No. SI1 (2025): Special Issue
Essays

​​Co-creating sustainable fashion: a participatory approach for involving users in the design process

Maria Maciejko
Anhalt University of Applied Sciences
Alberto Iberbuden
Anhalt University of Applied Sciences
Alejandro Lecuna
Anhalt University of Applied Sciences

Published 14-07-2025

Keywords

  • fashion design,
  • co-design,
  • participatory methods,
  • sustainability,
  • design for behaviour change

How to Cite

Maciejko, M., Iberbuden, A., & Lecuna, A. (2025). ​​Co-creating sustainable fashion: a participatory approach for involving users in the design process. Fashion Highlight, (SI1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.36253/fh-3124

Abstract

The fashion industry is dominated by the mass-market sector, characterised by extremely short production times, low manufacturing costs and high volumes of garments driven by short-lived trends. In this process, the profits are prioritised over users’ needs, while the negative effects of overproduction are overlooked. 

Despite raising awareness of fashion production’s detrimental consequences, the design process often remains a mystery and there has been little research on including co-design approaches into it. Can involving users in the design process contribute to a behaviour change towards more sustainable fashion consumption?

This paper adopts a research-through-design approach to bridge the gap between co-design and fashion. Drawing from design for behaviour change, we strive to redefine the concept of prosperity from a profit- and trend-motivated to focusing on the needs of the users through inviting them to participate in the design process.

We propose a five-step framework for a collaboration between fashion professionals and users. The framework elements - brand research, understanding the user, defining function, building identity, and user test - facilitate an exchange of perspectives and encourage participants to become researchers of their relationship with clothing. The findings of this research invite designers and researchers to further explore this emerging field.

References

  1. Chon, H. (2014). Exploring research space in fashion: The fluidity of knowledge between designers, individuals and society. In P. Rodgers & J. Yee (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Design Research (pp. 72–86). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315758466-8
  2. Clune, S., Lockton, D. (2017) Design for behavioural change and sustainability. In K. Niedderer, S. Clune, & G. Ludden (Eds.), Design for behaviour change: Theories and practices of designing for change (pp. 166-183). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315576602
  3. Connor-Crabb, A., & Rigby, E. (2019). Garment quality and sustainability: A user-based approach. Fashion Practice, 11(3), 346–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2019.1662223
  4. Cramer, J. (2011). Made to keep: Product longevity through participatory design in fashion. Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal—Annual Review, 5(5), 437–446. https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1874/cgp/v05i05/38170
  5. Ericson, A., Wenngren, J., Holmqvist, J., & Hammarberg, K. (2016). The case of an innovation contest: Participatory design in a social context. Proceedings of the DESIGN 2016 / 14th International Design Conference. Retrieved from https://www.designsociety.org/publication/38907/THE+CASE+OF+AN+INNOVATION+CONTEST+%E2%80%93+PARTICIPATORY+DESIGN+IN+A+SOCIAL+CONTEXT
  6. Fletcher, K. (2016). Craft of use: Post-growth fashion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315647371
  7. Lee, J., Popovic, V., & Lee, K.-P. (2006). Design for experiencing and user involvement in the product-service development process. Wonderground - DRS International Conference 2006. Retrieved from https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers/drs2006/researchpapers/7
  8. Maier, A., & Cash, P. (2022). Designing for human behaviour in a systemic world. In A. Maier, J. Oehmen, & P. Vermaas (Eds.), Handbook of Engineering Systems Design (pp. 1–34). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46054-9_16-1
  9. Monestier, E., Efremenko, T., Fiore, M., & Canina, M. (2024). Beyond boundaries: Art-tech collaboration driving future-oriented innovation. In E. Markopoulos, R. S. Goonetilleke, & Y. Luximon (Eds.), Creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship: Vol. 125. (pp. 134–143). AHFE. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1004729
  10. Munasinghe, P. D., Dissanayake, D., & Druckman, A. (2022). An investigation of the mass-market fashion design process. Research Journal of Textile and Apparel, 26(4), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1108/RJTA-08-2020-0089
  11. Odabasi, S., von Busch, O., Moon, C., Sansone, L., Rissanen, T. (2023). Transition design and fashion, Fashion Practice, 15(2), 349-367, https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2022.2133183
  12. Redström, J. (2017). Making design theory. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11160.001.0001
  13. Sanders, E., & Stappers, P. J. (2012). Convivial toolbox: Generative research for the front end of design. BIS Publishers.
  14. Scariot, C., Heemann, A., & Padovani, S. (2012). Understanding the collaborative-participatory design. Work, 41, 2701–2705. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0656-2701
  15. Vignoli, M., Roversi, S., Jatwani, C., & Tiriduzzi, M. (2021). Human and planet-centered approach: Prosperity thinking in action. Proceedings of the Design Society, 1, 1797–1806. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.441