Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Models, Shapes and Geometries
Articles

Reframing Descriptive Geometry in the Digital Era

PDF - EN
  • José Antonio Barrera Vera,
  • Roberto Narváez-Rodríguez
José Antonio Barrera Vera
University of Seville
Roberto Narváez-Rodríguez
University of Seville
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/tribelon-3355

Published 2025-06-09

Keywords

  • Descriptive geometry,
  • architecture,
  • graphic expression,
  • geometric thinking,
  • digital tools

How to Cite

Barrera Vera, J. A., & Narváez-Rodríguez, R. (2025). Reframing Descriptive Geometry in the Digital Era. TRIBELON Journal of Drawing and Representation of Architecture, Landscape and Environment, 2(3), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.36253/tribelon-3355

Copyright (c) 2025 José Antonio Barrera Vera, Roberto Narváez-Rodríguez

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The relationship between descriptive geometry and architecture is undergoing a significant transformation, driven by both the increasing complexity of contemporary architectural demands and the evolution of digital tools. Each technological era – from traditional descriptive geometry through 2D CAD, 3D modelling, computational design, to emerging AI approaches – has fundamentally altered the way geometry is accessed, conceptualised, and manipulated. These transformations have led to the development of new cognitive frameworks for spatial thinking. This article examines this transformation through two complementary analyses. First, it investigates how different technological eras have redefined the medium through which architects engage with geometry, focusing on how these shifts in medium have transformed cognitive mechanisms from projection-based reasoning to algorithm-based thinking and, more recently, to natural language interaction. Second, the article identifies descriptive geometry's evolving roles in contemporary architectural practice, research, and education, revealing both invariant principles that persist regardless of technological mediums and new geometric competencies required by contemporary architectural challenges. The analysis demonstrates that descriptive geometry represents not a fixed operational methodology but
an evolving framework for spatial reasoning that transcends specific technological implementations. This contributes to the ongoing dialogue about geometric literacy in the computational age.

