No. SI1 (2025): Special Issue
Essays

On the Edge of the Abyss: A Step Back Toward Prosperity Fashion

Nuno Nogueira
Faculdade de Arquitetura da Universidade de Lisboa
Ines Simoes
Faculdade de Arquitetura da Universidade de Lisboa

Published 14-07-2025

Keywords

  • phenomenological body,
  • representation of the body,
  • art and design processes,
  • pattern design,
  • autoethnography

How to Cite

Nogueira, N., & Simoes, I. (2025). On the Edge of the Abyss: A Step Back Toward Prosperity Fashion. Fashion Highlight, (SI1), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.36253/fh-3105

Abstract

To approach prosperity fashion holistically, conventional constructs about fashion design processes and the interpersonal relations they lead to should be questioned and reoriented. To set this viewpoint in context, this article begins by reviewing the current state of fashion and its implications for production and consumption (both of which have expanded significantly), triggering a fluidity of identity focused on image and performance. Next, the article assumes an ontological perspective of fashion as art and/or design, examining to what degree each category emphasizes the esthetic, functional and use aspects; each paragraph is followed by our perceptions and appreciation for specific designs and designers, writing in the first-person plural and intentionally indenting these inserts. The third section highlights the significance of processes that emphasize the representation of the phenomenological body; by drawing on our sensory, bodily knowledge, backgrounds, and research practices, we utilize an autoethnographic format to describe our individual explorations in pattern design, both grounded on intuition as a creative force. To conclude, the extracted meaning from the two self-narratives conveys the concept of prosperity fashion as a meaningful and multidimensional (i.e., non-consumerist) understanding of the relationship between body[maker]—process—body[user].

References

  1. Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Malden, MA: Polity Press and Blackwell Publishing.
  2. Bohm, D. (1996/2006). On Creativity. Lee Nichol (ed.). London and New York: Routledge Classics.
  3. Brown, S. (2022, February 24). Hustle and hype: the truth about the influencer economy. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2022/feb/24/hustle-and-hype-the-truth-about-the-influencer-economy
  4. De Boeck, Christoph (2003). Material Sound. Patronen/Patterns, Mode Museum-Provincie Antwerpen. Amsterdam: Ludion, 103-105.
  5. Debord, G. (1970). Society of the Spectacle. Detroit: Black and Red.
  6. Dubberly, H. (2022, October 20). Why we should stop describing design as “problem solving.” Dubberly Design Office. Retrieved from https://www.dubberly.com/articles/why-we-should-stop-describing-design-as-problem-solving.html
  7. Entwistle, J. (2000). The Fashioned Body: Fashion, dress & modern social theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  8. Hollander, A. (1975/1993). Seeing Through Clothes. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  9. Hollander, A. (1994). Sex and Suits: The Evolution of Modern Dress. Claridge Press.
  10. Hubbard, S. (2024, March 18). Barbara Kruger I Shop Therefore I Am (1987-2019). Artlyst Significant Works. Retrieved from https://artlyst.com/features/barbara-kruger-i-shop-therefore-i-am-1987-2019-significant-works-sue-hubbard/
  11. James, P.D. (2002). A Mind to Murder. London: Faber & Faber. (Original work published 1963)
  12. Joy, A., Sherry, J., Venkatesh, A., Wang, J. and Chan, R. (2012). Fast fashion, sustainability, and the ethical appeal of luxury brands. Fashion Theory, 16(13), 273-296.
  13. Kidwell, C. B. (1979). Cutting a Fashionable Fit: Dressmakers’ Drafting Systems in the United States. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
  14. Landes, D. (2017). Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1908–61). In The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor and Francis. Retrieved from https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/biographical/merleau-ponty-maurice-1908-61/v-2. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-DD045-2
  15. Michl, J. (1995) Form Follows WHAT? The Modernist Notion of Function as a Carte Blanche. Magazine of the Faculty of Architecture & Town Planning, No. 10. Haifa: Technion Israel Institute of Technology, 20-31. Retrieved from http://janmichl.com/eng.fff-hai.html.
  16. Paglia, C. (1990). Sexual Personae – Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickson. Connecticut: Yale University Press.
  17. Schouwenberg, L. and Kaethler, M. (eds.) (2021). The Auto-Ethnographic Turn in Design. Valiz: Amsterdam.
  18. Simon, Herbert (1996). The Science of the Artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA/London, England: MIT Press.
  19. Smelik, A. (2011). The Performance of Authenticity. Address. Journal for Fashion Writing and Criticism, 1(1), 76-82
  20. Schulz, (2024, June 12). Did micro-trends kill the trend cycle? Vogue Business. Retrieved from https://www.voguebusiness.com/story/fashion/did-micro-trends-kill-the-trend-cycle
  21. Sparke, P. (2009). The Genius of Design. London: Quadrille Publishing
  22. Zhou, M. (2022, July 29). What are micro-trends? How styles change faster than ever. Good on you. Retrieved from https://goodonyou.eco/micro-trends/