No. SI1 (2025): Special Issue
Essays

Embodying Prosperity: How Handspun and Handwoven Pattu Textiles Reflect Sustainable Fashion and Community Resilience in Western Rajasthan

Pdf
  • Pramila Choudhary
Pramila Choudhary
Concordia University, Montreal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/fh-3152

Published 14-07-2025

Keywords

  • Indigenous and Local Ecological Knowledge (ILEK),
  • Unstitched textiles,,
  • Traditional Ecological Knowledge,
  • embodied knowledge,
  • environmental sustainability,
  • community resilience,
  • ethical and local production,
  • indigenous wool
    • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Choudhary, P. (2025). Embodying Prosperity: How Handspun and Handwoven Pattu Textiles Reflect Sustainable Fashion and Community Resilience in Western Rajasthan. Fashion Highlight, (SI1), 360–366. https://doi.org/10.36253/fh-3152

Copyright (c) 2025 Pramila Choudhary

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This paper explores India’s agropastoral desi oon (wool) textile traditions and their significance in embodying prosperity, focusing on hand-spun and handwoven Pattu textiles. Pattu is a multifunctional textile—used as a shawl, skirt, blanket, mat, or rain cover—valued for its durability and warmth in desert climates. The word “Pattu” derives from patti, meaning narrow-width fabric, woven on pit treadle looms (Khaddi) (Rustagi, 2021). Two narrow strips (pattis) are stitched together to form a blanket or shawl (Munshi et al., 1992). Grounded in Indigenous and Local Ecological Knowledge (ILEK), Pattu’s making involves intergenerational hand-spinning, weaving, and embroidery practices. These textiles not only reflect the ecological rhythms of desert life but also sustain a meaningful relationship between communities and their environment. Crafted from locally sourced desi oon, Pattu embodies both ecological sustainability and cultural identity (Jaitly, 1990). By exploring embedded skills, seasonal rhythms, and collaborative production, this paper highlights how Pattu supports rural livelihoods, preserves intangible cultural heritage, and fosters community resilience. In an era of climate crisis and industrialized fashion, Pattu offers a culturally rooted, sustainable alternative that reconnects people, place, and practice.

