REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ESTIMATION WITH NEURAL NETWORKS AND ERA5 REANALYSIS IN DATA-SPARSE REGIONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36253/ijam-3982

Keywords:

Pantanal, Amazon, Penman-Monteith-FAO56, Agricultural Meteorology, Trend analysis

Abstract

Reference evapotranspiration (ET0) is a fundamental hydrological variable for quantifying crop water requirements, conducting watershed water balance assessments, and optimizing irrigation management. However, the limited availability of high-quality meteorological data hinders the accurate determination of ET0 across most regions of Brazil. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate ET0 in areas lacking meteorological observations by employing ERA5 reanalysis climate data and artificial neural network (ANN) models, as well as to evaluate its spatial and temporal variability. Observational data from 32 automated weather stations in the State of Mato Grosso, Brazil, were utilized to estimate ET0 using the Penman-Monteith FAO56 method. These estimates were linked to ERA5 meteorological data, including global solar radiation and top-of-atmosphere radiation, using ANN models. The Mann-Kendall test was applied to detect trends in the ET0 time series for the period 1980–2019. In Mato Grosso, the Pantanal biome exhibited the highest ET0 values from October to March, followed by the Cerrado (Brazilian Savanna) and Amazon biomes. Statewide, the peak evapotranspirative demand occurred in August, September, and October, whereas April, May, and June recorded the lowest values. All biomes in Mato Grosso contained areas with statistically significant increasing trends in ET0. The proposed models demonstrated satisfactory error metrics for ET0 estimation, and the methodological approach enabled a robust assessment of the spatiotemporal dynamics of this hydrological variable, facilitating ET0 estimation even in data-scarce regions.

References

Abrishami, N., Sepaskhah, A. R., Shahrokhnia, M. H. (2019). Estimating wheat and maize daily evapotranspiration using artificial neural network. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 135(3-4), 945-958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2418-4

Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements (Irrigation and Drainage Paper, 56), FAO, Rome, pp. 300

ANA. (2020). Agência Nacional de Águas. Polos Nacionais de Irrigação: Mapeamento de Áreas Irrigadas com Imagens de Satélite. Brasília. https://cdn.agenciapeixevivo.org.br/media/2020/03/polos-nacionais-irriga%C3%A7%C3%A3o.pdf. Accessed January de 2023.

ANA. (2019). Agência Nacional de Águas. Levantamento da agricultura irrigada por pivôs centrais no Brasil. Brasília. https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/1121226/levantamento-da-agricultura-irrigada-por-pivos-centrais-no-brasil. Accessed November de 2023.

Asadi, S., Shahrabi, J., Abbaszadeh, P., and Tabanmehr, S. A. (2013). A new hybrid artificial neural networks for rainfall-runoff process modeling. Neurocomputing, 121(2013), 470-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2013.05.023

Barros, V.R., Souza, A.P., Fonseca, D.C., Silva, L.B.D. (2009). Avaliação da evapotranspiração de referência na Região de Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, utilizando lisímetro de pesagem e modelos matemáticos. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias, 4(2), 198-203.

https://doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v4i2a13

Biudes, M. S., Geli, H. M., Vourlitis, G. L., Machado, N. G., Pavão, V. M., dos Santos, L. O. F., Querino, C. A. S. (2022). Evapotranspiration seasonality over tropical ecosystems in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Remote Sensing, 14(10), 2482. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102482

Carvalho, M. Â. C. C. D., Uliana, E. M., Silva, D. D. D., Aires, U. R. V., Martins, C. A. D. S., Sousa Junior, M. F. , Cruz, I. F., Mendes, M. A. D. S. A. (2020). Drought monitoring based on remote sensing in a grain-producing region in the cerrado–amazon transition, Brazil. Water, 12(12), 3366. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123366

Copernicus Climate Change Service, (2017). ERA5: Fifth generation of ECMWF atmospheric reanalyses of the global climate. Copernicus Climate Change Service Climate Data Store (CDS), (date of access). Available at: <https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/home>. Access on january 2023.

Dai, L., Fu, R., Zhao, Z., Guo, X., Du, Y., Hu, Z., Cao, G. (2022). Comparison of Fourteen Reference Evapotranspiration Models With Lysimeter Measurements at a Site in the Humid Alpine Meadow, Northeastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.854196

Dias, L. C. P., Macedo, M. N., Costa, M. H., Coe, M. T., Neill, C. (2015). Effects of land cover change on evapotranspiration and streamflow of small catchments in the Upper Xingu River Basin, Central Brazil. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 4, 108-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.05.010

Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., Gupta, V. K. (1992). Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resour. Res. 28(4), 1015-1031. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR02985

Elbeltagi, A., Nagy, A., Mohammed, S., Pande, C. B., Kumar, M., Bhat, S. A., Zsembeli, J., Huzsvai, L., Tamás, J., Kovács, E., Harsányi, E., Juhász, C. (2022). Combination of Limited Meteorological Data for Predicting Reference Crop Evapotranspiration Using Artificial Neural Network Method. Agronomy, 12(2), 516. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020516

Gocić, M., Arab Amiri, M. (2021). Reference Evapotranspiration Prediction Using Neural Networks and Optimum Time Lags. Water Resources Management, 35(6), 1913-1926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02820-8

Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., Moore, R. (2017). Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202, 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031

Guo D., Westra S., Peterson T. (2022). Evapotranspiration: Modelling Actual, Potential and Reference Crop Evapotranspiration_. R package version 1.16. Available at: <https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Evapotranspiration>. Access on january 2023.

