Contesting Meaning and Infrastructures of Agency in Contemporary Fashion: The Case of A Sewing Machine of One’s Own
Published 30-06-2026
Keywords
- Fashion activism,
- Cultural studies,
- Camp sensibility,
- Infrastructures of agency,
- Social design
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2026 Eleonora Cecere

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This paper examines how fashion design practices operate not only as systems of representation, but as material and semiotic infrastructures that shape the production and circulation of meaning. While vernacular aesthetics and subcultural codes are increasingly mobilised within contemporary fashion, their incorporation into broader circuits of visibility often transforms their symbolic charge. Rather than framing this process through oppositions such as authenticity versus co-optation, the study approaches meaning as an unstable and negotiated outcome.
The research adopts a practice-based, situated methodology, combining co-design, participant observation, and material analysis. It focuses on the case study A Sewing Machine of One’s Own, developed within a social tailoring atelier in Scampia (Naples), involving designers, seamstresses, and students in a collaborative production process. Through the analysis of garments, design decisions, and exhibition practices, the paper identifies specific operations—such as juxtaposition, citation, and visible construction—that foreground the instability of signs and prevent their naturalisation. These are interpreted through cultural studies and camp sensibility to examine how fashion practices can both engage with and destabilise processes of incorporation.
The study argues that fashion can assume a critical role not by representing contexts “authentically”, but by intervening in the material and relational conditions that enable forms of agency and ongoing renegotiation of meaning.
References
- Calefato, P. (2008). On myths and fashion: Barthes and cultural studies. Sign Systems Studies, 36(1), 71–82.
- Fuad-Luke, A. (2009). Design activism: Beautiful strangeness for a sustainable world. Earthscan.
- Gaugele, E., & Titton, M. (Eds.). (2019). Fashion and postcolonial critique. Sternberg Press.
- Gencarella, S. O. (2010). Gramsci, good sense, and critical folklore studies. Journal of Folklore Research, 47(3), 221–252.
- Greer, B. (2014). Craftivism: The art of craft and activism. Arsenal Pulp Press.
- Guareschi, M. (2023). Going underground: Stile, gusto e consumi nelle sottoculture giovanili. Agenzia X.
- Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79 (pp. 128–138). Hutchinson.
- Hall, S. (2006). Notes on deconstructing “the popular”. In M. G. Durham & D. M. Kellner (Eds.), Media and cultural studies: KeyWorks (pp. 477–487). Blackwell Publishing.
- Hall, S., & Jefferson, T. (Eds.). (2017). Rituali di resistenza: Teds, mods, skinheads e rastafariani. Subculture giovanili nella Gran Bretagna del dopoguerra (L. Benvenga, Ed.; L. Cocciolo & A. Giorgino, Trans.). NOVALOGOS/Ortica Editrice.
- Hebdige, D. (2002). Subculture: The meaning of style. Routledge. (Original work published 1979)
- Manzini, E. (2014). Making things happen: Social innovation and design. Design Issues, 30, 57–66.
- Mazzarella, F., Storey, H., & Williams, D. (2019). Counternarratives towards sustainability in fashion: Scoping an academic discourse on fashion activism through a case study on the Centre for Sustainable Fashion. The Design Journal, 22(sup1), 821–833.
- Monti, G. (2016). When fashion goes camp. In F. Cleto (Ed.), PopCamp (Vol. 2, pp. 597–615). Mimesis.
- Postolache, M. (2026, January 26). A sewing machine of one’s own as powerful hope for social communities. 33 Magazine. https://33magazine.com/2026/01/26/a-sewing-machine-of-ones-own-as-powerful-hope-for-social-communities/
- Sontag, S. (1964). Notes on “Camp”. Partisan Review, 31(4), 515–530.
- Vachhani, S. J., Bell, E., & Bristow, A. (2024). The affective micropolitics of craftivism: Organizing social change through the minor gesture. Organization Studies, 46(4), 525–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406241305752
- Woolf, V. (1929). A room of one’s own. Hogarth Press.
