Re-Fashioning Leather: A Study to Bring to the Fore a New Awareness of How a Specific Material (Leather) Does not have to be Finite as Nature
Published 14-07-2025
Keywords
- Leather; Nurture; Restore; Sustainable; Philosophy.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2025 Kayla Owen

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This research, interrogates and offers insight into the potentiality of leather, emphasizing that it is time to re-align thinking, provoke introspection and challenge existing norms. The aim is to demonstrate the value in forming a prosperity fashion philosophy centered on a specific by-product (leather), which offers a more ethical and sustainable viewpoint. Examining and promoting creative circular initiatives integral to a specific sub-group and creating an open collaborative and cumulative knowledge transfer, it is hoped that these shared ideas and practices gain strength, to create a blueprint for a prosperity fashion philosophy. To provide an actualized possibility for re-alignments and new approaches for leather production, consumption, and value as a starting point for cultural discussion. Challenging the fast fashion industry by presenting a slow, flexible future where leather fashion become investments because of their flexibility, and durability. Urging us to collectively forge new systems that disrupt and replace the current destructive cycle. Decreasing the negative impact of fashion on the environment, and people, through a focus on the ultimate circular material.
References
- Allyne, L. (2016). Something About Leather. New South Wales: Wentworth Press.
- Barber, A. (2022). Consumed: The Need for Collective Change; Colonialism, Climate & Consumerism. London: Brazen.
- Chapman, J. (2015). Emotionally Durable Design: Objects, experiences and empathy. London/New York: Routledge.
- Cooper, E. (2008). The Craftsman by Richard Sennett. The Journal of Modern Craft, 1(3), 435-437.
- Dudley, S. (2010). Museums and Traditional Art Forms: Promoting Appreciation and Understanding. Museum Studies Review, 12(4), 145-158.
- Duncan, H. (2013). Revitalization Efforts for Traditional Art Forms: Supporting Economic Sustainability. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management, 16(2), 89-102.
- Fine, G. (2003). Towards a Peopled Ethnography Developing Theory from Group Life. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods 4(1), 41.
- Fletcher, K. (2014). Sustainable Fashion and Textiles: Design Journeys. London/New York: Routledge.
- Fletcher, K., & Grose, L. (2012). Fashion & Sustainability: Design for Change. London: Laurence King Publishing.
- Harris, S., & Veldmeijer, A. J. (2014). Why Leather? The Material and Cultural Dimensions of Leather. Netherlands: Sidestone Press.
- Hoette, R., & Stevenson, C. (2000). Modus: A platform for Fashion Practice. Creative Commons Publishing [online].
- Kramer, M., & Adams, T. (2017). Ethnography. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods 4(2), 458-461.
- Quilleriet, A. (2004). The Leather Book. New York: Assouline.
- Sampson, E. (2020). Worn: Footwear, Attachment and the Affects of Wear. London: Bloomsbury.
- Rocamora, A., & Smelik, A. (2019) Thinking Through Fashion: A Guide to Key Theorists (Dress Cultures). London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
- Thomas, D. (2019). Fashionopolis: The Price of Fast fashion and the Future of Clothes. London: Penguin.
- Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Transitional Objects and Transitional Phenomena’, in Playing and Reality, London: Routledge.
- Trainer, T. (2017). Marxist Theory: An Outline. The simpler way [blog] 15 February Available at https://www.thesimplerway.info/Marx.htm.
- UNIC Italian Tanneries. (2019) Sustainability Report. Italy: UNIC. [Acquired @ Lineapelle Leather Fair, New York, U.S.A. January 29th 2020].