Guo, D., Westra, S., Maier, H. R. (2016). An R package for modelling actual, potential and reference evapotranspiration. Environmental Modelling & Software 78, 216-224.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.12.019

Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P. et al. (2020). The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 146(730), 1999-2049. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803

IBGE (2017). Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo Agropecuário 2017. Rio de Janeiro. https://censoagro2017.ibge.gov.br/. Accessed 14 November 2023.

Kling, H., Fuchs, M., & Paulin, M. (2012). Runoff conditions in the upper Danube basin under an ensemble of climate change scenarios. Journal of Hydrology, 424–425, 264–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.01.011

Laqui, W., Zubieta, R., Rau, P., Mejía, A., Lavado, W., Ingol, E. (2019). Can artificial neural networks estimate potential evapotranspiration in Peruvian highlands? Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 5(4), 1911-1924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00647-2

Lathuillière, M. J., Johnson, M. S., Donner, S. D. (2012). Water use by terrestrial ecosystems: temporal variability in rainforest and agricultural contributions to evapotranspiration in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Environmental Research Letters, 7(2), 024024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/2/024024

Liu, X., XU, C., Zhong, X., Li, Y.; Yuan, X.; Cao, J. (2017). Comparison of 16 models for reference crop evapotranspiration against weighing lysimeter measurement. Agricultural Water Management, 184, 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.01.017

Liu, G., Liu, Y., Hafeez, M., Xu, D., Vote, C. (2012). Comparison of two methods to derive time series of actual evapotranspiration using eddy covariance measurements in the southeastern Australia. Journal of Hydrology. 454–455, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.011

Morgan Uliana, E., de Abreu Araujo, J., Roggia Zanuzo, M., Guedes Araujo, A. H., Fomaca de Sousa Junior, M., Venâncio Aires, U. R., & Alves Ramos Filho, H. (2025). Estimation of Global Solar Radiation in Unmonitored Areas of Brazil Using ERA5 Reanalysis and Artificial Neural Networks. Atmosphere, 16(11), 1306.

Nouri, M.; Homaee, M. (2022). Reference crop evapotranspiration for data-sparse regions using reanalysis products. Agricultural Water Management, 262, 107319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107319

Pereira, A. R., Sediyama, G. C., Villa Nova, N. A. (2013). Evapotranspiração, Fundag, Campinas, pp. 323.

R Core Team (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: <https://www.R-project.org/>. Access on january 2023.

Ramos Filho, H. A.., Uliana, E. M., Aires, U. R. V., da Cruz, I. F., Lisboa, L., da Silva, D. D., Viola, M.R., Duarte, V. B. R. (2024). Nowcast flood predictions in the Amazon watershed based on the remotely sensed rainfall product PDIRnow and artificial neural networks. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 196(3), 245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-12396-6

Rodrigues, G. C., Braga, R. P. (2021). Estimation of Daily Reference Evapotranspiration from NASA POWER Reanalysis Products in a Hot Summer Mediterranean Climate. Agronomy, 11(10), 2077. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11102077

Sabino, M., Souza, A. P. (2023). Global Sensitivity of Penman–Monteith Reference Evapotranspiration to Climatic Variables in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Earth, 4(3), 714-727. https://doi.org/10.3390/earth4030038

Saha, A., Boughton, E. H., Li, H., Sonniér, G., Gomez‐Casanovas, N., Mcmillan, N., Zhang, X. (2022). Evapotranspiration in a subtropical wetland savanna using low‐cost lysimeter, eddy covariance and modelling approaches. Ecohydrology, 15(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2475

Santiago, A.V., Pereira, A.R., Folegatti, M.V., Maggiotto, S.R. (2002). Evapotranspiração de referência medida por lisímetro de pesagem e estimada por Penman-Monteith (FAO-56), nas escalas mensal e decendial. Revista Brasileira de Agrometeorologia, 10(1), 57-66.

Silva, E. H. F. M., Hoogenboom, G., Boote, J., Gonçalves, A. O., Marin, F. R. (2022). Predicting soybean evapotranspiration and crop water productivity for a tropical environment using the CSM-CROPGRO-Soybean model. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 323, 109075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109075

Sousa Jr, M. F., Uliana, E. M., Aires, R. V. U., Rápalo, L. M. C., da Silva, D. D., Moreira, M. C., Lisboa, L., da Silva Rondon, D. (2024). Streamflow prediction based on machine learning models and rainfall estimated by remote sensing in the Brazilian Savanna and Amazon biomes transition. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 10(1), 1191-1202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-023-01837-9

Souza, A. P., Tanaka, A. A., da Silva, A. C., Uliana, E. M., de Almeida, F. T., Gomes, A. W. A., Klar, A. E. (2016). Reference evapotranspiration by Penman–Monteith FAO 56 with missing data of global radiation. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia de Biossistemas, 10(2), 217-233. https://doi.org/10.18011/bioeng2016v10n2p217-233

Souza, A. P., de Almeida, F. T., Arantes, K. R., Martim, C. C., da Silva, J. O. (2015). Coeficientes de Tanque Classe A para estimativa da evapotranspiração de referência diária na região de transição Cerrado-Amazônica. Scientia Plena, 11(5).

