No. SI2 (2026): Special Issue RHITA Reshaping Italian Fashion
Essays

Creativity and Responsibility in the Italian Fashion System: Insights from the Leather Goods and Tanning Supply Chain

Edoardo Brunello
Università IUAV di Venezia

Published 09-03-2026

Keywords

  • fashion,
  • leather goods,
  • tannery,
  • university,
  • Made in Italy

How to Cite

Brunello, E. (2026). Creativity and Responsibility in the Italian Fashion System: Insights from the Leather Goods and Tanning Supply Chain . Fashion Highlight, (SI2). https://doi.org/10.36253/fh-3934

Abstract

The international competitiveness of the Italian fashion system today no longer depends on cost containment, but on its ability to integrate production specialization, sustainable innovation, and shared cultural values. The analysis of the leather goods supply chain, a strategic sector for Made in Italy and fundamental to the economies of the regions involved in the RHITA project. The persistence of tannery districts in Veneto, Tuscany, and Campania remains distinctive: cooperation among firms, concentrated expertise, and artisanal knowledge support advanced and traceable industrial processes. Within these local systems, new global pressures are increasingly intertwined. The entry of international groups, growing demands for transparency on environmental impacts, and the need to optimize resources are leading companies towards more circular models. In this context, stylistic choices influence the measurability of impacts and the durability of products. This transformation concerns not only production but also the forms that creativity takes. Innovation no longer resides exclusively in the designer’s act but emerges from the daily interaction among diverse roles within the supply chain. Rethinking the Italian fashion system therefore means recognizing the relational value of this network of competencies. It is precisely from this industrial scenario that the educational context can draw decisive insights. The university becomes a place where tensions can be recomposed, sectoral contradictions interpreted, and an ethical awareness of design cultivated. Bringing students and companies closer together thus creates the conditions to imagine a future in which creativity and sustainability converge in the process of reshaping the Italian fashion system.

References

  1. Barile, N. (2007). Made in Italy: da country of origin a metabrand. In P. Colaiacomo (Eds.), Fatto in Italia: la cultura del made in Italy (1960-2000), Meltemi.
  2. Becattini, G. (1998). Distretti industriali e Made in Italy: Le basi socioculturali del nostro sviluppo economico. Bollati Boringhieri.
  3. Becattini, G., & Bellandi, M. (2002). Distretti industriali: Un paradigma socio-economico. In M. Fortis & A. Quadrio Curzio (Eds.), Industria e distretti: Un paradigma di perdurante competitività italiana (pp. 82–83). Bruno Mondadori.
  4. Bettiol, M. (2015). Raccontare il Made in Italy: Un nuovo legame tra cultura e manifattura. Marsilio.
  5. Brunello, E., & Fava, E. (2024). Indossare lo spazio: Mila Schon e Angelo Mangiarotti. MDJournal, 18, Design, interni e oggetti contemporanei. (pp. 174-185)
  6. Brunello, E. (2022). Pelletteria e Made in Italy: Analisi di un settore tra aspetti progettuali, strategie comunicative e traiettorie di cambiamento (Doctoral dissertation, XXXIV cycle). Università Iuav di Venezia.
  7. Chitrakorn, K. (2018, February 2). The handbag battlefield: Louis Vuitton, Gucci and Prada. Business of Fashion. https://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/luxury/the-handbag- battlefield/
  8. Colaiacomo, P. (Eds). (2007). Fatto in Italia. La cultura del Made in Italy (1960-2000). Meltemi.
  9. Fava, E. & Brunello, E. (2020). Made in fabbrica. Il valore dell’industria nel racconto del Made in Italy. In M. A. Barucco, F. Bulegato, & A. Vaccari (Eds.), Remanufacturing Italy. L’Italia nell’epoca della postproduzione (pp. 202–221). Mimesis.
  10. Fortunati, L., & Danese, E. (2005). Manuale di comunicazione, sociologia e culture della moda (Vol. 3, Il Made in Italy). Maltemi.
  11. Frisa, M. L., Monti, G., & Tonchi, S. (Eds.). (2018). Italiana. L’Italia vista dalla moda, 1971–2001. Marsilio.
  12. Frisa, M. L., Tonchi, S., & Mattirolo, A. (Eds.). (2014). Bellissima: L’Italia dell’alta moda, 1945–1968. Electa.
  13. Garofoli, G. (1991). Modelli locali di sviluppo. FrancoAngeli.
  14. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Macmillan.
  15. Quadrio Curzio, A., & Fortis, M. (Eds.). (2002). Complessità e distretti industriali: Dinamiche, modelli, casi reali. Il Mulino.
  16. Sbordone, M. A. (2020), Discronie: La moda oltre i fenomeni del contemporaneo. LIST Lab.
  17. Shulman, A. (2017, October 31). The psychology of the designer handbag. Business of Fashion. https://www. businessoffashion.com/opinions/retail/the-psychology-of-the- designer-handbag/
  18. Sennet, R. (2021). L’uomo artigiano (trad. A. Bottini). Feltrinelli. (Original work published 2008)
  19. Volonté, P. (2003). La creatività diffusa: Culture e mestieri della moda oggi. FrancoAngeli.