Published 30-06-2026
Keywords
- Clothing sizing systems,
- Sociocultural body norms,
- Vanity sizing,
- Non-hierarchical language,
- Saussurean semiotics
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2026 Karmen Samson

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This Lexigraphy examines standardized clothing sizing systems through a semiotic lens, arguing that size labels are not neutral measurements but function as culturally charged signs. Drawing on Saussurean semiotics, sizing is analysed as a language in which labels operate through socially agreed conventions, producing meaning via differentiation rather than intrinsic reference. The Lexigraphy demonstrates how these conventions are deeply entangled with gendered body norms, particularly within womenswear, where size categories carry implicit judgments of desirability, value, and social acceptance. Historical and contemporary inconsistencies across global sizing systems further reveal the instability of both size labels and the measurements they claim to represent, exposing the tension between mathematical precision and semantic distortion. In response, the Lexigraphy proposes initial criteria for imagining alternative, non-hierarchical size languages that seek to decouple bodily measurement from value judgment. Ultimately, this research invites continued scholarly and creative engagement with sizing as a semiotic system, advocating for more inclusive approaches that respect the lived experience of the body.
References
- Abdoli, M., Scotto Rosato, M., Desousa, A., & Cotrufo, P. (2024). Cultural differences in body image: A systematic review. Social Sciences, 13(6), 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13060305
- Aydinoğlu, N. Z., & Krishna, A. (2012). Imagining thin: Why vanity sizing works. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(4), 565–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.12.001
- Barthes, R. (2010). The fashion system (M. Ward & R. Howard, Trans.). University of California Press. (Original work published 1967)
- Bishop, K., Gruys, K., & Evans, M. (2018). Sized out: Women, clothing size, and inequality. Gender & Society, 32(2), 180–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243217742940
- Bogusławska-Bączek, M. (2011). Analysis of the contemporary problem of garment sizes. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1514.8486
- Ferdinands, A. R., McHugh, T. L. F., Storey, K., et al. (2022). “We’re categorized in these sizes—that’s all we are”: Uncovering the social organization of young women’s weight work through media and fashion. BMC Public Health, 22, 1193. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13607-w
- Foucault, M. (1976). The history of sexuality, volume 1: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
- Hesse-Biber et al. (2006) examine the role of internalized misogyny in shaping perfectionism, the thin ideal, and disordered eating behaviors.
- Jackson, H. (2025, July 15). Hervé Léger’s bandage dress makes viral comeback: Is Gen Z reinforcing old beauty standards or rewriting them? WWD. https://wwd.com/pop-culture/culture-news/bandage-dress-revival-herve-leger-gen-z-depop-1237977151/
- Saussure, F. de. (1959). Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.; C. Bally & A. Sechehaye, Eds.). Philosophical Library. (Original work published 1916)
- Szabo, C. P., & Allwood, C. W. (2006). Body figure preference in South African adolescent females: A cross-cultural study. African Health Sciences, 6(4), 201–206. https://doi.org/10.5555/afhs.2006.6.4.201
- Wolf, N. (2002). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. Anchor Books.
