No. SI1 (2025): Special Issue
Essays

Caring for Fashion by Doing the Laundry: Generating alternative acts of consumption from the laundry basket

Helga Halldorsdottir
Swedish School of Textiles, University of Borås

Published 14-07-2025

Keywords

  • Laundry,
  • Care,
  • Consuming Acts,
  • Expressions of Bonding,
  • Body-Object Relationships

How to Cite

Halldorsdottir, H. (2025). Caring for Fashion by Doing the Laundry: Generating alternative acts of consumption from the laundry basket. Fashion Highlight, (SI1), 552–561. https://doi.org/10.36253/fh-3136

Abstract

Wearing has long been the primary act of fashion, yet fashion consumers additionally engage in a complex, interactive relationship with garments when they are not worn. This paper explores the nuanced relationship between care and fashion consumption by examining the acts of care involved in doing the laundry. In identifying laundry as a series of seemingly small quasi-events that intertwine identity, social norms, and cultural consumption, caring for fashion can be reframed by abstracting typical laundry acts, such as progressing folding into a caring act of holding. Common consumption patterns and behaviours can be altered by disrupting standard laundry practices and engaging consumers in care activities based on joy, fulfilment, or even frustration. Examining how we consume fashion objects in our homes through the laundry basket can provide further insight into body-object relationships from the perspectives of care, maintenance, and dependence. This can thereby redefine expressions of bonding and our engagement with material culture by suggesting the consumption of acts as opposed to things as a means to care for fashion.

References

  1. Ávila, M. (2022). Designing for Interdependence: A Poetics of Relating. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  2. Boradkar, P. (Ed.). (2014). Designing Things: A Critical Introduction to the Culture of Objects. London: Bloomsbury Academic
  3. Carse, J.P. (1986). Finite and Infinite Games: A Vision of Life as Play and Possibility. The Free Press.
  4. Chapman, J. (2012). Emotionally Durable Design: Objects, Experiences and Empathy (1st ed.). Taylor & Francis Group.
  5. Chapman, J. (2021). Meaningful Stuff: Design That Lasts. MIT Press.
  6. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Halton, E. (1981). The meaning of things: domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge University Press.
  7. Cooper, T. (2005). Slower consumption reflections on product life spans and the “throwaway society”. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(1‐2), pp.51-67.
  8. Dant, T. (1996). Fetishism and the Social Value of Objects. The Sociological Review, 44(3), 495–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1996.tb00434.x
  9. DiSalvo, C. (2022). Design as democratic inquiry: Putting experimental civics into practice. MIT Press.
  10. Gibson, J.J. (1977). The theory of affordances. Hilldale, USA, 1(2), pp.67-82.
  11. Goffman, E. (2013). Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Reprint of 1961 Ed. Martino Fine Books.
  12. Harper, K. (2018). Aesthetic Sustainability: Product Design and Sustainable Usage (R.R. Simonsen, Trans.; 1st ed.). Routledge.
  13. Janlert, L.E. & Stolterman, E.(2017). Things that keep us busy: The elements of interaction. MIT Press.
  14. Kuusk, K. (2016). Crafting sustainable smart textile services. [Phd Thesis 1 (Research TU/e / Graduation TU/e), Industrial Design]. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
  15. Laitala, K., Klepp, I. G., & Boks, C. (2012). Changing laundry habits in Norway. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36(2), 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01081.x
  16. Marchand, A. & Walker, S. (2008). Product development and responsible consumption: designing alternatives for sustainable lifestyles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(11), pp.1163-1169.
  17. Mendelson, C. (2009). Laundry: The home comforts book of caring for clothes and linens. Simon and Schuster.
  18. Mylan, J., & Southerton, D. (2018). The Social Ordering of an Everyday Practice: The Case of Laundry. Sociology, 52(6), 1134-1151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517722932
  19. Norman, D. (2004) (a). Affordances and design. Unpublished article, available online at: http://www. jnd. org/dn. mss/affordances-and-design. html, p.14.
  20. Norman, D. (2004) (b). Emotional Design: Why We Love or Hate Everyday Things. Basic Books.
  21. Norman, D., 2013. The Design of Everyday Things. MIT Press.
  22. Pink, S., Mackley K.L., Morosanu, R. (2015). Hanging out at home: laundry as a thread and texture of everyday life. International Journal of Cultural Studies 18(2): 209–224. DOI:10.1177/1367877913508461.
  23. Pink, S. (2012). Situating Everyday Life: Practices and Places. London: Sage.
  24. Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
  25. Ross, P. R., & Wensveen, S. A. G. (2010). Designing Behavior in Interaction: Using Aesthetic Experience as a Mechanism for Design. International Journal of Design, 4(2), 3-13.
  26. Saito, Y. (2022). Aesthetics of Care: Practice in Everyday Life. United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Academic.
  27. Saito, Y. (2017). Aesthetics of the Familiar: Everyday Life and World Making. United Kingdom. Oxford University Press.
  28. Schiermer, B. (2011). Quasi-objects, Cult Objects and Fashion Objects: On Two Kinds of Fetishism on Display in Modern Culture. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276410374632
  29. Shove, E. (2004). Sustainability, system innovation and the laundry. System innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence and policy, pp.76-94.
  30. Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change. Environment and Planning A. 2010, volume 42, pages 1273 ^ 1285
  31. Thornquist, C. (2018) (a) The Fashion Condition: Rethinking Fashion from Its Everyday Practices, Fashion Practice, 10:3, 289-310, DOI:10.1080/17569370.2018.1507147
  32. Thornquist, C. (2018) (b) The potential of dance: Reducing fashion consumption through movement therapy, Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 183, Pages 824-830, ISSN 0959-6526, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.238.
  33. Verbeek, P. (2005). What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. Pennsylvania State, University Press.
  34. Wakkary, R. (2021). Things we Could Design: For More than Human-Centered Worlds. The MIT Press.
  35. Yates, L., & Evans, D. (2016). Dirtying Linen: Re‐evaluating the sustainability of domestic laundry. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26(2), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1704