Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024)
Historical Articles

The Wonderful and the Useful: the Experiments in Samuel Parkes' Chemical Catechism

Raissa Martins Idalgo e Silva
University of São Paulo, Brasil
Bio
José Otavio Baldinato
Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of São Paulo (IFSP), Brasil
Bio
Paulo Alves Porto
University of São Paulo, Brasil
Bio

Published 2024-03-04

Keywords

  • Samuel Parkes,
  • Chemical Catechism,
  • 19th-century chemistry,
  • popularization of chemistry,
  • chemical experiments

How to Cite

Silva, R., Baldinato, J., & Porto, P. (2024). The Wonderful and the Useful: the Experiments in Samuel Parkes’ Chemical Catechism. Substantia, 8(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.36253/Substantia-2252

Abstract

This article aims to present an overview of the experiments contained in Samuel Parkes’ book, Chemical Catechism. In a context of great interest towards science in Britain, many popular chemistry books were published in the early 19th century. Among them, Chemical Catechism was a highly successful work, receiving several editions and translations into other languages. Its chemical content is presented in the form of short questions and answers, complemented by extensive footnotes that serve various purposes. One of these purposes was to guide the tutor in conducting demonstrations and experiments for the pupils, and to convince them of the practical nature of science. The experiments could have sensory, scientific, or industrial appeal, or could be integrated into discussions about theoretical aspects of chemistry. Analysis of the experiments reveals some of Parkes’ conceptions about chemistry and its popularization. Once the pupils’ attention had been captured by the experiments with great sensory appeal, the presentation of theoretical explanations would lead to an understanding of how chemists work and how chemistry could be useful for personal prosperity and the benefit of the nation.

