Published 14-07-2025
Keywords
- Theory of Fashion,
- Theology,
- Aesthetics of brands,
- Sociology of Religion
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2025 Alberto Fabio Ambrosio

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
The notion of prosperity has its own religious genealogy: in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Max Weber famously linked the notion of prosperity with the Protestant Reformation. As crucial as Weber’s theory is for different approaches to luxury, this paper focuses, instead, on a different understanding of prosperity in fashion, thus paving the way for a new religious genealogy of the notion. This genealogy imagines an approach to fashion that sees prosperity as happiness. Indeed, from a religious and ethical perspective, prosperity is, first and foremost, the search for happiness in this life. Several monotheistic traditions overlap the notion of prosperity with that of divine grace or blessing, meaning that true prosperity can only be achieved through the exercise of virtues. Thus, only virtues can create a new meaning and new aesthetics of prosperity in fashion. By offering a more theoretical reflection on the notion of prosperity in fashion, this paper intends to determine whether different forms of aesthetics might offer a clue for the understanding of prosperity and wealth in order to herald true prosperity in fashion.
References
- Agamben, G. (2018). Che cos’è un dispositivo? Milano: Nottetempo.
- Ambrosio, A. F. (2024). Per una morale contemporanea. Critica della moda pura. Milano: Mimesis.
- Ambrosio, A. F. (2022). Moda e religioni. Vestire il sacro, sacralizzare il look. Milano: Bruno Mondadori.
- Barile, N. (2011), Sistema moda. Oggetti, strategie e simboli: dall’iperlusso alla società low cost. Milano: Egea.
- Barthes, R. (1983). Fashion System. English transl. by M. Ward and R. Howard. New York: Hill and Wang.
- Dash, M. (2010). Tulipomania: The Story of the World’s Most Coveted Flower & the Extraordinary Passions It Aroused. New York: Crown/Archetype.
- Latouche, S. (2010). Le pari de la décroissance: Penser et consommer autrement pour une révolution culturelle. Paris: Pluriel.
- Latouche, S. (2004). La mégamachine: Raison technoscientifique, raison économique et mythe du progrès ; essais à la mémoire de Jacques Ellul. Paris: Ed. La Découverte.
- Masci, F. (2023). Hors mode. Paris: Allia.
- McKinnon, A. M. (2013). Ideology and the Market Metaphor in Rational Choice Theory of Religion: A Rhetorical Critique of ‘Religious Economies’. Critical Sociology, 39(4), 529-543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920511415431
- Moore, H. L., Davies, M., Mintchev, N., & Woodcraft, S. (Eds.). (2023). Prosperity in the Twenty-First Century: Concepts, models and metrics. London: UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv33pb01p
- Simmel, G. (1957). Fashion. American Journal of Sociology, 62(6), 541-58.
- Simmel, G. (1911). Philosophie der Mode. Zur Psychologie der Mode: zwei Essays. Leipzig: Philosophische Kultur.
- Sombart, W. (1967). Capitalism and Luxury. English transl. by W. R. Dittmar. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
- Spadaro, A. and M. Figueroa (2017). Evangelical Fundamentalism and Catholic Integralism in the USA: A Surprising Ecumenism. La Civiltà Cattolica, 4010, 105-13.
- Veblen, Th. (1899), The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: The MacMillan Company.
- Vignoli, M., Roversi, S., Jatwani, C., Tiriduzzi, M. (2021) Human and Planet Centered Approach: Prosperity Thinking in Action. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED21), Gothenburg, Sweden, 16-20 August 2021.
- Vinken, B. (2005). Fashion Zeitgeist: Trends and Cycles in the Fashion System. Oxford: Berg. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780857854094
- Weber, M. (2000). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. English transl. by Talcott Parsons. London/New York: Routledge.