Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): To Shape: Order and Measure
Articles

Semantic Metadata and Lexical Standards for Architectural Heritage Documentation

Gireesh Kumar Thekkum Kara
University of Varanasi
Olimpia Niglio
University of Pavia

Published 2025-12-23

Keywords

  • Semantic metadata,
  • Lexical standardisation,
  • Digital Heritage,
  • 3D models,
  • Heritage Informatics

How to Cite

Kumar Thekkum Kara, G., & Niglio, O. (2025). Semantic Metadata and Lexical Standards for Architectural Heritage Documentation. TRIBELON Journal of Drawing and Representation of Architecture, Landscape and Environment, 2(4), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.36253/tribelon-3893

Abstract

Digital technologies are becoming increasingly essential for documenting, conserving, and disseminating knowledge of cultural heritage. A notable transition from traditional archival methods to advanced digital representations is evident, particularly in the context of cultural heritage data. Metadata, functioning as descriptive information, is crucial in systematically organising data generated while developing digital representations of cultural heritage structures. It consistently requires a comprehensive metadata schema to effectively display architectural structures with their contextual richness and the different technologies used. Widely adopted metadata standards provide essential descriptive metadata; however, they often lack specific fields needed to capture detailed administrative-technical data of 3D models – such as acquisition methods, geometric details, and accuracy metrics – elements crucial for assessing the authenticity and scholarly value of these digital representations. Such digital structures need precise information about the technologies and processes used in their creation to ensure accuracy and interoperability. This study examines the need for a more comprehensive metadata schema designed explicitly for 3D models of architectural heritage, emphasizing the importance of a lexical standardization approach to represent its multifaceted nature. 3D documentation techniques, such as photogrammetry and laser scanning, produce a large volume of complex and multilayered data whose management requires structured descriptive systems. The proposed metadata schema aims to standardize the extensive volume of supporting data generated by these methodologies, thereby facilitating the creation of semantically rich metadata that enhances the accessibility and retrieval of heritage information.

