No. SI1 (2025): Special Issue
Essays

Rewear, Redefine, Co-design: Towards an Ontology of Pre-Loved and Personalized Fashion

Michela Musto
Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”

Published 14-07-2025

Keywords

  • slow fashion,
  • pre-owned fashion,
  • custom made fashion,
  • Circular Fashion,
  • Design process; extended lifetimes; fashion services; well-being,
  • Fashion Industry Transformation,
  • Fashion Paradigms,
  • Fashion Research,
  • Sustainable fashion,
  • Fashion Visual Culture
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Musto, M. (2025). Rewear, Redefine, Co-design: Towards an Ontology of Pre-Loved and Personalized Fashion. Fashion Highlight, (SI1), 598–608. https://doi.org/10.36253/fh-3160

Abstract

The concept of uniqueness is becoming increasingly central in consumer purchasing decisions, the desire for exclusivity and authenticity is manifested through the growing adoption of garments that enable individuals to express their identity, enhancing the personal value of the clothes they wear. This study explores the affective dimensions of fashion, focusing on the rise of hyper-personalized and pre-loved garments as key drivers of a paradigm of slower, sustainable consumption. Far from being simple trends, these practices enact significant transformation in how individuals and objects relate. Drawing on philosophical frameworks, the paper positions garments as transitional objects that embody personal and collective narratives, fostering emotional durability and a deeper connection with materiality. While hyper-personalization, empowered by digital interactivity, invites consumers to collaborate in the creative process, transforming garments into existential companions, the re-ontholisation of pre-loved garments challenges fast fashion’s disposability, framing second-hand clothing as a means of ethical resistance and ontological continuity. These dynamics, intertwined with principles of slow fashion and circular economy, point to a broader socio-cultural shift toward inclusive prosperity, balancing individual well-being, environmental integrity, and social justice, reframing fashion as a critical practice renewing its role as a medium for reimagining a more sustainable and existentially resonant sartorial culture.

References

  1. Antonelli, P. (2019). Broken Nature: Design takes on human survival. Electa.
  2. Ash, J. (2012). Relocating feeling within material culture: Clothing and emotion. Journal of Material Culture, 17(4), 375–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183512461738
  3. Attfield, J. (2000). Wild things: The material culture of everyday life. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  4. Bain & Company. (2022). The future of luxury personalization. Bain Insights. https://www.bain.com
  5. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press.
  6. Black, S. (2012). The sustainable fashion handbook. Thames & Hudson.
  7. Bodei, R. (2009). La vita delle cose. Editori Laterza.
  8. Cervellon, M.-C., Carey, L., & Harms, T. (2012). Something old, something used: Determinants of women's purchase of vintage fashion vs second-hand fashion. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 40(12), 956–974. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590551211274946
  9. Chapman, J. (2005). Emotionally durable design: Objects, experiences and empathy. Routledge.
  10. Crane, D. (2012). Fashion and its social agendas: Class, gender, and identity in clothing. University of Chicago Press.
  11. De Castro, O. (2021). Loved Clothes last. Penguin life.
  12. Deloitte. (2015). Made-to-order: The rise of mass personalization. Deloitte Insights. https://www2.deloitte.com
  13. Filippello, R., & Bucci, A. (2019). Affective Fashion(s). In Association for Art History Annual Conference Proceedings. Edinburgh College of Art, The University of Edinburgh.
  14. Fletcher, K. (2008). Sustainable fashion and textiles: Design journeys. Earthscan.
  15. Fletcher, K., & Grose, L. (2012). Fashion & Sustainability: Design for Change. Laurence King Publishing.
  16. Franke, N., & Schreier, M. (2008). Product uniqueness as a driver of customer utility in mass customization. Marketing Letters, 19(2), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-007-9029-7
  17. GlobalData, & ThredUp. (2023). The global second-hand clothing market projected to reach $350 billion by 2028. FashionUnited. Retrieved from https://fashionunited.it/news/business/l-abbigliamento-di-seconda-mano-sta-superando-la-vendita-al-dettaglio/2024032825310
  18. Harris, O., & Sørensen, T. F. (2010). Rethinking emotion and material culture. Archaeological Dialogues, 17(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203810000143
  19. Kawamura, Y. (2005). Fashion-ology: An introduction to fashion studies. Berg.
  20. Klein, N. (2019). Let's make sustainability a fashion statement. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP, April 24). Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/blog/lets-make-sustainability-fashion-statement
  21. Langh, H. (2022). Bleeding garments: A magical and poetic approach to the phenomenology of intensely evocative garments [PhD thesis]. University for the Creative Arts.
  22. Latouche, S. (2012). Farewell to growth. Polity Press.
  23. Levi Strauss & Co. (2021). Sustainability progress report. Levi Strauss & Co. https://www.levistrauss.com
  24. Lipovetsky, G. (1994). The empire of fashion: Dressing modern democracy. Princeton University Press.
  25. McKinsey & Company. (2021). Sustainability in fashion: Toward a circular economy. McKinsey Insights. https://www.mckinsey.com
  26. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge.
  27. Miller, D. (2006). Materiality and emotion. In D. Miller (Ed.), Materiality (pp. 343–354). Duke University Press.
  28. Miller, D. (2008). The comfort of things. Polity Press.
  29. Mugge, R., Schoormans, J. P. L., & Schifferstein, H. N. J. (2009). Emotional bonding with personalised products. Journal of Engineering Design, 20(5), 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820802698550
  30. Norton, M. I., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2012). The IKEA effect: When labor leads to love. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.08.002
  31. Ravnløkke, L., Permiin, L., & Wehlitz, A. S. (2023). Bodily ways of knowing in fashion: Connectedness between clothing and the body. Journal of Embodied Research, 6(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.16995/jer9613
  32. Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory, history, forgetting. University of Chicago Press.
  33. Roux, D., & Guiot, D. (2008). Measuring second-hand shopping motives, antecedents, and consequences. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition, 23(4), 63–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/205157070802300404
  34. Schilder, P. (1935). The image and appearance of the human body. International Universities Press.
  35. Schmitt, B. (1999). Experiential marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 15(1–3), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725799784870496
  36. Talkbacks. (n.d.). Circular economy benefits: Sustainable approach to resource use. Retrieved November 25, 2024, from https://talkbacks.com/sustainability/circular-economy-benefits/
  37. van Doorn, N. (2016). Kinship and material culture in queer communities. Journal of Cultural Research, 20(1), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2016.1101356
  38. Virid. (n.d.). eCommerce personalization best practices. Retrieved November 25, 2024, from https://www.virid.com/blog/general/ecommerce-personalization-best-practices
  39. von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. MIT Press.
  40. Weiner, A. B., & Schneider, J. (1989). Cloth and human experience. Smithsonian Institution Press.
  41. Winnicott, D. W. (1953). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 34, 89–97.