brat-stojachih-passazhirov.html. Accessed on April 20, 2026.
  20. Transphoto. 2021. Transphoto.org. https://www.transphoto.org/. Various subpages. Accessed on April 20, 2026.
  21. Varlamov, Ilya. 2020. “Kak chastniki na marshrutkah zahvatili nashi goroda.” https://varlamov.ru/3803589.html. Accessed on April 20, 2026.
  22. Vozyanov, Andrey. 2014. “L’gotniki v gorode. Passažiry staršego vozrasta i ètika mobil’nosti v infrastrukture ukrainskogo obščestvennogo transporta.” Sociologiâ vlasti, no. 3: 60–80.