La soddisfazione dei bisogni fondamentali delle generazioni future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36253/rifp-3687Parole chiave:
sufficientarismo intergenerazionale, giustizia intergenerazionale, prospettiva sufficientarista, bisogni fondamentaliAbstract
Questo articolo esplora il ruolo dei bisogni fondamentali nelle teorie della giustizia intergenerazionale, concentrandosi su forme di sufficientarismo intergenerazionale che considerano la soddisfazione dei bisogni fondamentali come il principale obbligo morale nei confronti delle generazioni future. L’articolo sostiene una concezione moderatamente esigente dei bisogni fondamentali e argomenta che ciascun bisogno dovrebbe essere associato a una gamma di possibili “soddisfattori”, consentendo alle generazioni future di scegliere come soddisfare i propri bisogni fondamentali. L’inclusione di una pluralità di soddisfattori amplia le responsabilità delle generazioni presenti e trasforma le prospettive sufficientariste tradizionali in un quadro più esigente, di tipo quasi-sufficientarista, della giustizia intergenerazionale.
Downloads
Riferimenti bibliografici
Axelsen, David, and Lasse Nielsen. “Essentially Enough: Elements of a Plausible Account of Sufficientarianism.” In What Is Enough?: Sufficiency, Justice, and Health, edited by Carina Fourie and Annett Rid, 101–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199385263.003.0006.
Boss, George. “Basic Human Needs: Abstraction, Indeterminacy, and the Political Account of Need.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 26, no. 7 (2023): 1140–1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2022.2044104.
Boss, George. “Needs, Politics, and the Climate Crisis.” Ethics, Policy & Environment (2024): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2024.2325079.
Boss, George. “Political Theory and the Politics of Need.” European Journal of Political Theory 24, no. 3 (2025): 357–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851231200673.
Braybrooke, David. Meeting Needs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987.
Brock, Gillian. “Are There Any Defensible Indigenous Rights?” Contemporary Political Theory 1, no. 3 (2002): 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300034.
Brock, Gillian. Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Caney, Simon. “Two Kinds of Climate Justice: Avoiding Harm and Sharing Burdens.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 22, no. 2 (2014): 125–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12030.
Casal, Paula. “Sufficiency, Nature, and the Future.” Political Philosophy 1, no. 1 (2024): 72–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/plp.2023.27.
Cass, Devon, and André Santos Campos. “Introduction: Relational Equality and Intergenerational Justice.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 28, no. 3 (2025): 375–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2024.2312456.
Catala, Amandine. “Democracy, Trust, and Epistemic Justice.” The Monist 98, no. 4 (2015): 424–440. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onv026.
Copp, David. “The Right to an Adequate Standard of Living: Justice, Autonomy, and the Basic Needs.” Social Philosophy & Policy 9, no. 1 (1992): 231–261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500003634.
De Brasi, Leandro, and Jack Warman. “Deliberative Democracy, Epistemic Injustice, and Epistemic Disenfranchisement.” Logos & Episteme 14, no. 1 (2023): 7–27. https://doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme20231411.
Doyal, Len, and Ian Gough. A Theory of Human Need. London: Macmillan, 1991.
Finneron-Burns, Elizabeth. “Contractualism and the Non-Identity Problem.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19, no. 5 (2016): 1151–1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-016-9739-9.
Finneron-Burns, Elizabeth. What We Owe to Future People: A Contractualist Account of Intergenerational Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024.
Frankfurt, Harry G. “Necessity and Desire.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45, no. 1 (1984): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2307/2107321.
Fricker, Miranda. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Goodin, Robert E. “The Priority of Needs.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45, no. 4 (1985): 615–625. https://doi.org/10.2307/2107584.
Gough, Ian. “Climate Change and Sustainable Welfare: The Centrality of Human Needs.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 39, no. 5 (2015): 1191–1214. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bev039.
Gough, Ian. “Sufficiency as a Value Standard: From Preferences to Needs.” Ethics, Policy & Environment (2023): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2023.2237069.
Gough, Ian. “Universal Basic Services: A Theoretical and Moral Framework.” The Political Quarterly 90, no. 3 (2019): 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12610.
Hamilton, Lawrence. The Political Philosophy of Needs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Heikkinen, Karri. “Why Intergenerational Sufficientarianism Is Not Enough.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 24, no. 2 (2025): 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X241246181.
Kumar, Rahul. “Wronging Future People: A Contractualist Proposal.” In Intergenerational Justice, edited by Axel Gosseries and Lukas H. Meyer, 251–272. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Liveriero, Federica. “Epistemic Injustice in the Political Domain: Powerless Citizens and Institutional Reform.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 23, no. 5 (2020): 797–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-020-10096-4.
Martin, D. Valeska. “Navigating Nonidentity: Scanlonian Contractualism and Types of Persons.” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 29 (2024): 86–106. https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v29i1.2274.
Meyer, Lukas H., and Thomas Pölzler. “Basic Needs and Sufficiency: The Foundations of Intergenerational Justice.” In The Oxford Handbook of Intergenerational Ethics, edited by Stephen M. Gardiner. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190881931.013.23.
Miller, David. “Grounding Human Rights.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15, no. 4 (2012): 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2012.698865.
Nullmeier, Frank. “Towards a Theory of Needs-Based Justice.” In Need-Based Distributive Justice, edited by Stefan Traub and Bernhard Kittel, 191–208. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71014-8_10.
Nussbaum, Martha C. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Page, Edward A. “Intergenerational Justice of What: Welfare, Resources, or Capabilities?” Environmental Politics 16, no. 3 (2007): 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010701251694.
Petz, Daniel. “Exploring Intergenerational Climate Resilience: A Basic Needs-Based Conception.” Ethics, Policy & Environment 27, no. 3 (2024): 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2024.2305035.
Reader, Soran, and Gillian Brock. “Needs, Moral Demands, and Moral Theory.” Utilitas 16, no. 3 (2004): 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095382080400121X.
Rosen, Frederick. “Basic Needs and Justice.” Mind 86, no. 341 (1977): 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LXXXVI.341.88.
Schuppert, Fabian. “Distinguishing Basic Needs and Fundamental Interests.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16, no. 1 (2013): 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2012.757918.
Siebel, Mark, and Thomas Schramme. “Need-Based Justice from the Perspective of Philosophy.” In Need-Based Distributive Justice, edited by Stefan Traub and Bernhard Kittel, 21–58. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71014-8_2.
Soper, Kate. “A Theory of Human Needs.” New Left Review 197 (1993): 113–128.
Soper, Kate. “Conceptualizing Needs in the Context of Consumer Politics.” Journal of Consumer Policy 29, no. 4 (2007): 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-006-9029-7.
Spengler, Laura. “Two Types of ‘Enough’: Sufficiency as Minimum and Maximum.” Environmental Politics 25, no. 5 (2016): 921–940. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1164355.
Thomson, Garrett. Needs. London: Routledge 1987
Wiggins, David. Needs, Values, Truth. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2025 Fabian Schuppert
TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
