Vol. 2 (2025)
Articles

The Evolving Integration of Environmental, Traditional, and Moral Themes in Three Works by Chingiz Aitmatov

Paul Woods
Asia Graduate School of Theology - Alliance, Malaysia

Published 2025-11-10

Keywords

  • Ecocriticism,
  • Social Imaginary,
  • Central Asia,
  • Tradition,
  • Post-colonialism,
  • Environment,
  • Aitmatov
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Woods, P. (2025). The Evolving Integration of Environmental, Traditional, and Moral Themes in Three Works by Chingiz Aitmatov. ASIAC – Studies on Central Asia and the Caucasus (SCC), 2, 91–109. https://doi.org/10.36253/asiac-3477

Abstract

This article looks at ecological themes in three novels by the Soviet Kyrgyz writer Chingiz Aitmatov. The three works are The White Steamship (1970), The Day Lasts More than a Hundred Years (1980), and The Executioner’s Block or Plakha (1987). Within and between the three works there is a complex and changing interplay between environmental, moral, and cultural concerns relating primarily to Central Asian society but also indirectly to the Soviet Union. Aitmatov’s ability to critique the Soviet system and its literary theory evolved over time, from the stagnation of Brezhnev’s stabilisation to the optimism of Gorbachev’s perestroika. Within the political constraints of the day and as a minority author within a Russian-dominated literary edifice, Aitmatov argued for greater concern for the environment as well as the need to respect the worldviews of indigenous peoples. The social imaginaries he constructed initially emphasised the role of Central Asian cultures as guardians of sacred lands and ecosystems, but these later gave way to a moral and cultural ecological imperative applicable to all people in the Soviet Union. In The White Steamship, Aitmatov draws on traditional Kyrgyz myths to stress the importance of the forest and the animals within it, reminding his readers of the danger of losing their roots in the face of Soviet communism. His focus in The Day Lasts More than a Hundred Years is the seizing of traditional sacred Kazakh lands and marginalisation of Kazakh cultural values by the Soviets. Finally, in Plakha, sensitive and intelligent wolves are juxtaposed with destructive human beings, who hunt vast numbers of animals to fulfil Soviet production quotas. The inclusion of a Russian hero confirms the broadened scope of Aitmatov’s notion of ecologically and morally responsible traditions. For Aitmatov, respect for the environment, the rights of minorities, and pride in non-Russian cultures and traditions formed an integrated whole which critiqued communist materialism and its modernist emphasis on human agency and power. From The White Steamship to Plakha Aitmatov’s interest shifts from a narrow ethnic scope to a broader interrogation of Soviet civilisation. While Aitmatov’s works were focused on the Soviet state’s attitude to the natural world and its non-Russian peoples, his combination of ethnic moralities and ecological concern remains relevant for today.