Pdf

References

  1. Bayly, C. A. (1986). The Origins of Nationality in South Asia: Patriotism and Ethical Government in the Making of Modern India. Oxford University Press.
  2. Berkes, F. (2012). Sacred Ecology (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203123843 (ILEK)
  3. Bhandari, V. (2004). Costumes, Textiles and Jewellery of India-traditions in Rajasthan. Delhi: Prakash.
  4. CfP. (2022). Desi Oon - Hamara Apna: Assessment of the state of value chains for indigenous raw wool in India. Delhi: Published by Centre for Pastoralism.
  5. Centre for Pastoralism (2022). Centre for Pastoralism Annual Report.
  6. Chahana Mehta; Revitalising Kambli: From Insight to Intervention ; International Journal of creative research thoughts (IJCRT); 2023; ISBN 2320-2882
  7. Crawford, M. B. 2009. Shop class as soulcraft: An inquiry into the value of work. New York: Penguin Press.
  8. Dreyfus, H., and S. D. Kelly. 2011. All things shining: Reading the Western classics to find meaning in a secular age. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  9. Das, S. (2021). Pastoral Times. Delhi: Centre for Pastoralism.
  10. Das, S., & Iyengar, S. (2021). Reviving indigenous wool craft of India. In Saad, Q. (Ed) Futuring
  11. Craft, Indian Ocean Triennial Australia IOTA 21 International Conference (pp. 64-90). Retrieved From https://indianoceancrafttriennial.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/IOTA21-conference-proceedings-3_compressed.pdf
  12. Fischer, A., and A. Eastwood. 2016. Coproduction of ecosystem services as human–nature interactions—An analytical framework. Land Use Policy 52:41–50. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.004.
  13. Fletcher, K. (2011). Post-growth fashion. In Fashion and Sustainability: Design for change (pp. 176-184). London: Laurence King Publishing.
  14. Fletcher, K., St. Pierre, L., & Tham, M. (Eds.). (2019). Design and nature : a partnership. Routledge.
  15. Flint, C. G., I. Kunze, A. Muhar, Y. Yoshida, and M. Penker. 2013. Exploring empirical typologies of human–nature relationships and linkages to the ecosystem services concept. Landscape and Urban Planning 120:208–17. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.002.
  16. Gandhi, M. K. (1927). The Story of My Experiments with Truth. Navajivan Publishing House.
  17. Latouche, S. (2012). Farewell to Growth. Polity Press.
  18. Iyengar, S., (2021). Reviving a Heritage in Peril: India’s Endangered Traditions of Cotton and Wool! Journal of Heritage Management Volume 6, Issue 1, 25-39.
  19. Ignatow, G. 2007. Theories of embodied knowledge: New directions for cultural and cognitive sociology?. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37 (2):115–35. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2007.00328.x.
  20. Ingold, T. 2000. The perception of the environment. London: Routledge.
  21. Ingold, T. 2017. On human correspondence. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 23 (1):
  22. –27. doi:10.1111/1467-9655.12541.
  23. Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Routledge.
  24. Janice Helland, Beverly Lemire and Alena Buis, Craft, Community and The Material Culture of Place and Politics, 19th-20th Century, 2014 (Edward Cook)
  25. Jaitly, J. (1990). The Craft Traditions of India. Delhi: Lustre Press pvt. Ltd.
  26. Jain, B. (2007). Registan ka Lok Vigyan. Barmer: Society to Uplift Rural Economy (SURE)
  27. Ladon, P., Nüsser, M. & Garkoti, S.C. Mountain agropastoralism: traditional practices, institutions and pressures in the Indian Trans-Himalaya of Ladakh. Pastoralism 13, 30 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13570-023-00289-1
  28. Leitão, R.M., (2022). From Needs to Desire: Pluriversal Design as a Desire-Based Design. Design and
  29. Culture, 14(3), pp.255–276. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2022.2103949
  30. Living Lightly. (2017). Living Lighty: Journeys with Pastoralists. Retrieved from
  31. https://livinglightly.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/LL-Delhi-Report_compressed.pdf
  32. Louv, R. 2005. Last child in the woods: Saving our kids from nature deficit disorder. New York:
  33. Workman Publishing Company.
  34. Nath, A. et al., (1987). Arts & Crafts of Rajasthan. Ahmedabad: Mapin Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
  35. Parasrampuria, S. (2020). Pattu weaving a Warm Web of Production; a graduation project document,
  36. National Institute of Design.
  37. Polanyi, M. 2005[1958]. Personal knowledge. Towards a post-critical philosophy. London:
  38. Routledge.
  39. Rustagi, S. (2019). Pattu: Decorative Textile of Western Rajasthan. e-Journal Volume 3, Textiles and
  40. Clothing Research Centre Issue 5, 22-24.
  41. Parthasarathi, P. (2011). Why Europe Grew Rich and Asia Did Not: Global Economic Divergence, 1600–1850. Cambridge University Press.
  42. Riello, G., & Roy, T. (2009). How India Clothed the World: The World of South Asian Textiles, 1500–1850. Brill.
  43. Sennett, R. 2008. The craftsman. New Haven: Yale University.
  44. Serge Latouche (2012) Can the Left Escape Economism?, Capitalism Nature
  45. Socialism, 23:1, 74-78, DOI: 10.1080/10455752.2011.648841
  46. Spaargaren, G., D. Weenink, and M. Lamers. 2016. Practice theory and research: Exploring the
  47. dynamics of social life. London: Routledge.
  48. UNESCO Office in New Delhi. (2022). [Handmade for the 21st century: safeguarding traditional Indian textiles] (R. Sethi, Author; J. Han, Ed.). UNESCO. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/
  49. Viveca Mellegård & Wiebren J. Boonstra (2020) Craftsmanship as a Carrier of Indigenous and Local Ecological Knowledge: Photographic Insights from Sámi Duodji and Archipelago Fishing, Society & Natural Resources, 33:10, 1252-1272, DOI:
  50. 1080/08941920.2020.1729911
  51. Zapate, N. (2017). SPINNING FOR SWARAJ: GANDHI’S IDEA OF ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY AND SELF-GOVERNMENT (1920 TO 1927). Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 78, 812–819. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26906155
  52. Zylstra, M. J., A. T. Knight, K. J. Esler, and L. L. Le Grange. 2014. Connectedness as a core conservation
  53. concern: An interdisciplinary review of theory and a call for practice. Springer
  54. Science Reviews 2 (1–2):119–43. doi:10.1007/s40362-014-0021-3.

Most read articles by the same author(s)