No. SI1 (2025): Special Issue
Editorial

Prosperity Fashion

Paolo Franzo
Università degli Studi di Firenze

Published 14-07-2025

Keywords

  • Prosperity Fashion,
  • Fashion System,
  • New Awareness,
  • Complexity,
  • Research in Fashion

How to Cite

Franzo, P. (2025). Prosperity Fashion . Fashion Highlight, (SI1), 22–24. https://doi.org/10.36253/fh-3560

Abstract

The fashion system has been questioning for years how to decrease its negative impact on the environment and people, trying to improve individual elements: from natural, organic or recycled materials to zero-waste design methodologies, from slower production processes to socially responsible actions, from development of local supply chains to inclusive communication campaigns, from blockchain traceability of products to more reliable trend forecasts through artificial intelligence, from social engagement to large scale regulation.

Thanks to the contribution of researchers, practitioners, and activists, a new awareness in civil society about the finite nature of materials and resources has been achieved, and the definition of standards and certifications regulating fashion processes and products towards circular and closed ecosystems has been refined and broadly disseminated.

This awareness, however, often conflicts with the need for constant and exponential economic growth, on which fashion brands base their creative direction, communication, branding, and sales decisions. The last few decades, marked by climate, humanitarian and health crises, have prompted debate about the prevailing economic model centred on ‘GDP Fetishism’ (Stiglitz 2009), which consists of holding Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as definitive and universal, and thus pursuing it at the cost of dramatically burdening environmental, human, and social resources. Many researchers have gone back to the criticisms made by the Club of Rome in 1972 to verify and actualise them, fuelling the need not only for a new direction for economics and production, but also for new definitions and terminologies for this urgent change of pace: a-growth and post-development politics (Latouche 2012), post-growth fashion (Fletcher 2011), regenerative marketing (Kotler, Foglia, Sarkar 2023), restorative design (Antonelli 2019), sufficiency-based economy (Bocken et al. 2022) and post-industrial design (Cross 1981), expressions of a new approach to nature, seen as our ally and subject of an ethic of care (Gambardella et al. 2024).

Underlying all these reflections is the ambitious goal of redefining the concept of prosperity, hitherto understood almost exclusively in its economic sense, but instead indicating etymologically what is in keeping with hope, what is preferable for the future. The concept of prosperity therefore requires a new interpretation consisting of ‘a fundamental revision of the relationship between the economic and the social’ (Moore 2023), in a non-mercantile but relational prosperity (Latouche 2012).

The dimension of relationality is a fundamental component of a new conception of prosperity, conceived as a resource of both economic and human value, generated by a community within environmental and ethical constraints. This idea of prosperity has as its objective the ‘common good’ (Sandel 2021) not only of the community, understood as a group of people, but also of the trans-species, post-phenomnological (van Dongen 2019) and more-than-human (Wakkary 2021) relationships that coexist in it.

With its complexity, can fashion move beyond its singular profit-driven vision in order to develop the ideas of multi-faceted shared well-being? Can research into materials, processes, and fashion products shape new social and cultural models oriented towards prosperity? Can fashion be an example of this change that is capable of redirecting other knowledge and disciplines? Can the legal framework for sustainable development and the relevant legislation for the textile and fashion industries help drive the transition? Can fashion redirect the relationship between human and non-human, individual and territory, nature and technology? Can we move from the current ‘Fashion Prosperity’, understood as fashion’s pursuit of its economic growth, to ‘Prosperity Fashion’, a broad vision of the future and a transversal and contemporary focus on people, planet, economy, and technologies?

Based on these premises and questions, on 13 and 14 February 2025, Prosperity Fashion — the first international conference on fashion organised by Università degli Studi di Firenze — 

took place. The two days were enlivened by 94 contributions, selected through peer review, 147 speakers from 88 institutions around the world, 18 parallel sessions, and two keynote speakers—Kate Fletcher and Ron Wakkary—who spoke during the plenary session held in the Sala Bianca of Palazzo Pitti.

This special issue of Fashion Highlight Journal brings together a selection of the contributions presented during the conference, offering further reflection and insight into the oral presentations. This volume demonstrates the vitality and diversity of the themes addressed during Prosperity Fashion, serving as a concrete extension of the dialogue initiated during the conference.

References

  1. Antonelli, P. (2019). Broken Nature: Design Takes on Human Survival. Electa.
  2. Bocken, N. M. P., Niessen, L., & Short S. W. (2022). The Sufficiency-Based Circular Economy—An Analysis of 150
  3. Companies. Front. Sustain. 3:899289. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2022.899289.
  4. Cross, N. (1981). The coming of post-industrial design. Design Studies, 2(1), 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(81)90023-5.
  5. Fletcher, K. (2016). Craft of Use: Post-Growth Fashion. Routledge.
  6. Gambardella, C. (Ed.). (2024). For Nature/With Nature: New Sustainable Design Scenarios. Springer.
  7. Latouche, S. (2006). Le pari de la décroissance. Fayard.
  8. Moore, H., Davies, M., Mintchev, N., & Woodcraft, S. (Eds). (2023). Prosperity in the Twenty-First Century: Concepts, models and metrics. UCL Press.
  9. Sandel, M. (2021). The Tyranny of Merit: What’s Become of the Common Good?. Penguin Books.
  10. Sarkar, C., Kotler, P., & Foglia, E. (2023). Regeneration: The Future of Community in a Permacrisis World. Idea Bite Press.
  11. Stiglitz, J. (2009). GDP Fetishism. The Economists’ Voice, 6(8), 1-3.
  12. Van Dongen, P. (2019). A designer’s material-aesthetics reflections on fashion and technology. ArtEZ Press.
  13. Wakkary, R. (2021). Things We Could Design: For More Than Human-Centered Worlds. The MIT Press