PDF - EN

References

  1. M. Abu-Haifa, S. J. Lee, Image-based 3D modeling-to-simulation of single-wythe masonry structure via reverse descriptive geometry, in Journal of Building Engineering, LXXVI, 2023.
  2. R. Aish, DesignScript: Scalable Tools for Design Computation, in Computation and Performance, II, 2013, pp. 87-95.
  3. R. Aish, First Build Your Tools, in B. Peters, T. Peters (eds.), Inside Smartgeometry: Expanding the Architectural Possibilities of Computational Design, Wiley, 2013, pp. 39-49.
  4. R. Aish, P. Noakes, Architecture without numbers – CAAD based on a 3D modelling system, in Computer-Aided Design, XVI, 1984, 6, pp. 321-328.
  5. Ö. Akin, Psychology of Architectural Design, Pion Limited, London 1986.
  6. Ö. Akin, B. Dave, S. Pithavadian, Problem structuring in architectural design, in Engineering Problem Solving, 1987.
  7. J. A. Barrera-Vera, Elicon (1.0), Dept. of Graphic Engineering, University of Seville, Seville 1995.
  8. S. K. Bhavnani et al., CAD usage in an architectural office: From observations to active assistance, in Automation in Construction, V, 1996, 3, pp. 243-255.
  9. P. Carl, Urban Density and Block Metabolism, in K. Steemers, S. Yannas (eds.), Architecture, City, Environment: Proceedings of PLEA 2000, James & James, London 2000, p. 852.
  10. M. Carpo, The Digital Turn in Architecture 1992-2012, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester 2013.
  11. M. Carpo, The Second Digital Turn: Design beyond Intelligence, MIT Press, Cambridge 2018.
  12. S. Choi, Generative architectural plan drawings for early design decisions: data grounding and additional training for specific use cases, in AEDM, Taylor & Francis, 2024.
  13. C. M. Eastman, Architectural CAD: a ten year assessment of the state of the art, in Computer-Aided Design, XXI, 1989, 5, pp. 289-292.
  14. C. M. Eastman, Building Product Models: Computer Environments, Supporting Design and Construction, CRC Press, Boca Raton 1999.
  15. R. Evans, The Projective Cast: Architecture and Its Three Geometries, MIT Press, Cambridge 1995.
  16. F. Gonzalez Quintial, A. Martin Pastor, Monge Surfaces. Generation, Discretisation and Application in Architecture, in Nexus XXVI, 2024, pp. 811-828.
  17. D. S. Hensel, J. Tyc, M. Hensel, Data-driven design for Architecture and Environment Integration: Convergence of data-integrated workflows for understanding and designing environments, in Spool, IX, 2022, 1.
  18. T. E. Johnson, Sketchpad III. Three-Dimensional Graphical Communication with a Digital Computer, MIT Press, Cambridge 1963.
  19. B. W. Kernighan, C. J. Van Wyk, Extracting geometric information from architectural drawings, in M. C. Lin, D. Manocha (eds.), Applied Computational Geometry Towards Geometric Engineering, Springer, Berlin 1996.
  20. B. Kolarevic, Architecture in the Digital Age: Design and Manufacturing, Spon Press - Taylor & Francis, London 2003.
  21. C. Li et al., Generative AI for Architectural Design: A Literature Review, ArXiv, 2024, pp. 1-32.
  22. J. Á. Martínez Moya, A. Soler Estrela, Metodología de recuperación gráfica de las portadas del Palacio Condal de Oliva, in EGE, VIII, 2014.
  23. A. Martín-Pastor, R. Narvaez-Rodriguez, New Properties About the Intersection of Rotational Quadratic Surfaces and Their Applications in Architecture, in Nexus, XXI, 2019, 1.
  24. A. Menges, S. Ahlquist, Computational Design Thinking: Computation Design Thinking, Wiley, Chichester 2011.
  25. R. Migliari, Descriptive Geometry: From its Past to its Future, in Nexus Network Journal, XIV, 2012, 3, pp. 555-571.
  26. N. M. Matter, N. Gado, Artificial Intelligence in Architecture: Integration into Architectural Design Process, in Engineering Research Journal, CLXXXI, 2024, 2.
  27. G. Monge, Géométrie Descriptive - Leçons données aux Écoles normales, l’An 3 de la République, Impr. de Baudouin, Paris 1798.
  28. R. Narvaez-Rodriguez, J. A. Barrera-Vera, Lightweight Conical Components for Rotational Parabolic Domes: Geometric Definition, Structural Behaviour, Optimisation and Digital Fabrication, in S. Adriaenssens, et al. (eds.), Advances in Architectural Geometry,
  29. Zürich 2016, pp. 378-397.
  30. R. Narvaez-Rodriguez, A. Martin-Pastor, M. Aguilar-Alejandre, The Caterpillar Gallery: Quadratic Surface Theorems, Parametric Design and Digital Fabrication, in P. Block, et al. (eds.), Advances in Architectural Geometry, 2015, pp. 309-322.
  31. R. Oxman, The thinking eye: visual re-cognition in design emergence, in Design Studies, XXIII, 2002, 2, pp. 135-164.
  32. R. Oxman, Theory and design in the first digital age, in Design Studies, XXVII, 2006, 3, pp. 229-265.
  33. R. Oxman, Digital architecture as a challenge for design pedagogy: theory, knowledge, models and medium, in Design Studies, XXIX, 2008, 2, pp. 99-120.
  34. R. Oxman, Thinking difference: Theories and models of parametric design thinking, in Design Studies, LII, 2017.
  35. A. Pérez-Gómez, Questions of representation: the poetic origin of architecture, in Architectural Research Quarterly, IX, 2005, pp. 217-225.
  36. B. Peters, Computation works: The building of algorithmic thought, in Architectural Design, LXXXIII, 2013, 2, pp. 8-14.
  37. H. Pottmann et al., Architectural geometry, in Computers and Graphics, XLVII, 2015, pp. 145-164.
  38. D. Shuyao et al., Towards Human-AI Collaborative Architectural Concept Design via Semantic AI, in M. Turrin, C. Andriotis, A. Rafiee (eds.), Computer-Aided Architectural Design. INTERCONNECTIONS: Co-computing Beyond Boundaries, Springer Nature, Cham 2023, pp. 68-82.
  39. B. Schiavi, V. Havard, K. Beddiar, D. Baudry, BIM data flow architecture with AR/VR technologies: Use cases in architecture, engineering and construction, in Automation in Construction, CXXXIV, 2022.
  40. P. Schreiber, Generalized Descriptive Geometry, in Journal for Geometry and Graphics, VI, 2002, 1.
  41. W. Shoujue, L. Jiangliang, Geometrical learning, descriptive geometry, and biomimetic pattern recognition, in Neurocomputing, LXVII, 2005, 1-4 (Supplement), pp. 9–28.
  42. R. Taton, L’œuvre scientifique de Monge, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris 1951.
  43. K. Terzidis, Algorithmic Architecture, Architectural Press - Elsevier, Oxford 2006.
  44. S. Weber, H. Klein, B. Kordyaka, D. Siemon, B. Niehaves, Designing successful Human-AI Collaboration for Creative-Problem Solving in Architectural Design, in ICIS, 2024.
  45. R. Woodbury, Strategies for Interactive Design Systems, Carnegie Mellon University Research Showcase, Pittsburgh 1986, 26.
  46. R. Woodbury, Elements of Parametric Design, Routledge - Taylor & Francis Group, London-New York 2010.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.