References

  1. Aitmatov, C. 1972. The White Steamship. Trans. T. and G. Feifer. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
  2. Aitmatov, C. 1983. The Day Lasts More than a Hundred Years. Trans. J. French. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  3. Aitmatov, C. 1989. The Place of the Skull. Trans. N. Ward. London: Faber and Faber.
  4. Akmataliev, A. 2009. “Вселенная, Человек и Жаабарс [The Universe, Humankind, and the Snow Leopard].” Вопросы Литературы и Искусства 1(6): 6–23.
  5. Ashenova, S. B., and C. N. Velitchenko. 2021. “Проблематика Экологического Дискурса в Произведениях Чингиза Айтматова [The Problematic of Ecological Discourse in the Works of Chingiz Aitmatov].” Серия Журналистики 60(2): 79–85.
  6. Bakashova, J., and O. Sukhomlinova. 2019. Вселенная Айтматова: Библиографическая Энциклопедия [Aitmatov’s Universe: Bibliographic Encyclopaedia]. Bishkek: National Library of Kyrgyzstan.
  7. Banerjee, A. 2018. “Atoms, Aliens, and Compound Crises: Central Asia’s Nuclear Fantastic.” Science Fiction Studies 45(3): 454–468.
  8. Brown, D. 1993. The Last Years of Soviet Russian Literature: Prose-fiction 1975–1991. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Caffee, N. 2013. Russophonia: Towards a Transnational Conception of Russian-Language Literature. PhD diss., University of California, Los Angeles.
  10. Chapple, R. 1992. “Chingiz Aitmatov’s ‘The Place of the Skull’: A Soviet Writer’s Excursion into Theology.” New Zealand Slavonic Journal: 105–115.
  11. Djagalov, R. 2009. “Pamiat΄ vs. Memorial: Rasputin, Aitmatov and the Search for Soviet Memory.” Studies in Slavic Culture 8: 27–42.
  12. Glotfelty, C. 1996. “Introduction.” In The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology, ed. C. Glotfelty and H. Fromm, xv–xxxvii. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
  13. Goncharov, P. A. 2024. “Ч. Айтматов и Русская Традиционалистская Проза 1960–1970-х гг [Ch. Aitmatov and Traditional Russian Prose in the 1960s–1970s].” Neofilologiya 10(1): 117–127.
  14. Guillot, M., N. Gavrilova, and T. Pudrovska. 2011. “Understanding the ‘Russian Mortality Paradox’ in Central Asia: Evidence from Kyrgyzstan.” Demography 48(3): 1081–1104.
  15. Haber, E. 1993. The Myth of the Non-Russian: Iskander and Aitmatov’s Magical Universe. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  16. Huggan, G., and H. Tiffin. 2010. Postcolonial Ecocriticism: Literature, Animals, Environment. London: Routledge.
  17. Igmen, A. 2012. Speaking Soviet with an Accent: Culture and Power in Kyrgyzstan. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  18. James, P. 2019. “The Social Imaginary in Theory and Practice.” In Revisiting the Global Imaginary, ed. C. Hudson and E. K. Wilson, 33–47. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  19. Kolesnikoff, N. 1998. “Biblical Motifs in Chingiz Aitmatov’s The Place of the Skull.” Canadian Slavonic Papers 40(1–2): 17–26.
  20. Kolodny, A. 1975. The Lay of the Land: Metaphor as Experience and History in American Life and Letters. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
  21. LeMenager, S., T. Shewry, and K. Hiltner. 2011. Environmental Criticism for the Twenty-First Century. New York: Routledge.
  22. Likhachev, D. 1979. “Ekologiia kul′tury.” Moskva 7: 173–179.
  23. Loomba, A. 1998. Colonialism/Post-colonialism. London: Routledge.
  24. Maltseva, E. 2022. “Railroad Theme in Soviet Poster.” Transportation Research Procedia 61: 240–247.
  25. Maryniak, I. 1991. Religious Perspectives in Soviet Prose Fiction 1964–1988: The Animist/Totemist Dichotomy. PhD diss., University of London.
  26. Moore, D. C. 2001. “Is the Post- in Postcolonial the Post- in Post-Soviet? Toward a Global Postcolonial Critique.” PMLA 116(1): 111–128.
  27. Muratov, A. 2018. “Aytmatov’s Ethno Pedagogy: Collision of Civilizations.” Alatoo Academic Studies 3: 24–32.
  28. Nemutlu, Ö. 2018. “Environmental Awareness in Cengiz Aitmatov’s Short Stories and Novels.” Celal Bayar University Journal of Social Sciences (Special Issue): 237–254.
  29. Olcott, A. 1989. Non-Russian Writers of Russian Literature: Final Report. Washington, DC: National Council for Soviet and East European Research.
  30. Ozdek, A. 2008. The Heteroglossic Narratives of National History: Mythified Histories and the Postcolonial Condition. PhD diss., George Washington University.
  31. Perkiömäki, M. 2020. “Rivers of Noosphere Stories: Russian Natural-Philosophical Prose as Cultural Ecology.” The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review 47: 257–284.
  32. Roksandic, I. 2002. The Ouroboros Seizes its Tale. PhD diss., University of British Columbia.
  33. Rueckert, W. 1978. “Literature and Ecology: An Experiment in Ecocriticism.” Iowa Review 9(1): 71–86.
  34. Sharshenalieva, A., and K. Kalieva. 2023. “Ecocritical Approach to Plakha by Ch. Aitmatov.” Bulletin of Science and Practice 9(6): 689–696.
  35. Sharyafetdinov, R., R. Khairullin, and I. Tairova. 2023. “Художественное Своеобразие Романов Ч.Т. Айтматова…” Новый Филологический Вестник 1(64): 145–159.
  36. Shevchugova, E. 2019. “Христианские Мотивы в Романе Ч. Т. Айтматова «Плаха».” Филология 18(9): 194–201.
  37. Shneidman, N. 1979. Soviet Literature in the 1970s: Artistic Diversity and Ideological Conformity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  38. Shneidman, N. 1989. Soviet Literature in the 1980s: Decade of Transition. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  39. Sigman, J. 1998. Myth, Metaphor and Meaning: Three Works by Chingiz Aitmatov. PhD diss., Brown University.
  40. Smirnova, A. 2024. “Художественная Вселенная Чингиза Айтматова…” Полилингвиальность и Транскультурные Практики 21(1): 122–133.
  41. Steger, M. 2009. “Political Ideologies and Social Imaginaries in the Global Age.” Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 2: 1–17.
  42. Sydykbekov, R., and M. Ibraev. 2021. “Экологические Ценности в Творчестве Ч. Айтматова.” Вестник Кыргызско-Российского Славянского Университета 21(6): 98–102.
  43. Taylor, C. 2004. Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  44. Taylor, C. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  45. Tuan, Y.-F. 1977. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  46. Ukubayeva, L. 2016. “Social Problems and Destiny of Man in Chingiz Aitmatov’s Work of Art.” Karadeniz Uluslararası Bilimsel Dergi 26: 32–37.
  47. Yusupova, M. 2023. “Coloniality of Gender and Knowledge: Rethinking Russian Masculinities.” Sociology 57(3): 682–699.