Cambiamento climatico e generazioni future: Equità, catastrofe politica e preservazione di istituzioni giuste e stabili nel tempo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36253/rifp-3267Parole chiave:
giustizia climatica, sufficientarismo istituzionale intergenerazionale, catastrofe politica, limiti alle disuguaglianze, autoritarismo ambientaleAbstract
Questo articolo sostiene che il cambiamento climatico antropogenico rappresenti una minaccia fondamentale alle condizioni oggettive di giustizia e alla stabilità delle istituzioni politiche future in modo diretto, e solo indirettamente agli individui futuri. Nello spirito della teoria rawlsiana, difende una posizione di sufficientarismo istituzionale intergenerazionale, secondo cui le istituzioni politiche a cui partecipano le generazioni attuali hanno un dovere di giustizia di prevenire future catastrofi politiche attraverso azioni immediate a favore del clima. Le misure volte a garantire le condizioni oggettive di giustizia per le istituzioni future possono avere implicazioni distributive e politiche significative per le democrazie liberali, soprattutto in termini di costi socioeconomici. Pertanto, sosteniamo politiche climatiche che affrontino le disuguaglianze socioeconomiche rafforzando al contempo l’inclusività e l’efficacia delle istituzioni democratiche.
Downloads
Riferimenti bibliografici
Alì, Nunzio. How Rich Should the 1% Be? Proportional Justice and Economic Inequality. New York/London: Routledge, 2022.
Alì, Nunzio, and Luigi Caranti. “How Much Economic Inequality is Fair in Liberal Democracies? The Approach of Proportional Justice.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 47 (2021): 769-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453720987865.
Andina, Tiziana. A Philosophy for Future Generations: The Structure and Dynamics of Trans-Generationality. UK: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022
Beeson, Mark. “The Coming of Environmental Authoritarianism.” Environmental Politics 19 (2010): 276-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010903576918.
Bonilla Xavier, and Marc Ivaldi. “ Banning short-haul domestic flights: A preliminary assessment for France.” Working Paper, N. 1482, The Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), October 2023.
Caney, Simon. “Human Rights, Responsibilities, and Climate Change.” In Global Basic Rights, 227-47. Edited by Charles Beitz and Robert Goodin. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Chancel, Lucas, Thomas Piketty, Emmanuel Saez, and Gabriel Zucman (eds). World Inequality Report 2022. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2022.
Corvino, Fausto. “Climate Change and the Circumstances of Justice.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Climate Change, 1065-81. Edited by Gianfranco Pellegrino and Marcello Di Paola. Cham: Springer Nature, 2023.
Corvino, Fausto. “Why a Uniform Carbon Tax Is Unjust, No Matter How the Revenue Is Used, and Should Be Accompanied by a Limitarian Carbon Tax.” Journal of Global Ethics 20 (2024): 56-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2024.2322168.
Corvino, Fausto. “What could justify a prohibition on the luxury emissions of the very rich?” Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 24 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X241307048.
Freeman, Samuel. Rawls. London: Routledge, 2007.
Fremstad, Anders, and Mark Paul. “The Impact of a Carbon Tax on Inequality.” Ecological Economics 163 (2019): 88-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.016.
Gardiner, Stephen. “Rawls and Climate Change: Does Rawlsian Political Philosophy Pass the Global Test?” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (2011): 125-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2011.529705.
Gaspart, Frédéric, and Axel Gosseries. “Are Generational Savings Unjust?” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 6 (2007)193-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X07073006.
Gosseries, Axel. What Is Intergenerational Justice? UK: Polity Press, 2023
Gosseries, Alex. “Nations, Generations and Climate Justice.” Global Policy 5 (2014): 96-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12112.
Hemmerich, Luca. “Intergenerational Domination.” The Journal of Ethics 29 (2024): 417-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-024-09498-1.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Edited by H. Lee and J. Romero. Geneva: IPCC, 2023
Karnein, Anja. “Climate Change and Justice Between Nonoverlapping Generations.” Global Justice: Theory, Practice, Rhetoric 8 (2015): 43-65. https://doi.org/10.21248/gjn.8.2.87.
Karnein, Anja. “Rawls and the Future: On the Possibility of Cooperation Across Time.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 50 (2022): 271-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12213.
Lewin, Micah. “Political Conception of Justice.” In The Cambridge Rawls Lexicon, 612-15. Edited by John Mandle and David Reidy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
Malleson, Tom. Against Inequality: The Practical and Ethical Case for Limitarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.
McKinnon, Catriona. Climate Change and Future Justice: Precaution, Compensation, and Triage. London: Routledge, 2012.
Meyer, Lukas H., and Pranay Sanklecha. “How Legitimate Expectations Matter in Climate Justice.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 13 (2014): 369-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X14541522.
Meyer, Lukas, and Thomas Pölzler. “Basic Needs and Sufficiency: The Foundations of Intergenerational Justice.” In The Oxford Handbook of Intergenerational Ethics. Edited by Stephen Gardiner. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190881931.013.23.
Mittiga, Ross. Climate Change as Political Catastrophe: Before Collapse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024.
Moellendorf, Darrel. The Moral Challenge of Dangerous Climate Change: Values, Poverty, and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Moellendorf, Darrel. Mobilizing Hope: Climate Change and Global Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022.
Moellendorf, Darrel. “Mobilizing Hope Against Pessimism and Plutocracy”. Ethics, Policy & Environment 27 (2024): 129-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2024.2306117.
Moellendorf, Darrel, and Axel Schaffer. “Equalizing the Intergenerational Burdens of Climate Change: An Alternative to Discounted Utilitarianism”. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 40 (2016): 43-62. https://doi.org/0.1111/misp.12046.
Oxfam. Carbon Inequality Kills: Why Curbing the Excessive Emissions of an Elite Few Can Create a Sustainable Planet for All. Oxford: Oxfam International, 2024.
Petroni, Lucas. “Every Climate Struggle Is a Political Struggle: New Trends in Climate Justice.” Brazilian Political Science Review 19 (2025): 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821202500020005.
Piroli, Diana. “Climate Justice, Recognition, Pluralism”. Brazilian Political Science Review 19 (2025): 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821202500010003.
Posner, Richard. Catastrophe: Risk and Response. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Povitkina, Maria. “The Limits of Democracy in Tackling Climate Change.” Environmental Politics 27 (2018): 411-32. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09644016.2018.1444723.
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice: A Restatement. Edited by Erin Kelly. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.
Reiff, Mark. “Hope in an Illiberal Age?” Ethics, Policy and Environment 27 (2024): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2024.2306115.
Robeyns, Ingrid. “Why Limitarianism?” The Journal of Political Philosophy 30 (2022): 249-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12275.
Roser, Dominic, and Christian Seidel. Climate Justice: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 2017.
Scheffler, Samuel. Why Worry About Future Generations? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Shue, Henry. “Subsistence and Luxury Emissions.” In Climate Ethics: Essential Readings, 200-15. Edited by Stephen Gardiner, Simon Caney, and Dale Jamieson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Shue, Henry. The Pivotal Generation: Why We Have a Moral Responsibility to Slow Climate Change Right Now. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2022
Tank, Lukas. “The Unfair Burdens Argument Against Carbon Pricing.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 37 (2020): 612-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12429.
Williges, Katharina, Lukas Meyer, Karl Steininger, and Gottfried Kirchengast. “Fairness Critically Conditions the Carbon Budget Allocation Across Countries.” Global Environmental Change 74 (2022): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102481.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2025 Diana Piroli, Nunzio Alì

TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.