References

  1. M. Abdelalim, Heritage Preservation Using Laser Scanning: ArchitecturalDigital Twins Using Al-Mu'izz Street as a Case Study, in Buildings, XV, 2025, 9.
  2. Y. Abgaz, R. Rocha Souza, J. Methuku, G. Koch, A. Dorn, A Methodology for Semantic Enrichment of Cultural Heritage ImagesUsing Artificial Intelligence Technologies, in Journal of Imaging, VII, 2021, 8.
  3. R. Adam, F. Renaville, C. Oger (eds.), Opening Up OurHeritage: Opportunities in Digitising and Promoting Cultural and Research Collections, Presses Universitaires de Liège, Liège 2025.
  4. N. Amico, A. Felicetti, 3D Data Long-Term Preservation in Cultural Heritage, arXiv preprint, 2024.
  5. I. Bajena, P. Kuroczyński, Metadata for 3D Digital HeritageModels: In the Search of a Common Ground, in Workshop on Research andEducation in Urban History in the Age of Digital Libraries, SpringerNature, Switzerland 2023, pp. 45-64.
  6. D. Belteki, A. J. Rees, A. M. Sichani, Datafication andCultural Heritage Collections Data Infrastructures: Critical Perspectives onDocumentation, Cataloguing and Data-Sharing in Cultural Heritage Institutions, in Journal of Open Humanities Data, XI, 2025, 1.
  7. J. Blundell, J. L. Clark, K. E. DeVet, J. L. Hardesty, Metadata Requirements for 3D Data, in J. Moore, A. Rountrey, K.Scates, 3D Data Creation to Curation: CommunityStandards for 3D Data Preservation, pp. 157 -204.
  8. A. J. Gilliland, Setting the Stage, in M. Baca (edited by) Introduction to Metadata, 3rd ed., Getty Publications, Los Angeles 2016, pp. 1-20.
  9. D. Green, A View from the Top: A Special Message for Administrators ofCultural Heritage Collections, in E. Lanzi (edited by) Introduction to Vocabularies: Enhancing Access to Cultural Heritage Information, US 1998.
  10. L. Hollink, M. Van Assem, S. Wang, A. Isaac, G. Schreiber, Two variations on ontology alignment evaluation: Methodological issues, in European Semantic Web Conference, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2008, pp. 388-401.
  11. T. Homburg, A. Cramer, L. Raddatz, H. Mara, Metadata schema and ontology for capturing and processing of 3D cultural heritage objects, in HeritageScience, IX, 2021, 1, pp. 1-19.
  12. R. Iannella, A. Waugh, Metadata: enabling the Internet, DSTC PtyLimited, 1997.
  13. ICOM-CIDOC LIDO Working Group, 2024. LIDO Primer, version 1.1. Accessed September 11, 2024. https://lido-schema.org/documents/primer/2024-09-11/lido-primer.html.
  14. P-D. Lam, B-H. Gu, H-K. Lam, S-Y. Ok, S-H. Lee, Digital Twin Smart City: Integrating IFC and CityGML with SemanticGraph for Advanced 3D City Model Visualization, in Sensors, 24, 2024, XII.
  15. J. Lutteroth, P. Kuroczyński, I. P. Bajena, Digital 3D Reconstructions of Synagogues for an Innovative Approach on Jewish Architectural Heritage in East Central Europe, in Virtual Archaeology Review, XVI, 2024, 32, pp.144 -160.
  16. M. Miłosz, J. Kęsik, J. Montusiewicz, Three-Dimensional Digitization of Documentation and Perpetual Preservation of Cultural Heritage-Buildings at Risk of Liquidation and Loss – The Methodology and Case Study of St.Adalbert’s Church in Chicago, in Electronics, XIII, 2024, 3.
  17. J. Moyano, A. Pili, J. E. Nieto-Julián, S. Della Torre, S. Bruno, Semantic Interoperability for Cultural Heritage Conservation: Workflow from Ontologies to a Tool for Managing and Sharing Data, in Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 80.
  18. I. Muñoz-Pandiella, C. Bosch, M. Guardia, B. Cayuela, P. Pogliani, G. Bordi, M. Paschali, C. Andujar, P. Charalambous, Digital 3D Models for Medieval Heritage: Diachronic Analysis and Documentation of Its Architecture and Paintings, in Personal and Ubiquitous Computing XXVIII, 2024, 3, pp. 521 -547.
  19. J. Park, Y. Tosaka, Metadata creation practices in digital repositoriesand collections: Schemata, selection criteria, and interoperability, in Information Technology and Libraries, XXIX, 2010, 3, pp. 104-116.
  20. M-E. Polo, G. Duran-Domínguez, A. M. Felicísimo, Proposal of Metadata Schema for Capturing and Processing 3D Models in anArchaeological Context, in Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 2024, 34.
  21. P. Ronzino, F. Niccolucci, A. D'Andrea, Built Heritage metadata schemas and the integration of architectural datasets using CIDOC-CRM, in Online proceedings of the International Conference Built Heritage, 2013.
  22. P. Ronzino, N. Amico, F. Niccolucci, Assessment and Comparison of Metadata Schemas for Architectural Heritage, in Proceedings of CIPA, 2011, pp. 71 -78.
  23. Samvera, Technical Metadata Application Profile, 2025. Accessed October 9, 2025.
  24. A. Shiri, S. Chase‐Kruszewski, Knowledge organisation systems in North American digital library collections, in Program, XLIII, 2009, 2, pp. 121-139.
  25. A. L. Silva, A. L. Terra, Cultural Heritage on the Semantic Web: The Europeana Data Model, in IFLA Journal, L, 2024, 1, pp. 93–107.
  26. M. Skublewska-Paszkowska, M. Miłosz, P. Powroźnik, E. Łukasik, 3D Technologies for Intangible Cultural Heritage Preservation -Literature Review for Selected Databases, in Heritage Science, X, 2022, 3.
  27. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. 2025. Initiative on Heritage of Religious Interest. https://whc.unesco.org/en/religious-sacred-heritage/.
  28. UNESCO Charter on the Preservation of the Digital Heritage, 2009. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000179529.
  29. Y. Xiucheng, P. Grussenmeyer, M. Koehl, H. Macher, A. Murtiyoso, T. Landes, Review of Built Heritage Modelling: Integrationof HBIM and Other Information Techniques, in Journal of Cultural Heritage 2020, 46, pp. 350 -360.
  30. A. Zachos, C-N. Anagnostopoulos, Using TLS, UAV, and MR Methodologies for 3D Modelling and Historical Recreation of Religious Heritage Monuments, in ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage XVII, 2025, 4, pp. 1 -23.
  31. H. Zhao, Digital Pathways to the Past: Reconstructing the Historiographic Landscape of Medieval Church Documents through Digital Archives, Master Degree thesis, 2025.
  32. L. Zhou, L. Xue, W. Wei, The Emotional Foundations of Value Co-Creation in Sustainable Cultural Heritage Tourism: Insights into the Motivation-Experience-Behavior Framework, in Sustainability, XVII, 2025, 15.