No. SI1 (2025): Special Issue
Essays

Meaning before Making: How digital tools might enable material and immaterial value for sustainable design

Rosemary Wallin
University of Westminster

Published 14-07-2025

Keywords

  • Keywords: value, sustainable design, digital fashion, propositional design, technology.

How to Cite

Wallin, R. (2025). Meaning before Making: How digital tools might enable material and immaterial value for sustainable design. Fashion Highlight, (SI1), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.36253/fh-3138

Abstract

This paper explores the use of propositional design and digital tools for sustainable material and immaterial value creation in fashion design. Stuart Walker argues that within the current capitalist system, it is ‘virtually impossible for the discipline of design to effectively and substantially address the interrelated issues of environmental responsibility, social obligation and personal meaning’ (Walker, 2013). Propositional design objects are not design solutions but are concerned with ‘challenging conventions, positing questions, and offering directions for reform.’ Walker calls this ‘non-commercial, academic, research-based designing’ (Walker, 2013) propositional design. Alongside the increasing drive for more sustainable systems for fashion, digital tools have begun to change the way that fashion design is enacted. There has been a significant shift from the traditional physical craft skills of pattern cutting and sewing, to the use of software and digital spaces, used in tandem with the traditional fashion design studio environment. Software such as CLO3D allows for accurate patterns to be created digitally, emailed, and exported anywhere with an internet connection. Together with the changing context of the fashion industry and the growing desire to reduce waste, lower consumption, and redefine our relationship to clothes, these digital spaces provide new ways of thinking about and creating value. Propositional design approaches free the fashion designer to venture beyond aesthetics into systems-led thinking for radical sustainable change.

References

  1. Berglin, L., Cederwall, S. L., Hallnas, L., Jonsson, B., Kvaal, A. K., Lotta Lundstedt, Nordstrom, M., Peterson, B., & Thornquist, C. (2008). Interaction design methods in fashion design teaching. The Nordic Textile Journal, 26–51.
  2. Binder, T. & [et al.]. (2011). Design things / A. Telier, Thomas Binder ... [Et al.]. MIT Press.
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1986). Forms of Capital: General Sociology, Volume 3: Lectures at the Collège de France 1983 – 84: General Sociology, Volume 3: Lectures at the Collège de France 1983 - 84 (P. Collier, Trans.; 1st edition). Polity.
  4. Chapman, J. (2005). Emotionally durable design objects, experiences and empathy. Earthscan.
  5. Churchman, C. W. (1967). Wicked Problems. Management Science, 4(14).
  6. Dubberly, H. (2017). Connecting Things: Broadening design to include systems, platforms and product service ecologies. In Encountering Things: Design and Theories of Things. Bloomsbury.
  7. Evans, C. (2014, May 2). Dead Man’s Clothes. Esquire: The Big Black Book, 3. http://www.esquire.co.uk/style/fashion/6231/dead-mans-clothes/
  8. Glenn, J., & Walker, R. (2009). About the Significant Objects Project | Significant Objects. https://significantobjects.com/about/
  9. Hodder, I. (2012). Entangled: An archaeology of the relationships between humans and things / Ian Hodder. Wiley-Blackwell.
  10. Lewitt, S. (1982). Wall Drawing/356. Tate. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/lewitt-no-title-p77018
  11. Marvellous Designer. (2024). Marvelous Designer. Marvelous Designer Official Site. https://www.marvelousdesigner.com/product/marvelousdesigner.com
  12. Moles, A. A. (1995). Design and Immateriality: What of it in a Post Industrial Society. In The Idea of Design Editors: Margolin, Victor; Buchanan, Richard. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  13. Niinimaki, K. (2010). Forming sustainable attachment to clothes. 4–7.
  14. Niinimäki, K., & Armstrong, C. (2013). From pleasure in use to preservation of meaningful memories: A closer look at the sustainability of clothing via longevity and attachment. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 6(3), 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2013.825737
  15. Niinimaki, K., & Karell, E. (2020). A Mixed-Method Study of Design Practices and Designers’ Roles in Sustainable-Minded Clothing Companies—ProQuest. Sustainability, 12(11), 4680. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2412471596?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14987
  16. Pan, Y., & Blevis, E. (2014, June). Fashion thinking: Lessons from fashion and sustainable interaction design, concepts and issues. Designing Interactive Systems.
  17. Stallybrass, P. (1993). Stallybrass P (1993) Worn worlds: Clothes, mourning, and the life of things. The Yale Review 81(2): 35–74. The Yale Review, 81(2), 35–74.
  18. Stephen Walters & Sons. (2024). Home. Stephen Walters and Sons. http://stephenwalters.co.uk/
  19. Stewart, S. (1992). On Longing: Narratives of the Miniature, the Gigantic, the Souvenir, the Collection (6th Printing edition). Duke University Press Books.
  20. The Economist. (2017, May 6). The world’s most valuable resource is no longer oil, but data. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2017/05/06/the-worlds-most-valuable-resource-is-no-longer-oil-but-data
  21. The Fabricant. (2024). thefabricant.com
  22. Tilley, C. (2001). Ethnography and Material Culture. In Handbook of ethnography / edited by Paul Atkinson ... [Et al.]. (pp. 258–272). SAGE.
  23. Turkle, S. (2007). Evocative objects things we think with. MIT.
  24. Walker, S. (2013). Imagination’s Promise: Practice-based design research for sustainability. In Handbook of Design for Sustainability (pp. 446–465). Berg Publishers.