No. 4 (2024)
Editorial

Fashion’s Fibres as Planetary Flows

Alice Payne
RMIT
Anneke Smelik
Radboud University Nijmegen

Published 31-12-2024

Keywords

  • fibre,
  • fashion materiality,
  • new materialism,
  • posthumanism,
  • planetary flows

How to Cite

Payne, A., & Smelik , A. (2024). Fashion’s Fibres as Planetary Flows. Fashion Highlight, (4), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.36253/fh-3327

Abstract

Fibre, the basis of fashion’s materiality, is experiencing a rising demand year on year, reflecting the insatiable desire for ‘more’ that defines the dominant fashion system. With an annual consumption of 124 million tonnes in 2023, a doubling in twenty years (Textile Exchange 2024), humanity’s appetite for fibre has never been more voracious. Recent studies on fashion’s fibre are diverse: including technical analyses of different fibres’ sustainability benefits or challenges (e.g., Subramanian et al 2021), analysis of their value chains (e.g., Mellick et al 2021) and cultural histories (Stanes and Gibson 2017; Smelik 2023). In industry contexts there are calls for fibre to be traceable from all sources – whether from forests, oil fields, farms, or laboratories – and their impacts to be quantified and reduced (e.g., UNECE 2021; Changing Markets 2022).

The fourth issue of Fashion Highlight Journal proposes a planetary perspective on fibre, viewing it as a dynamic interplay of material flows and forces shaped by both human and non-human actors, the living and the technological, and the crowded continuum between them. In this Introduction we will first briefly situate our study of fibres within theoretical perspectives of new materialism and posthumanism. Then we will introduce the thirteen peer-reviewed papers through three thematic threads that we have detected among and across them.

References

  1. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28(3), 801–831.
  2. Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Polity Press.
  3. Braidotti, R. (2016). Posthuman Critical Theory. In Banerji, D., Paranjape, M. (eds) Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3637-5_2
  4. Braidotti, R., and M. Hlavajova, eds. 2018. The Posthuman Glossary. Bloomsbury.
  5. Brown, B. (2001). Thing Theory. Critical Inquiry 28 (1), 1–22.
  6. Brown, B. (2015) Other Things. The University of Chicago Press.
  7. Changing Markets Foundation. (2022). Synthetics Anonymous 2.0: Fashion’s persistent plastic problem. https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Synthetics-Anonymous-2-online-reports-layout.pdf
  8. Colman, F. and I. van der Tuin (2024). Methods and Genealogies of New Materialisms. Edinburgh University Press.
  9. Ingold, T. (2012). Toward an ecology of materials. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 427–4 42. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145920
  10. Ingold, T. (2015). The Life of Lines. Routledge, 2015.
  11. Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Routledge.
  12. Margulis, L. and Sagan, D. (1997). Slanted Truths: Essays on Gaia, Symbiosis and Evolution. Springer.
  13. Mellick, Z., Payne, A., & Buys, L. (2021). From Fibre to Fashion: Understanding the Value of Sustainability in Global Cotton Textile and Apparel Value Chains. Sustainability, 13(22), 12681. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12681.
  14. Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. University of Minnesota Press.
  15. Payne, A. (2019). Fashion Futuring in the Anthropocene: Sustainable Fashion as “Taming” and “Rewilding”. Fashion Theory, 23(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704X.2017.1374097
  16. Rockström, J. et al. (2009). Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society 14(2): 32. [online]: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/
  17. Smelik, A. (2018). New Materialism: A Theoretical Framework for Fashion in the Age of Technological Innovation. International Journal of Fashion Studies 5(1), 31-52. https://doi.org/10.1386/infs.5.1.33_1
  18. Smelik, A. (2023). Polyester: A Cultural History. Fashion Practice, 15(2), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2023.2196158
  19. Stanes, E., & Gibson, C. (2017). Materials that linger: An embodied geography of polyester clothes. Geoforum, 85, 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.07.006
  20. Subramanian, K., Sarkar, M. K., Wang, H., Qin, Z.-H., Chopra, S. S., Jin, M., Kumar, V., Chen, C., Tsang, C.-W., & Lin, C. S. K. (2022). An overview of cotton and polyester, and their blended waste textile valorisation to value-added products: A circular economy approach – research trends, opportunities and challenges. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 52(21), 3921-3942. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2021.1966254
  21. Exchange, T. (2024). Materials Market Report 2024. https://textileexchange.org/app/uploads/2024/09/Materials-Market-Report-2024.pdf
  22. Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton University Press.
  23. UNECE. (2021). Policy brief – Harnessing the potential of blockchain technology for due diligence and sustainability in cotton value chains. https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2021-04/ECE_TRADE_C_CEFACT_2021_12E-TextilePolicyBrief_0.pdf
  24. UNCCD (2024). Fashion & Land: Unravelling the Environmental Impact of Fibres. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), Bonn. https://www.unccd.int/sites/default/files/2024-12/UNCCD-Fashion%26LAND-FINAL%20online%20publication_final_single%20pages.pdf