What is Enlightenment Today?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36253/rifp-4040Keywords:
Kant, Enlightenment, post-truth era, economic inequality, democracyAbstract
This paper examines the meaning of Enlightenment in the contemporary “post-truth” era. Starting with examples of mass credulity and misinformation, it argues that contemporary obscurantism differs from that faced by eighteenth-century thinkers because it is generated not by a lack of information but by an overabundance of information combined with echo chambers and the rejection of scientific authority. The paper revisits Immanuel Kant’s classic conception of Enlightenment as the individual’s emergence from self-incurred immaturity through the courageous use of one’s own understanding. It then considers Marina Garcés’ proposal, strongly influenced by Kant, of a “new radical Enlightenment.” While acknowledging the relevance of Kantian critical reason for a new Enlightenment, the paper argues that Kant’s framework is insufficient to address the structural conditions that undermine public discourse today. In particular, growing economic inequality and the influence of wealth over public debate distort democratic deliberation and weaken the corrective power of rational argument. The paper concludes that a contemporary Enlightenment must move beyond Kantian reliance on free public reasoning by confronting the material inequalities that undermine democratic legitimacy and by reimagining political strategies to restore trust, equality, and democratic participation.
Downloads
References
Alì, Nunzio, and Luigi Caranti. “How Much Economic Inequality Is Fair in Liberal Democracies? The Approach of Proportional Justice.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 47, no. 7 (2021): 769–88.
Alì, Nunzio, and Alessandro Pinzani. “Taking Economic Inequality Seriously: Kantian Views.” In Kant and the Problem of Politics: Rethinking the Contemporary World, edited by Luigi Caranti and Alessandro Pinzani, 87–110. London: Routledge, 2022.
Beiser, Frederick C. Enlightenment, Revolution, and Romanticism: The Genesis of German Political Thought, 1790–1800.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
Christiano, Thomas. “Money in Politics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy, edited by David Estlund, 241–57. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Davies, Luke J. “Kant on Welfare: Five Unsuccessful Defences.” Kantian Review 25, no. 1 (2020): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136941541900044X.
Fleischacker, Samuel. What Is Enlightenment? London: Routledge, 2013.
Garcés, Marina. New Radical Enlightenment. London-New York: Verso, 2024.
Gilens, Martin, and Benjamin I. Page. Democracy in America? What Has Gone Wrong and What We Can Do About It. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.
Gilens, Martin, and Benjamin I. Page. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives on Politics 12, no. 3 (2014): 564–81.
Habermas, Jürgen. Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats.Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1992.
Habermas, Jürgen. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1981.
Habermas, Jürgen. “The Unity of Reason in the Diversity of Its Voices.” In What Is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions, edited by James Schmidt, 399–425. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.
Kant, Immanuel. “An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?” In Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by Mary J. Gregor, 11–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Kant, Immanuel. “The Conflict of the Faculties.” In Religion and Rational Theology, translated and edited by Allen W. Wood and George di Giovanni, 233–327. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Edited by Paul Guyer. Translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Kant, Immanuel. “The Metaphysics of Morals.” In Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by Mary J. Gregor, 353–603. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Kant, Immanuel. “On the Common Saying: That May Be Correct in Theory, but It Is of No Use in Practice.” In Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by Mary J. Gregor, 273–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Oxfam Italia. Nel baratro della disuguaglianza: Come uscirne e prendersi cura della democrazia. Report Davos, 2026.
Ripstein, Arthur. Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009. (vedi nota sull’editore sopra)
Sánchez Madrid, Nuria. Kant on Social Suffering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2025.
Schmidt, James, ed. What Is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.
Zucman, Gabriel. A Blueprint for a Coordinated Minimum Effective Taxation Standard for Ultra-High-Net-Worth Individuals. EU Tax Observatory, 2024. https://gabriel-zucman.eu/files/report-g20.pdf.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Luigi Caranti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
