No. SI1 (2025): Special Issue
Essays

Prospering Dress: Exploring textile_knowledges and situated_fashions

Dagmar Venohr
Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg

Published 14-07-2025

Keywords

  • autoethnography,
  • situated knowledges,
  • more-than-human worlds,
  • textile literacy,
  • education for sustainable development (ESD)

How to Cite

Venohr, D. (2025). Prospering Dress: Exploring textile_knowledges and situated_fashions. Fashion Highlight, (SI1), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.36253/fh-3220

Abstract

Dress cultures are more extensive than Fashion (Niessen, 2022), and their diverse dimensions are conceptualized here as situated_fashions and textile_knowledges. Drawing on Haraway’s concept of situated knowledges (Haraway, 1988), such dress enables rich belongings with more-than-human worlds, grows interdependent prosperity and sustains intra-active relationships (Barad, 2007). The paper presents and discusses the results of the seminar NatureCultureFashionStudies – Autoethnographic Field Research, which took place in spring 2024 at the Institute of Material Culture, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg. The aim was to find a certain language for the relations between nature, culture and fashion that expresses the vibrant materiality (Bennett, 2004) of these fields. During the research-based learning other functions of textiles became important, and with them the material, the cut, the processing. On this mental, sensually perceptible and fertile soil, textile literacy grows, and other fashions prosper.

References

  1. Au, J. von & Jucker, R. (2022). Draußenlernen: Neue Forschungsergebnisse und Praxiseiblicke für eine Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung. Bern: hep.
  2. Barad, K. (2003). Agential Realism: How material-discursive practices matter. Signs, 28(3), 803-831.
  3. Barnard, M. (2020). Fashion as Communication revisted. Popular Communication, 18(3), https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2020.1844888.
  4. Barnard, M. 1996). Fashion as Communication. London/New York: Routledge.
  5. Becker, C. (2005). Bildungsziel: Kompetente Alltagsakteure. textil…Wissenschaft-Forschung-Bildung, 76(2), 7-16.
  6. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke University Press.
  7. Bennett, J. (2004). The Force of Things: Steps toward an Ecology of Matter. Political Theory, 32(3), 347-372, https://www.jstor.org/stable/4148158.
  8. Cooke, Jr., E. S. (2022). Global Objects: Toward a Connected History. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  9. Certeau, M. de (1984): Spatial Stories. In The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press, 115-130.
  10. Ellis, C. & Bochner, A. (2003). Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Ed.) Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials (pp. 199-258). Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: Sage.
  11. ESD (2025). Education for Sustainable Development. https://www.unesco.org/en/sustainable-development/education. (BNE (2025). Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung. https://www.bne-portal.de/bne/de/weltweit/bne-2030/bne-2030_node.html.)
  12. Fletcher, K. & Tham, M. (2019). Earth Logic Fashion Action Research Plan. London: Charitable Trust.
  13. Fletcher, K. & Klepp, I. (2017). Opening up the Wardrobe: A Method Book. Oslo: Novus.
  14. Gardner & Mohajer va Peseran (2023). Radical Fashion Exercises: A Workbook of Modes and Methods. Amsterdam: Valiz.
  15. Geertz, C. (1973). Thick Description Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture. In The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books, 3-30.
  16. Gesing, F., Knecht, M., Filtner, M. & Amelang, K.et al. (Ed.) (2019). NaturenKulturen: Denkräume und Werkzeuge für neue politische Ökologien. Bielefeld: transcript.
  17. Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599.
  18. Haraway, D. (1985). A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review, 80, 65-107.
  19. Holroyd, A. T., Farley Gordon, J. & Hill, C. (2023). Historical Perspectives on Sustainable Fashion: Inspiration for Change. London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
  20. Holroyd, A. T. (2020). Fashion Fictions. https://fashionfictions.org.
  21. Huppertz, M & Schatanek, V. (2021). Achtsamkeit in der Natur: 101 naturbezogene Achtsamkeitsübungen und theoretische Grundlagen. Paderborn: Junfermann.
  22. Lehmann, A.-S. (2013). How materials make meaning. Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art: Meaning in Materials, 1400-1800, 62 (2012), 6-27.
  23. Lüthans, J.-S. (2024). Welche Bedeutung haben Kleidung und Mode für mein individuelles Wohlbefinden in der Natur? Unpublished term paper.
  24. Mida, I. E. & Kim, A. (2015). A Practical Guide to Object-Based Research in Fashion. London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
  25. Mitterfellner, O. (2020). Fashion Marketing and Communikation: Theory and Practice Across the Fashion Industry. London/New York: Routledge.
  26. Morizot, B. (2020). Philosophie der Wildnis oder die Kunst, vom Weg abzukommen. Ditzingen: Reclam.
  27. Mufleh, H. (2024). Natur und Kleidung: Aspekte zu einer gesunden, wertschätzenden und tragfähigen Beziehung zur Umwelt. Unpublished term paper.
  28. Niessen, S. (2022). Defining defashion: A manifesto for degrowth. International Journal of Fashion Studies, 9(2), 439-444. https://doi.org/10.1386/infs_00082_7.
  29. Reents, O. (2024). Eine autoethnografische Feldforschung zu einem Kulturort in der Natur. Unpublished term paper.
  30. Scheidegger, B. (2018). Umweltbildung: Planungsgrundlagen und didaktische Handlungsfelder. Bern: hep.
  31. Venohr, D. (2020). Collective-Aesthetical Experiences of Vestimentary Self-Fabrication. ZoneModa Journal, 10(1S), 265-281.
  32. Woodward, S. (2020). Material Methods: Researching and Thinking with Things. Los Angeles: Sage.