No. 1 (2023)
Essays

Knitting out the Touch Hunger: A Research Project to Design the Overcoming of Post-Pandemic Emotional Fear of Touching

PDF
  • Martina Motta,
  • Giovanni Maria Conti
Martina Motta
Politecnico di Milano
Giovanni Maria Conti
Politecnico di Milano
first number yellow cover of fashion highlight journal with black logo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/fh-2264

Published 30-06-2023

Keywords

  • Textile Design,
  • Knit Design,
  • Touch,
  • Human Feelings,
  • Post-Pandemic Behaviors

How to Cite

Motta, M., & Conti, G. M. (2023). Knitting out the Touch Hunger: A Research Project to Design the Overcoming of Post-Pandemic Emotional Fear of Touching. Fashion Highlight, (1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.36253/fh-2264
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The pandemic has altered human attitudes affecting common gestures: hugs, kisses, hands shaking, all the human behaviors related to touching have become dangerous, generating what scientists called “touch hunger”. If with touch we define ourselves as our form of being in the world we are in front of complex touch-related costs that make people today feel lost and distant. Starting from this premise, the research team in the knit design of ***affiliation*** has been working to relate scientific data and innovative design languages to help people in redefining and rediscover the human attitudes that connect us with others. Exploiting digital technologies, innovative materials, and tactile surfaces belonging to the world of knitwear and textiles, researchers designed an emotional and sensorial journey to guide participants in overcoming the fear of touching, finding new possible ways of being together.

PDF

References

  1. Baldini, A., & Pietrucci, P. (2017). Knitting a Community Back Together: Spontaneous Public Art as Citizenship Engagement in Post- Earthquake L’Aquila. In Iannelli, L., Musarò, P. Territories of Political Participation. Public Art, Urban Design, and Performative Citizenship. Mimesis International.
  2. Banerjee, D., Vasquez, V., Pecchio, M., Hegde, M. L., Jagannatha, R. Ks., & Sathyanarayana Rao, T. S. (2021). RETRACTED: Biopsychosocial
  3. intersections of social/affective touch and psychiatry: Implications of ‘touch hunger’ during COVID-19. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 0(0), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764021997485
  4. Field, T. (2014). Touch (2nd ed.). The MIT Press.
  5. Fiorani, E. (2003). La nuova condizione di vita. Lavoro. corpo, territorio. Lupetti.
  6. Fiorani, E. (2021). Scintille di umanità. Lupetti.
  7. Flusser, V. (1993). Filosofia del Design. Bruno Mondadori.
  8. Ghilardi, M. (2016). Pluralità del “corpo”. In A. Gatti (ed.) Corpo e significato, n°5 (pp. 61-83). Mimesis Edizioni.
  9. Green, L., & Moran, L. (2021). Covid-19, social distancing and the ‘scientistic’ of touch: Exploring the changing social and emotional
  10. contexts of touch and their implications for social work. Qualitative Social Work, 20(1–2), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325020973321
  11. Greer, B. (2008). Knitting for Good. A guide to create Personal, Social an Political Change, Stitch by Stitch. Trumpeter Books.
  12. Hertenstein, M. J., Keltner, D., App, B., Bulleit, B. A., & Jaskolka, A. R. (2006). Touch communicates distinct emotions. Emotion.6(3), 528-33. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.3.528.
  13. Maggiore, V. (2016). Il corpo come strumento della sensibilità: riflessioni sul conoscere e il sentire fra estetica e fisiologia. In A. Gatti (ed.), Corpo e significato, n° 5 (pp. 85-105). Mimesis Edizioni.
  14. Manzini, E. (2022). Fashion as diversity and care. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 18(1), 463–465.
  15. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Fenomenologia della percezione Bompiani.
  16. Nietzsche, F.W. (2005). Così parlò Zarathustra. Bur.
  17. Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional Design. Apogeo.
  18. Perna, G., Cuniberti, F., Daccò, S., Nobile, M., & Caldirola, D. (2020). Impact of respiratory protective devices on respiration: Implications for panic vulnerability during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Affect Disorders, 1(277), 772-778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.015.
  19. Prigoda, E., & McKenzie, P. (2007). Purls of wisdom: A collectivist study of human information behavior in a public library knitting group. Journal of Documentation, 63(1), 90 – 114.
  20. Richards, R., (2007) Everyday Creativity and the Arts, World Futures, vol. 63, no. 7, 500-525
  21. Ruggeri, V. (2004) Per un’estetica dell’esperienza tattile. Un approccio psicofisiologico. Proceedings of L’arte a portata di mano. Verso una pedagogia di accesso ai beni culturali senza barriere, Portonovo, Ancona October 12-13. p. 48. Armando Editore.
  22. Vammacigna, K. (2022, January 10). Le ragioni del corpo e della terra in Nietzsche. Il pensiero storico. https://ilpensierostorico.com/le-ragioni-del-corpo-e-della-terra-in-nietzsche/
  23. Vitta, M. (2016). Le voci delle cose. Progetto, idea, destino. Piccola Biblioteca Einaudi.
  24. Von Mohr, M., Kirsch, L. P., & Fotopoulou, A. (2021) Social touch deprivation during COVID-19: effects on psychological wellbeing and craving interpersonal touch. R Soc Open Sci, 8(9), 210287. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210287.
  25. Wang, C., Pan, R., Wan, X., Tan, Y., Xu, L., Ho, C. S., & Ho, R. C. (2020). Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China. International Journal Environ Res Public Health, 17(5), 1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051729.

Most read articles by the same author(s)