Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): To Shape: Order and Measure
Articles

Beyond the Module: Measuring Adaptation in the Laurentian Palimpsest

Matteo Bigongiari
University of Florence

Published 2025-12-23

Keywords

  • Architectural Survey,
  • Cultural Heritage,
  • Palimpsest,
  • Architectural Order,
  • Critical Interpretation

How to Cite

Bigongiari, M. (2025). Beyond the Module: Measuring Adaptation in the Laurentian Palimpsest. TRIBELON Journal of Drawing and Representation of Architecture, Landscape and Environment, 2(4), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.36253/tribelon-3720

Abstract

This paper dialogues with the traditional historiographical reading of the Laurentian Complex, seeking to complement the established studies on the abstract modular Order by focusing on its material implementation. The essay advances the thesis that the Laurentian site – defined by pre-existing structures and a complex "piecemeal" evolution – is a "palimpsest" whose current form is the result of a continuous process of material adaptation.
The Renaissance "module" is framed not as a rigid grid, but as an ideal norm (regula) constantly mediated by constructional practice (facture) and the inevitable in situ adaptations. This essay presents a "knowledge project" based on an integrated digital survey (TLS, GNSS, UAV). This apparatus is not aimed at a purely abstract verification of the module, but rather at scientifically measuring the discrepancy between the ideal norm and the reality of the construction site. The unified metric infrastructure allows, for the first time, for the mapping of three-dimensional discontinuities. This approach quantifies the structural and altimetric differences between the foundations, the transept of the first phase, and the subsequently built nave, as well as the physical constraints of pre-existing elements. This process transforms the Survey from a documentary act into a hermeneutic investigation. The Drawing (Representation) thus becomes the critical synthesis that "puts in order" the palimpsest, making legible the complex stratification of adaptation, which constitutes the material realisation of the Order on the site.

References

  1. F. I. Apollonio, Classification Schemes for Visualization of Uncertainty in Digital Hypothetical Reconstruction, in S. Münster, M. Pfarr-Harfst, P. Kuroczyński, M. Ioannides (eds.), 3D Research Challenges in Cultural Heritage II. How to Manage Data and Knowledge Related to Interpretative Digital 3D Reconstructions of Cultural Heritage, Springer, Heidelberg 2016, pp. 173–197.
  2. G. Aroni, Vitruvian Proportions in the Design of the Architectural Orders of the Basilica of San Lorenzo, in Annali di Architettura, 2019, 31, pp. 7–21.
  3. A. Augenti, Uno sguardo archeologico sulle architetture del Trecento: temi, problemi e prospettive, in A. Tosco, F. Beltramo (a cura di), Architettura medievale: il Trecento. Modelli, tecniche, materiali, All’Insegna del Giglio, Sesto Fiorentino 2022.
  4. G. Belli, F. Lucchesi, P. Raggi, Firenze nella prima metà dell’Ottocento. La città nei documenti del Catasto Generale Toscano, Firenze University Press, Firenze 2022.
  5. S. Bertocci, M. Bigongiari, Behind the Dome: The Hidden Roofs of Brunelleschi's Old Sacristy. A Digital Survey Approach to Medieval Construction in the Renaissance, in A. Passuello, O. Michalis (eds.), Behind the Scenes of Medieval Roofs. An Overview of the Roofing Systems of Italian Churches, «L’Erma» di Bretschneider, Roma 2025.
  6. S. Bertocci, M. Bigongiari, A. Pasquali, Digitisation of the wooden maquette at Casa Buonarroti: a project never realized for the facade of San Lorenzo in Firenze, in Atti della conferenza KUI 2024, Firenze 2024.
  7. S. Bertocci, Beni archeologici e tecnologie digitali per la conservazione: tre progetti per il Patrimonio Mondiale UNESCO, in P. Chías, V. Cardone, Dibujo y arquitectura, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares 2016, pp. 16–31.
  8. A. Bruschi, Filippo Brunelleschi, Bompiani, Milano 2006.
  9. M. Docci, Teoria e pratica del disegno, Laterza, Roma–Bari 1991.
  10. F. Doglioni, Stratigrafia e restauro. Tra conoscenza e conservazione, Edizioni GBC, Susegana 2008.
  11. C. Dore, M. Murphy, Integration of Historic Building Information Modeling (HBIM) and 3D GIS for recording and managing cultural heritage sites, in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia, Milano 2–5 settembre 2012, pp. 369–376.
  12. F. Remondino, Heritage Recording and 3D Modeling with Photogrammetry and 3D Scanning, in Remote Sensing, III, 2011, 6, pp. 1104–1138.
  13. X. Li, L. Teppati Losè, F. Rinaudo, Documentation for Architectural Heritage: A Historical Building Information Modeling Data Modeling Approach for the Valentino Castle North Wing, in ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 14, 2025, p. 139.
  14. M. Balzani, F. Maietti, Architectural Space in a Protocol for an Integrated 3D Survey aimed at the Documentation, Representation and Conservation of Cultural Heritage, in diségno, 2017, 1, pp. 113–122.
  15. M. Trachtenberg, Building and Writing S. Lorenzo in Florence: Architect, Biographer, Patron, and Prior, in The Art Bulletin, XCVII, 2015, 2, pp. 140–172.
  16. R. Migliari, Il disegno degli ordini e il rilievo dell’architettura classica: cinque pezzi facili, in Disegnare Idee Immagini, 1991, 2, pp. 49–66.
  17. M. Murphy, E. McGovern, S. Pavía, Historic Building Information Modelling – Adding intelligence to laser and image based surveys of European classical architecture, in ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2011, 76, pp. 89–102.
  18. R. Pacciani, Testimonianze per l’edificazione della basilica di San Lorenzo a Firenze (1421–1442), in Prospettiva, 1994, 75–76, pp. 85–99.
  19. R. Parenti, Dalla stratigrafia all’archeologia dell’architettura. Alcune recenti esperienze del laboratorio senese, in Arqueología de la Arquitectura, 2002, 1, pp. 73–82.
  20. L. Quaroni, Progettare un edificio. Otto lezioni di architettura, Gangemi, Roma 1977.
  21. H. Saalman, Filippo Brunelleschi: The Buildings, The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park 1993.
  22. S. Parrinello, F. Picchio, M. Ricciarini, S. La Placa, Catedral de Prato. Documentación y representación de los bajorrelieves y decoraciones del púlpito de Donatello, in Mimesis.Jsad, 4, 2024, pp. 99–105.
  23. S. Parrinello, F. Picchio, S. Barba, Drones and Drawings – Methods of Data Acquisition, Management, and Representation, in DisegnareCon, 2022, 15, pp. 0–6.
  24. S. Garagnani, A. Gaucci, P. Moscati, M. Gaiani, ArchaeoBIM. Theory, Processes and Digital Methodologies for the Lost Heritage, Bononia University Press, Bologna 2021.
  25. G. M. Valenti, A. Martinelli, Sulla qualità geometrica del modello di rilievo / On the geometric quality of the survey model, in C. Battini, E. Bistagnino (a cura di), Dialoghi. Visioni e visualità, FrancoAngeli, Milano 2022, pp. 2937–2952.
  26. X. Yang, P. Grussenmeyer, M. Koehl, H. Macher, A. Murtiyoso, T. Landes, Review of built heritage modelling: Integration of HBIM and other information techniques, in Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2020, 46, pp. 350–360.