No. SI1 (2025): Special Issue
Essays

Algorithmic Culture and Sartorial Prosperity: From Labour to Community Building

Pdf
  • Anna Keszeg,
  • Terike from Budapest
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/fh-3132

Published 14-07-2025

Keywords

  • algorithm,
  • algorism,
  • community building,
  • tailoring,
  • Central and Eastern Europe

How to Cite

Keszeg, A., & from Budapest, T. (2025). Algorithmic Culture and Sartorial Prosperity: From Labour to Community Building. Fashion Highlight, (SI1), 238–243. https://doi.org/10.36253/fh-3132

Copyright (c) 2025 Anna Keszeg, Terike from Budapest

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The article defines the term "prosperity fashion" by focusing on the nature of work in contemporary fashion. Our aim here is to redefine the concept of labour by balancing solitary work against collective imagination, creative invention against algorithmic creativity informed by sartorial knowledge, and solitary genius against empathy towards local communities. The paper deals with three main assumptions. First, it posits that in contemporary fashion design there is a newfound interest in tailoring and sartorial literacy. Secondly, it argues that this interest in tailoring is a consequence of contemporary algorithmic culture. Tailoring can be seen as an agency that unites craftsmanship, algorithmic culture, and a spiritual approach to clothing. Thirdly, in the final part of the argument we deal with the case study of a contemporary designer community (Terike from Budapest) connected through sartorial literacy, highlighting how this community embodies the principles of the sartorial turn. The article concludes by advocating for the decolonization of tailoring as a civilizing process (Wild 2014), using the Terike community as an example of local sartorial creativity and of "defashion" (Niessen 2022). This examination underscores the need to recognize and preserve diverse sartorial practices that challenge dominant narratives within the fashion industry.

Pdf

References

  1. Adamson, G. (Ed.). (2011). The craft reader. Oxford: Berg.
  2. Auther, E. (2010). String, felt, thread: The hierarchy of art and craft in American art. University of Minnesota Press.
  3. Bourdieu, P., & Delsaut, Y. (1975). Le couturier et sa griffe: Contribution à une théorie de la magie. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 1(1), 7–36.
  4. Chapsal, M. (1989). La chair de la robe. Fayard.
  5. Eizenberg, E., & Jabareen, Y. (2017). Social sustainability: A new conceptual framework. Sustainability, 9(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010068
  6. Hesmondhalgh, D. (2013). The cultural industries (3rd ed.). Sage.
  7. Kershen, A. J. (1995). Uniting the tailors: Trade unionism amongst the tailoring workers of London and Leeds, 1870–1939. Ilford, Essex, England: Portland.
  8. Liberty, J. E. (1933). Practical tailoring. Isaac Pitman and Sons.
  9. Mackay, R. (2007). Editorial introduction. In Collapse II (pp. 3–13). Urbanomic.
  10. Matthews Davis, A. (2005). Tailoring. In V. Steele (Ed.), Encyclopedia of food and culture (Vol. 1, pp. 261–264). Thomson Gale.
  11. McRobbie, A. (2002). Fashion culture: Creative work, female individualization. Feminist Review, 71(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400034
  12. Praznik, K. (2021). Art work: Invisible labour and the legacy of Yugoslav socialism. University of Toronto Press.
  13. Niessen, S. (2022). Defining defashion: A manifesto for degrowth. International Journal of Fashion Studies, 9(Decolonizing Fashion as Process), 439–444.
  14. Smelik, A. (2018). New materialism: A theoretical framework for fashion in the age of technological innovation. International Journal of Fashion Studies, 5(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1386/infs.5.1.33_1
  15. Striphas, T. (2015). Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4–5), 395–412.
  16. Wild, B. (2014). The Civilizing Process and Sartorial Studies. Clothing Cultures, 1(3), 213–24.