2025: Special Issue
Articles

Connettività come ragione di Sistema. Il caso dell’Asia centrale

Filippo Costa Buranelli
Università di St Andrews, Regno Unito

Published 2025-07-04

Keywords

  • Central Asia,
  • connectivity,
  • systemic interest,
  • regionalism,
  • pluralism

How to Cite

Costa Buranelli, F. (2025). Connettività come ragione di Sistema. Il caso dell’Asia centrale. ASIAC – Studies on Central Asia and the Caucasus (SCC), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.36253/asiac-3577

Abstract

In recent years, the term connectivity has become increasingly associated with Central Asia, particularly in relation to infrastructure, logistics, trade, and economic development projects. As a landlocked region reliant on external partners to access global markets, Central Asia has witnessed growing investment aimed at facilitating the transit of goods, people, and capital. Yet, the normative and political dimensions of connectivity remain underexplored in the existing literature. This article seeks to address this gap by examining the concept of connectivity in Central Asia through the lens of raison de systéme, or ‘systemic interest’ —a notion that transcends narrow national interests to emphasize the systemic rationale of political choices, one that fosters interdependence and underpins regional political ordering. By adopting this analytical focus, the paper demonstrates to both academic and policy communities that connectivity in Central Asia is not solely driven by economic and geopolitical calculations, but also reflects a transformed regional context in which connectivity emerges as a normative cornerstone of regional stability and order.

