Climate Change and Future Generations: Fairness, Political Catastrophe, and the Preservation of Just and Stable Institutions Over Time
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36253/rifp-3267Keywords:
Climate Justice, Institutional Intergenerational Sufficientarianism, Political Catastrophe, Limits to Inequalities, Environmental AuthoritarianismAbstract
This paper argues that anthropogenic climate change poses a fundamental threat to the objective conditions of justice and the stability of future political institutions directly and only indirectly to future individuals. In the spirit of Rawlsian theory, it defends a position of institutional intergenerational sufficientarianism, which holds that the political institutions in which present generations participate have a duty of justice to prevent future political catastrophes through immediate climate action now. Measures aimed at guaranteeing the objective conditions of justice for future institutions may carry significant distributive and political implications for liberal democracies, especially in terms of socioeconomic costs. Therefore, we advocate for climate policies that address socioeconomic inequalities while strengthening both the inclusiveness and effectiveness of democratic institutions.
Downloads
References
Alì, Nunzio. How Rich Should the 1% Be? Proportional Justice and Economic Inequality. New York/London: Routledge, 2022.
Alì, Nunzio, and Luigi Caranti. “How Much Economic Inequality is Fair in Liberal Democracies? The Approach of Proportional Justice.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 47 (2021): 769-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453720987865.
Andina, Tiziana. A Philosophy for Future Generations: The Structure and Dynamics of Trans-Generationality. UK: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022
Beeson, Mark. “The Coming of Environmental Authoritarianism.” Environmental Politics 19 (2010): 276-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010903576918.
Bonilla Xavier, and Marc Ivaldi. “ Banning short-haul domestic flights: A preliminary assessment for France.” Working Paper, N. 1482, The Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), October 2023.
Caney, Simon. “Human Rights, Responsibilities, and Climate Change.” In Global Basic Rights, 227-47. Edited by Charles Beitz and Robert Goodin. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Chancel, Lucas, Thomas Piketty, Emmanuel Saez, and Gabriel Zucman (eds). World Inequality Report 2022. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2022.
Corvino, Fausto. “Climate Change and the Circumstances of Justice.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Climate Change, 1065-81. Edited by Gianfranco Pellegrino and Marcello Di Paola. Cham: Springer Nature, 2023.
Corvino, Fausto. “Why a Uniform Carbon Tax Is Unjust, No Matter How the Revenue Is Used, and Should Be Accompanied by a Limitarian Carbon Tax.” Journal of Global Ethics 20 (2024): 56-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2024.2322168.
Corvino, Fausto. “What could justify a prohibition on the luxury emissions of the very rich?” Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 24 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X241307048.
Freeman, Samuel. Rawls. London: Routledge, 2007.
Fremstad, Anders, and Mark Paul. “The Impact of a Carbon Tax on Inequality.” Ecological Economics 163 (2019): 88-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.016.
Gardiner, Stephen. “Rawls and Climate Change: Does Rawlsian Political Philosophy Pass the Global Test?” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (2011): 125-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2011.529705.
Gaspart, Frédéric, and Axel Gosseries. “Are Generational Savings Unjust?” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 6 (2007)193-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X07073006.
Gosseries, Axel. What Is Intergenerational Justice? UK: Polity Press, 2023
Gosseries, Alex. “Nations, Generations and Climate Justice.” Global Policy 5 (2014): 96-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12112.
Hemmerich, Luca. “Intergenerational Domination.” The Journal of Ethics 29 (2024): 417-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-024-09498-1.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Edited by H. Lee and J. Romero. Geneva: IPCC, 2023
Karnein, Anja. “Climate Change and Justice Between Nonoverlapping Generations.” Global Justice: Theory, Practice, Rhetoric 8 (2015): 43-65. https://doi.org/10.21248/gjn.8.2.87.
Karnein, Anja. “Rawls and the Future: On the Possibility of Cooperation Across Time.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 50 (2022): 271-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12213.
Lewin, Micah. “Political Conception of Justice.” In The Cambridge Rawls Lexicon, 612-15. Edited by John Mandle and David Reidy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
Malleson, Tom. Against Inequality: The Practical and Ethical Case for Limitarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.
McKinnon, Catriona. Climate Change and Future Justice: Precaution, Compensation, and Triage. London: Routledge, 2012.
Meyer, Lukas H., and Pranay Sanklecha. “How Legitimate Expectations Matter in Climate Justice.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 13 (2014): 369-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X14541522.
Meyer, Lukas, and Thomas Pölzler. “Basic Needs and Sufficiency: The Foundations of Intergenerational Justice.” In The Oxford Handbook of Intergenerational Ethics. Edited by Stephen Gardiner. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190881931.013.23.
Mittiga, Ross. Climate Change as Political Catastrophe: Before Collapse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024.
Moellendorf, Darrel. The Moral Challenge of Dangerous Climate Change: Values, Poverty, and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Moellendorf, Darrel. Mobilizing Hope: Climate Change and Global Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022.
Moellendorf, Darrel. “Mobilizing Hope Against Pessimism and Plutocracy”. Ethics, Policy & Environment 27 (2024): 129-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2024.2306117.
Moellendorf, Darrel, and Axel Schaffer. “Equalizing the Intergenerational Burdens of Climate Change: An Alternative to Discounted Utilitarianism”. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 40 (2016): 43-62. https://doi.org/0.1111/misp.12046.
Oxfam. Carbon Inequality Kills: Why Curbing the Excessive Emissions of an Elite Few Can Create a Sustainable Planet for All. Oxford: Oxfam International, 2024.
Petroni, Lucas. “Every Climate Struggle Is a Political Struggle: New Trends in Climate Justice.” Brazilian Political Science Review 19 (2025): 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821202500020005.
Piroli, Diana. “Climate Justice, Recognition, Pluralism”. Brazilian Political Science Review 19 (2025): 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821202500010003.
Posner, Richard. Catastrophe: Risk and Response. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Povitkina, Maria. “The Limits of Democracy in Tackling Climate Change.” Environmental Politics 27 (2018): 411-32. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09644016.2018.1444723.
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice: A Restatement. Edited by Erin Kelly. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.
Reiff, Mark. “Hope in an Illiberal Age?” Ethics, Policy and Environment 27 (2024): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2024.2306115.
Robeyns, Ingrid. “Why Limitarianism?” The Journal of Political Philosophy 30 (2022): 249-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12275.
Roser, Dominic, and Christian Seidel. Climate Justice: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 2017.
Scheffler, Samuel. Why Worry About Future Generations? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Shue, Henry. “Subsistence and Luxury Emissions.” In Climate Ethics: Essential Readings, 200-15. Edited by Stephen Gardiner, Simon Caney, and Dale Jamieson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Shue, Henry. The Pivotal Generation: Why We Have a Moral Responsibility to Slow Climate Change Right Now. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2022
Tank, Lukas. “The Unfair Burdens Argument Against Carbon Pricing.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 37 (2020): 612-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12429.
Williges, Katharina, Lukas Meyer, Karl Steininger, and Gottfried Kirchengast. “Fairness Critically Conditions the Carbon Budget Allocation Across Countries.” Global Environmental Change 74 (2022): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102481.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Diana Piroli, Nunzio Alì

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