References

  1. F. James, A. Peers, Physics in Perspective 2007, 9, 130-185; D. Knight in The Cambridge History of Science Volume 5: The Modern Physical and Mathematical Sciences (Ed. M. J. Nye), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002, p. 72-90.
  2. J. Golinski, Science as Public Culture: Chemistry and Enlightenment in Britain, 1760–1820, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999; Ref. 1 (Knight).
  3. J. O. Baldinato, P. A. Porto in Crossing Oceans: exchange of products, instruments and procedures in the history of chemistry and related sciences (Orgs.: A. M. Alfonso-Goldfarb, W. A. Carnielli, H. Chang, M. H. M. Ferraz, J. L. Goldfarb, S. Waisse), Unicamp/CLE, Campinas, 2015, p. 43-63; F. Kurzer, Annals of Science 1997, 54, 431-462.
  4. D. Knight, Ambix 1986, 33, 94-98; Ref. 1 (Knight); Ref. 3 (Kurzer); S. Parkes, A Chemical Catechism with copious notes, a vocabulary of chemical terms, useful tables, and a chapter of instructive and amusing experiments, 2. ed., Lackington, Allen, and Co., London, 1807, p. v.
  5. Ref. 4 (Parkes), p. v–x.
  6. Ref. 4 (Knight); Ref. 1 (Knight); D. Knight in The Public Image of Chemistry (Eds.: J. Schummer, B. Bensaude-Vincent, B. Van Tiggelen), World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2007, p. 123-136; D. Knight in Communicating Chemistry: textbooks and their audiences 1789–1939 (Eds.: A. Lundgren, B. Bensaude-Vincent), Science History Publications, Canton, 2009, vol. 1, p. 673-678; Ref. 1 (James, Peers); Ref. 3 (Kurzer); J. R. Topham, Isis 1998, 89, 233-262; J. R. Topham, Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A 2000, 31, 559-612; J. R. Topham in Popularizing Science and Technology in the European Periphery, 1800–2000 (Eds.: F. Papanelopoulou, A. Nieto-Galan, E. Perdiguero), Ashgate, Farnham, 2009, p. 1-20; J.-L. Chappey, Annales Historiques de la Révolution Française 2004, 338, 11-51; Ref. 2 (Golinski); B. Lightman, ed., Victorian Science in Context, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1997; B. Lightman in Victorian Popularizers of Science: Designing Nature for New Audiences, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 2007, 1-38.
  7. Ref. 6 (Knight, 2009).
  8. Ref. 6 (Knight, 2007).
  9. Ref. 1 (Knight).
  10. Ref. 1 (James, Peers); Ref. 1 (Knight).
  11. Ref. 1 (Knight), p. 74. For more on British and French science in this period, see D. Knight, The age of science, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1986, chapter 2.
  12. F. Kurzer, Annals of Science 2000, 57, 109-141.
  13. Ref. 6 (Knight, 2007; Knight, 2009).
  14. Ref. 1 (James, Peers), p. 141.
  15. B. Silliman, A journal of travels in England, Holland, and Scotland and of two passages over the Atlantic in the years 1805 and 1806 in two volumes, D. & G. Bruce, New York, 1810, vol. 1, p. 74, 259.
  16. L. Simond, Journal of a tour and residence in Great Britain, during the years 1810 and 1811, 2. ed., James Ballantyne and Co., Edinburgh, 1817, vol. 1, p. 43.
  17. Ref. 1 (James, Peers).
  18. Ref. 1 (Knight).
  19. Ref. 2 (Golinski).
  20. Ref. 2 (Golinski), p. 163.
  21. Ref. 2 (Golinski); Ref. 1 (Knight); I. Kramnick, The Journal of British Studies 1986, 25, 1-30.
  22. Ref. 6 (Topham, 2000).
  23. Ref. 1 (Knight).
  24. Ref. 4 (Knight); Ref. 1 (Knight); Ref. 6 (Lightman, 2007).
  25. Ref. 1 (Knight), p. 75.
  26. C. Brock, British Journal for the History of Science 2006, 39, 255–272; J. R. Issitt. Endeavour 2002, 26, 97-101; B. T. Gates, A. B. Shteir in Natural Eloquence: Women Reinscribe Science (Eds.: B. T. Gates, A. B. Shteir), The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1997, p. 3-24.
  27. Ref. 3 (Baldinato, Porto); Ref. 3 (Kurzer)
  28. Ref. 4 (Knight); Ref. 1 (Knight); Ref. 3 (Kurzer); J. O. Baldinato, Conhecendo a Química: Um estudo sobre obras de divulgação do início do século XIX, PhD Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil, 2015. Website: https://teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/81/81132/tde-21032016-113015/publico/Jose_Otavio_Baldinato.pdf , last accessed on 26/01/2023.
  29. Ref. 6 (Lightman, 2007).
  30. S. Parkes, The Chemical Catechism, with notes, illustrations, and experiments, 3. ed., Lackington, Allen, and Co., London, 1808, xii.
  31. J. W. Hodgetts, The Monthly Repository of Theology and General Literature 1826, 21, 120-121; Ref. 3 (Kurzer).
  32. Ref. 28 (Baldinato); Ref. 31 (Hodgetts); Ref. 3 (Kurzer).
  33. Ref. 31 (Hodgetts); Ref. 3 (Kurzer).
  34. Ref. 31 (Hodgetts); Ref. 3 (Kurzer).
  35. Ref. 31 (Hodgetts).
  36. Ref. 3 (Kurzer).
  37. S. Lee, Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, vol. LXIII, Macmillan and Co., New York, 1895, p. 307.
  38. Ref. 3 (Kurzer).
  39. S. Parkes A Chemical Catechism, 1. ed., Symonds, Hatchard, and Richardson, London, 1806; S. Parkes The Chemical Catechism, 5. ed., Lackington, Allen and Co., London, 1812; S. Parkes The Chemical Catechism, 12. ed., Baldwin, Cradock, and Joy, London, 1826.
  40. Ref. 3 (Baldinato, Porto); Ref. 4 (Knight); Ref. 3 (Kurzer); S. Parkes, “An Essay on the Utility of Chemistry to the Arts and Manufactures. Addressed to Parents in the higher and middle Ranks of Life,” in Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 1-22.
  41. J. O. Baldinato, P. A. Porto in Objetivos humanísticos, conteúdos científicos: contribuições da história e da filosofia da ciência para o ensino de ciências (Eds.: A. P. B. Silva, B. A. Moura), EDUEPB, Campina Grande, 2019, p. 131-177; W. Paley, Natural theology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006; R. M. I. Silva, O encontro da química e da religião na obra de Samuel Parkes, Undergraduate Monograph, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo, Brasil, 2015.
  42. See, for example: Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 27, 71, 104, 212, 242, 289, 375.
  43. S. Parkes, A Chemical Catechism: or the application of chemistry to the arts, for the use of young people, artists, tradesmen, and the amusement of leisure hours, James Humphreys, Philadelphia, 1807, p. 293.
  44. Ref. 43 (Parkes), p. 293-306.
  45. Ref. 43 (Parkes), p. xxvi.
  46. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 58.
  47. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 87.
  48. Caustic alkalies were potassium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide.
  49. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 162.
  50. Ref. 43 (Parkes), p. 293.
  51. Ref. 30 (Parkes), p. 592.
  52. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1826), p. 489-524.
  53. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 475. (Uppercase in original for this and the following quotations.)
  54. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 480.
  55. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 497.
  56. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 479.
  57. Ref. 6 (Knight, 2007), p. 126.
  58. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 475.
  59. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 253-254.
  60. Anon, The Monthly Review; or literary journal 1807, 53, 66.
  61. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 379.
  62. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 342.
  63. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 342.
  64. Ref. 43 (Parkes), p. 298.
  65. Ref. 4 (Parkes), p. 557.
  66. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 22.
  67. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 29.
  68. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 41.
  69. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 46.
  70. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 84.
  71. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 85.
  72. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 93.
  73. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 481.
  74. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 493.
  75. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 499.
  76. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 501.
  77. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 491-492.
  78. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 484.
  79. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 237.
  80. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 182-183.
  81. G. Riello, Journal of Global History 2010, 5, 1-28.
  82. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 1-22.
  83. Ref. 39 (Parkes, 1812), p. 487-488.