References

  1. Adambussinova, Zarina, Aliia Maralbaeva, Chiara Pierobon, and Aijan Sharshenova. 2022. “Academic Life in Central Asia during Covid-19: Challenges and Opportunities for Collaborations.” ENC Analysis, September 22, 2009.
  2. Adilet. 2023a. “Sulla firma di un Accordo sul rafforzamento dell’interconnessione del trasporto a terra nell’Asia centrale.” Ministero della Giustizia della Repubblica del Kazakistan, Istituto di Legislazione e Informazione Legale, 8 settembre, 2023. https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P2300000774.
  3. Adilet. 2023b. “Sulla firma di un Accordo tra la Repubblica del Kazakistan, la Repubblica di Kirghizistan, la Repubblica del Tagikistan, il Turkmenistan e la Repubblica dell’Uzbekistan sulle direzioni generali della politica giovanile.” Ministero della Giustizia della Repubblica del Kazakistan, Istituto di Legislazione e Informazione Legale, 13 settembre, 2023. https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/U2300000351.
  4. Asia-Plus. 2024. “Tajikistan and Uzbekistan Abolish Permits for Mutual Cargo Transport.” Asia-Plus, November 26, 2024. https://asiaplustj.info/en/news/tajikistan/economic/20241126/tajikistan-and-uzbekistan-abolish-permits-for-mutual-cargo-transport.
  5. Bohr, Annette. 2003. “Regional Cooperation in Central Asia: Mission Impossible.” Helsinki Monitor 14, no. 3: 254-268
  6. Borghi, Vando. 2021. “Capitalismo delle infrastrutture e connettività. Proposte per una sociologia critica del ‘mondo a domicilio’.” Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia 62, no. 3: 671-699. https://doi.org/10.1423/101989.
  7. Bueger, Christian, Tobias Liebetrau, and Jan Stockbruegger. 2023. “Theorizing Infrastructures in Global Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 67, no. 4. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqad101.
  8. Buzan, Barry. 2014. An Introduction to the English School of International Relations: The Societal Approach. Cambridge: Polity.
  9. Costa Buranelli, Filippo. 2018a. “One Belt, One Road and Central Asia: Challenges and Opportunities.” In Yu Cheng, Lilei Song, and Lihe Huang (editors) The Belt & Road Initiative in the Global Arena: Chinese and European Perspectives, 207-30. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5921-6_12.
  10. Costa Buranelli, Filippo. 2018b. “World Society as a Shared Ethnos and the Limits of World Society in Central Asia.” International Politics 55, no. 1: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0064-6.
  11. Costa Buranelli, Filippo. 2021. “Central Asian Regionalism or Central Asian Order? Some Reflections.” Central Asian Affairs 8, no. 1: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.30965/22142290-bja10015.
  12. Costa Buranelli, Filippo. 2023. “Central Asian Regionalism After the 5th Leaders’ Meeting.” The Diplomat, September 19, 2023. https://thediplomat.com/2023/09/central-asian-regionalism-after-the-5th-leaders-meeting/.
  13. Costa Buranelli, Filippo. 2024a. “Continuity and Change in the New Cycle of Central Asian Consultative Meetings.” The Diplomat, August 13, 2024. https://thediplomat.com/2024/08/continuity-and-change-in-the-new-cycle-of-central-asian-consultative-meetings/.
  14. Costa Buranelli, Filippo. 2024b. “Of Nomads and Khanates: Heteronomy and Interpolity Order in 19th-Century Central Asia.” European Journal of International Relations 30, no. 2: 461-485. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661231200370.
  15. Dadabaev, Timur. 2021. “Nationhood through Neighborhood? From State Sovereignty to Regional Belonging in Central Asia.” Journal of Borderlands Studies 38, no. 5: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2021.2006750.
  16. Fazendeiro, Bernardo Teles. 2017. “Uzbekistan’s Defensive Self-Reliance: Karimov’s Foreign Policy Legacy.” International Affairs 93, no. 2: 409-427. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiw062.
  17. Gazeta.uz. 2024. “Centro di cooperazione industriale in fase di creazione al confine tra Uzbekistan e Kazakistan.” Газета.uz, 8 agosto, 2024 2024. https://www.gazeta.uz/ru/2024/08/08/industrial-centre/.
  18. Kubicek, Paul. 1997. “Regionalism, Nationalism and Realpolitik in Central Asia.” Europe-Asia Studies 49, no. 4: 637-655. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668139708412464.
  19. March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 2008. “The Logic of Appropriateness.” in Robert Goodin, Michael Moran, and Martin Rein (editors) The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548453.003.0034.
  20. MFA Tajikistan. 2023. “Informazioni sul Forum interparlamentare dell’Asia centrale.” Consolato generale della Repubblica del Tagikistan ad Almaty, 14 febbraio, 2023. https://mfa.tj/ru/almaty/view/12066/o-mezhparlamentskom-forume-gosudarstv-tsentralnoi-azii.
  21. Mun, Olga, and Hikoyat Salimova. 2021. “Towards an Epistemically Pluriversalistic Doctoral Education”. The Post-Pandemic University, March 3, 2021. https://postpandemicuniversity.net/2021/03/03/towards-an-epistemically-pluriversalistic-doctoral-education/.
  22. Onu. 2024. “L’Assemblea Generale ha riconosciuto i paesi dell’Asia centrale ‘zona di pace, fiducia e cooperazione’.” ONU News, 24 ottobre, 2024. https://news.un.org/ru/story/2024/10/1457711.
  23. SugdNEWS. 2024. “В Согде состоялась трехсторонняя встреча глав приграничных областей Таджикистана, Узбекистана и Кыргызстана”. SugdNEWS, December 20, 2024. https://sugdnews.com/2024/12/20/v-sogde-sostojalas-trehstoronnjaja-vstrecha-glav-prigranichnyh-oblastej-tadzhikistana-uzbekistana-i-kyrgyzstana/.
  24. Terradas, Nicolás. 2023. “More than a Catchphrase: Rethinking Adam Watson’s Raison de Système in International Society”. International Politics 62: 170-196. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-023-00479-z.
  25. Tolipov, Farkhod. 2017. “A New Makeup of Central Asia? The First Results of the Regional Policy of Sh. Mirziyoyev.” Central Asia Program, March 26, 2017. https://centralasiaprogram.org/publications-all/voices-from-the-region/a-new-makeup-of-central-asia-the-first-results-of-the-regional-policy-of-sh-mirziyoyev/.
  26. Turkistan Declaration. 2021. “Declaration on the Establishment of the Central Asian Higher Education Area.” The Central Asian Conference of Ministers of Education, June 18, 2021. https://rm.coe.int/-/1680a2eac8.
  27. Unesco. 2021. Policy Brief: Higher Education in Central Asia. Unesco Digital Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377911.
  28. Watson, Adam. 2009. The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis Reissue with a New Introduction by Barry Buzan and Richard Little. London: Routledge.