Tari, A. F., Nacar, M. S., Nacar, A. S., Akin, S. (2022). Comparison of some evapotranspiration models using lysimeter measurements in arid climate conditions. Irrigation and Drainage, 71(4), 948-958. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2707

Tian, Y., Zhang, K., Xu, Y., Gao, X., Wang, J. (2018). Evaluation of Potential Evapotranspiration Based on CMADS Reanalysis Dataset over China. Water, 10(9), 1126, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091126

Uliana, E. M., Aires, U. R. V., de Sousa Junior, M. F., da Silva, D. D., Moreira, M. C., da Cruz, I. F., Araujo, H. B. (2024). Estimated evaporation of lakes by climate reanalysis data and artificial neural networks. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 136, 104811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2024.104811

Valle Júnior, L. C. G. D., Vourlitis, G. L., Curado, L. F. A., Palácios, R. D. S., Nogueira, J. D. S., Lobo, F. D. A., Islam, A. R. M. T., Rodrigues, T. R. (2021). Evaluation of FAO-56 procedures for estimating reference evapotranspiration using missing climatic data for a Brazilian tropical savanna. Water, 13(13), 1763. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13131763

Van Liew, M. W., Veith, T. L., Bosch, D. D., and Arnold, J. G. (2007). Suitability of SWAT for the conservation effects assessment project: a comparison on USDA-ARS watersheds. J. Hydrol. Eng. 12(2), 173-189. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:2(173)

Walls, S., Binns, A. D., Levison, J.; Macritchie, S. (2020). Prediction of actual evapotranspiration by artificial neural network models using data from a Bowen ratio energy balance station. Neural Computing and Applications, 32(17), 14001-14018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04800-2

Woldesenbet, T. A., Elagib, N. A. (2021). Spatial‐temporal evaluation of different reference evapotranspiration methods based on the climate forecast system reanalysis data. Hydrological Processes, 35(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14239

Xiong, Y., Chen, X., Tang, L., Wang, H. (2022). Comparison of surface renewal and Bowen ratio derived evapotranspiration measurements in an arid vineyard. Journal of Hydrology, 613, 128474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.12847

Yan, H., Li, M., Zhang, C., Zhang, J., Wang, G., Yu, J., Ma, J., Zhao, S. (2022). Comparison of evapotranspiration upscaling methods from instantaneous to daytime scale for tea and wheat in southeast China. Agricultural Water Management, 264, 107464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107464

Downloads

Published

2026-09-09

How to Cite

Morgan Uliana, E., Ricardo Venâncio Aires, U., Fomaca de Sousa Junior, M., David da Silva, D., Ribeiro Viola, M., Santos Silva Amorim, R., … Picalho Leal, M. (2026). REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ESTIMATION WITH NEURAL NETWORKS AND ERA5 REANALYSIS IN DATA-SPARSE REGIONS. Italian Journal of Agrometeorology. https://doi.org/10.36253/ijam-3982

Issue

Just Accepted Manuscripts

Section

REVIEW AND RESEARCH ARTICLES

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Eduardo Morgan Uliana, Uilson Ricardo Venâncio Aires, Marionei Fomaca de Sousa Junior, Demetrius David da Silva, Marcelo Ribeiro Viola, Ricardo Santos Silva Amorim, Kelte Resende Arantes, Marcio Roggia Zanuzo, Herval Alves Ramos Filho, Matheus Picalho Leal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Licence and copyright agreement for IJAM

(revised October 2020)

The following licence and copyright agreement is valid for any article published by IJAM.

Author’s certification

By submitting the manuscript, the authors certify the following:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or proceedings-type publication – including discussion papers – or as part of a published lecture or thesis); it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; and its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work was carried out.
  • They have secured the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following licence and copyright agreement:

Copyright

  • The copyright of any article is retained by the author(s). More information on the transfer of copyright can be found below.
  • Authors grant our journals a licence to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.
  • Authors grant any third party the right to use the article freely under the stipulation that the original authors are given credit and the appropriate citation details are mentioned.
  • The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License

Anyone is free to share — to copy, distribute, and transmit the work to remix — to adapt the work under the following conditions:

  • Attribution — The original authors must be given credit.
  • For any reuse or distribution, it must be made clear to others what the licence terms of this work are.
  • Any of these conditions can be waived if the copyright holders give permission.
  • Nothing in this licence impairs or restricts the author’s moral rights. The full legal code of this licence.

 

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.