Negotiating Fashion Discourses in Craft Contexts: Adaptive Co-Creation and Agency in the Vietnam Design Research Studio
Donna Cleveland- Corinna Joyce
- Peter Cleveland
- Matthias Waldhart
- Kristina Rylander
- Hanh Nguyen
Published 30-06-2026
Keywords
- Sustainable fashion discourse,
- Co-creation,
- Tacit knowledge,
- Adaptive design,
- Traditional crafts
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2026 Donna Cleveland, Corinna Joyce, Peter Cleveland, Matthias Waldhart, Kristina Rylander, Hanh Nguyen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This paper examines how heritage, innovation, and sustainability are negotiated between academic researchers and textile artisans in Hoa Tien, a Vietnamese craft village participating in the Vietnam Design Research Studio. The pilot study initially sought to co-create a digital platform to document local weaving practices. However, fieldwork revealed significant gaps between academic vocabularies of preservation, digital futures, and sustainable design, and the artisans’ tacit, embodied, and livelihood-oriented knowledge systems.
Using participatory action research and ethnographic methods, the study shows how textile craft operates within fashion as a cultural, economic, and discursive system. Artisans framed their practice through ancestral motifs, intergenerational transmission, and economic pragmatism, while researchers emphasised documentation, innovation, and future-oriented sustainability. These divergent discourses exposed the limits of conventional co-design models that assume shared language, symmetrical knowledge, or common goals.
The paper reframes co-creation as an adaptive, semiotic, and discursive process shaped by language, epistemology, and situated practice. By foregrounding these negotiations, it contributes to debates on how alternative fashion languages emerge from the margins and how they might inform more inclusive and context-sensitive approaches to sustainable fashion futures.
References
- Barthes, R. (1967). Système de la mode. Éditions du Seuil.
- Bissett-Johnson, K. and Moorhead, D. J. (2019). Co-creating craft; Australian designers meet artisans in India. Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings. https://doi.
- org/10.32873/unl.dc.tsasp.0004
- Choudhary, A. (2023). Adaptation of tribal art of Central Western India for the development of textile products using digital design software. Shodhkosh Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i2.2023.726
- Espinosa, P., Cortes Rodríguez, N. C., & Socha López, J. C. (2024). Social innovation for conserving textile-craft practices in boyacá, colombia. Apuntes Del Cenes, 43(77), 153-178. https://doi.org/10.19053/uptc.01203053.v43.n77.2024.16248
- Groth, C. and Berg, A. (2018). Co-creation in professional craft practice. Proceedings of DRS, 4. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.256
- Guo, J. and Ahn, B. (2023). Tacit knowledge sharing for enhancing the sustainability of intangible cultural heritage (ich) crafts: a perspective from artisans and academics under craft–design collaboration. Sustainability, 15(20), 14955. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014955
- Ingold, T 2013, ‘Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture’, Routledge.
- Jansen, M. A. (2020). Fashion and the phantasmagoria of modernity: An introduction to decolonial fashion discourse. Fashion Theory, 24(6), 815-836. https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704X.2020.1802098
- Kettle, A. (2019). Textile and Place. TEXTILE, 17(4), 332–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759756.2019.1639413
- Lotman, Y. M. (1991). Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture (A. Shukman, Trans.). I. B. Tauris. (Original work published 1990).
- Madden, D., Cadet-James, Y., Atkinson, I., & Watkin Lui, F. (2014). Probes and prototypes: a participatory action research approach to codesign. CoDesign, 10(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.881884
- Mazzarella, F., Escobar-Tello, M. C., & Mitchell, V. (2016). Moving textile artisans’ communities towards a sustainable future – a theoretical framework. Proceedings of DRS, 10. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2016.140
- Mazzarella, F., May, A., & Mitchell, V. (2021). A methodological framework for crafting situated services. Journal of Service Management, 32(5), 752-782. https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-05-2020-0188
- O’Connell, M. (2023). Natural Practices: The Creative Autonomy Encoded within First Nations Dye and Weaving Processes of the Chilkat Blanket. TEXTILE, 21(1), 208-223.
- Portillo, H. E., & Navarro Delgado, H. (2018). Empowering Indigenous Mexican groups through fostering the practice of traditional textile crafts. In Proceedings of the International Textile and Apparel Association Annual Conference (Vol. 75, No. 1). Iowa State University Digital Press. https://iastatedigitalpress.com/itaa/article/1256/galley/1129/view/
- Rocamora, A. (2009). Fashioning the city: Paris, fashion and the media. Bloomsbury.
- Shin, M. J., & Westland, S. (2017). Digitizing Traditional Cultural Designs. The Design Journal, 20(5), 639–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1349725
- Zabulis, X., Meghini, C., Dubois, A., Doulgeraki, P., Partarakis, N., Adami, I., Karuzaki, E., Carré, A.-L., Patsiouras, N., Kaplanidi, D., Metilli, D., Bartalesi, V., Ringas, C., Tasiopoulou, E., & Stefanidi, Z. (2022). Digitisation of traditional craft processes. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 15(3), Article 53. https://doi.org/10.1145/3494675