No. SI1 (2025): Special Issue
Essays

Grow Me a Wardrobe: How three-dimensional Biofabrication strategies for Bacterial Cellulose can reframe fashion practices through making and interacting with non-archetypal Bacterial Cellulose-based wearable objects

Pdf
  • Carolina De Lara,
  • Daijiro Mizuno
Carolina De Lara
Kyoto Institute of Technology
Bio
Daijiro Mizuno
Kyoto Institute of Technology
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/fh-3039

Published 14-07-2025

Keywords

  • bacterial cellulose,
  • biofabrication,
  • three-dimensional growth strategies,
  • Regenerative Fashion Systems,
  • Multispecies Interdisciplinary Design

How to Cite

De Lara, C., & Mizuno, D. (2025). Grow Me a Wardrobe: How three-dimensional Biofabrication strategies for Bacterial Cellulose can reframe fashion practices through making and interacting with non-archetypal Bacterial Cellulose-based wearable objects. Fashion Highlight, (SI1), 246–256. https://doi.org/10.36253/fh-3039

Copyright (c) 2025 Carolina De Lara, Daijiro Mizuno

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

With the world in a state of climate emergency, fashion faces significant challenges due to its massive environmental and cultural influence. Clothing accounts for over 60% of textiles, with production doubled whilst use has declined by 40%(Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2017). Existing linear supply chains leave significant ecological impacts, with waste being a predominant factor. Rissanen (2013) estimates that 15% of fashion waste occurs during garment assembly. Given the complexity of textile and fashion industries parallel to rising environmental degradation, multilevel solutions are crucial to ease environmental strain. 

This study aims to bridge the gap between fashion and textiles by employing bacterial cellulose growth patterns to create textiles imbued with fashion attributes, focusing on form as the main designable quality. Fabrication is recorded and evaluated through contextualisation during body-artefact juxtaposition in workshop contexts, aided by visual and written documentation.

The output consists of two artefact series illustrating proposed biofabrication methods bridging fashion and textiles, augmented by a revised methodological flow informed by resulting design process and material outcomes. Contextualising biofabrication in practice and prolonged interaction expands possible ways of making, dressing and embodying unconventional aesthetics, resulting in more prosper forms of fashion.

Pdf

References

  1. Aldrich, W. (2020). Metric pattern cutting for women’s wear (6th ed.). John Wiley.
  2. Ahmed, I., Berg, A., D’Auria, G., Balchandani, A., Rölkens, F., Barrelet, D., Grunberg, J., Kersnar, J., de Blanche, A., Crump, H., Starzynska, E. & Bain, M. (2023) “The State of Fashion 2024: Riding Out the Storm.” The Business of Fashion, The Business of Fashion, 29 November 2023. Available at: https://www.businessoffashion.com/reports/news-analysis/the-state-of-fashion-2024-report-bof-mckinsey
  3. Arnardottir, T.H., Dade-Robertson, M., Zhang, Meng and Loh, Joshua (2022) Living manufacture: Principles for a microbial 3D printer. In: Structures and Architecture: A Viable Urban Perspective? : Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Structures and Architecture (ICSA 2022). Structures and Architecture . CRC Press, London, pp. 59-66. ISBN 9781003023555
  4. Arnardottir, T.H., Dade-Robertson, M., Mitrani, H., Zhang, M., & Christgen, B. (2021). Turbulent casting. ACADIA Proceedings, 1, 300–309. https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.acadia.2020.1.300
  5. Biofabricate and Fashion for Good (2020) UNDERSTANDING ‘BIO’ MATERIAL INNOVATION: a primer for the fashion industry. Available at: https://reports.fashionforgood.com/ [Accessed: 10 October 2024]
  6. Crawford, A. (2023) Designer’s Guide to Lab Practice. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
  7. Camere, S., Karana, E. (2017). Growing materials for product design. In: Alive. Active. Adaptive: Proceedings of International Conference on Experiential Knowledge and Emerging Materials (EKSIG 2017) (pp. 101-115). Delft: TU Delft Open.
  8. De Lara, C. (2024). BACTERIAL BRICKBATS: Material-Driven Explorations of Bacterial Cellulose-Knit Textile Composites Challenging Agential Anthropocentrism Within Design. (Master thesis). The Swedish School of Textiles, Borås.
  9. Derme, T., Mitterberger, D., & Di Tanna, U. (2016). Growth based fabrication techniques for bacterial cellulose: Three-dimensional grown membranes and scaffolding design for biological polymers. ACADIA Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.acadia.2016.488
  10. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2017) A new textiles economy: Redesigning fashion’s future. Available at: http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications [Accessed: 27 July 2024].
  11. Gaver, B., & Bowers, J. (2012). Annotated portfolios. Interactions, 19(4), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212877.2212889
  12. Giaccardi, E., & Karana, E. (2015). Foundations of Materials experience. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2447–2456. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702337
  13. Groutars, E. G., Kim, R., & Karana, E. (2024). Designing Living Artefacts for Multispecies Interactions: An Ecological Approach. International Journal of Design, 18(2), 59-78. https://doi.org/10.57698/v18i2.04
  14. Karana, E., Barati, B., & Giaccardi, E. (2020). Living artefacts: Conceptualizing livingness as a material quality in everyday artefacts. International Journal of Design, 14(3), 37-53.
  15. Koskinen, I. K., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redström, J., & Wensveen, S. A. G. (2011). Design research through practice: from the lab, field, and showroom. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385502-2.00015-8
  16. Markussen, T. (2017). Building theory through design. Practice-Based Design Research, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474267830.ch-009
  17. Mikulčić, H., Baleta, J., Wang, X., Duić, N., & Dewil, R. (2022). Sustainable development in period of Climate Crisis. Journal of Environmental Management, 303, 114271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114271P
  18. Phan, H. N., Nguyen, T. T., & Okubayashi, S. (2024). Textile finishing for bacterial cellulose modification: organic acid-catalyzed cellulosic acetylation. The Journal of The Textile Institute, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2024.2352178
  19. Rissanen, T. (2013). ZERO-WASTE FASHION DESIGN: A study at the intersection of cloth, fashion design and pattern cutting. Ph. D Thesis. University of Technology Sydney. Available at: https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/
  20. Ritter, M. (2021). Postphenomenological method and technological things themselves. Human Studies, 44(4), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-021-09603-5
  21. Rosenberger, R., & Verbeek, P. P. C. C. (Ed.) (2015). Postphenomenological Investigations: Essays on Human-Technology Relations. (Postphenomenology and the Philosophy of Technology). Lexington Books.
  22. Turhan, G. D., Afsar, S., Ozel, B., Doyuran, A., Varinlioglu, G., & Bengisu, M. (2022). 3D printing with bacterial cellulose-based bioactive composites for design applications. eCAADe Proceedings, 1, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2022.1.077
  23. Wakkary, R. (2021). Things we could design: For more than human-centered worlds. The MIT Press.
  24. van der Zwan, S., Smith, M., Bruineberg, J., Lévy, P., and Hummels, C. (2020) Philosophy at work: Postphenomenology as a generative lens in design research and practice, in Boess, S., Cheung, M. and Cain, R. (eds.), Synergy - DRS International Conference 2020, 11-14 August, Held online. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2020.337