Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023)
Historical Articles

Martin Heinrich Klaproth (1743-1817), a Great, Somewhat Forgotten, Chemist

Juergen Heinrich Maar
Retired, Department of Chemistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
Bio

Published 2023-07-03

Keywords

  • History of Chemistry,
  • Martin Heinrich Klaproth,
  • History of Analytical Chemistry,
  • History of the Discovery of the Elements,
  • Mineral and Mineral Water Analyses,
  • Archaeometry
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Maar, J. H. (2023). Martin Heinrich Klaproth (1743-1817), a Great, Somewhat Forgotten, Chemist. Substantia, 7(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.36253/Substantia-2125

Abstract

For various reasons, some of them linked to the evolution of the historiography of Chemistry, many recognized and important chemists in their time – and in ours, because of the legacy they left – are relegated to some degree of oblivion. One of these chemists, dead just over 200 years ago, is Martin Heinrich Klaproth (1743-1817), a key figure in the transition from phlogiston theory to Lavoisier’s new chemistry and one of the creators of modern analytical chemistry, an empiricist who discovered many elements and polymorphism, author of remarkable chemical and mineralogical analyses and creator of archaeometry. This article presents the life, training and scientific production of a great, but less remembered, chemist, crossing the frontiers of Chemistry in many cases.

References

  1. Bugge, G;. “Das Buch der Grossen Chemiker”, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 1979 [Berlin, 1929], vol. 1.
  2. Dann, G. E., “Martin Heinrich Klaproth (1743-1817). Ein Deutscher Apotheker und Chemiker. Sein Weg und seine Leistungen”, Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1958, p. 72.
  3. Engel, B., “Martin Heinrich Klaproth: Chemie, nach den Abschriften von Stephan Friedrich Barez und Arthur Schopenhauer”, Mitteilungen, Gesellschaft Deutscher Chemiker. Fachgruppe Geschichte der Chemie, 1989, 3, 27-37.
  4. Schwedt, G., “Vom Harz nach Berlin – Martin Heinrich Klaproth”, BooksonDemand, 2016.
  5. Kraft, A., Jahrbuch des Vereins für die Geschichte Berlins, 2008, 58, 9-24;
  6. Scurla, H., “Wilhelm Von Humboldt”, Heyne-Verlag, Munich, 1984, p. 349.
  7. Ihde, A., “The Development of Modern Chemistry”. Dover Publications, New York, 1984, pp. 25-32.
  8. Homburg, E., “The Rise of Analytical Chemistry and its Consequences for the Development of the German Chemical Profession (1780-1860)”, Ambix, 1999, 46, 1-32;
  9. Klaproth, M. H., from the notes of A. Schopenhauer, apud Engel, B., op. cit., p. 35.
  10. Klaproth, M. H., from the notes of S. Barez, apud Engel, B., op. cit., p. 35.
  11. Engel, B., op. cit., 30-31.
  12. Engel, B., op. cit., 34-35.
  13. Klaproth, M. H., “Chemische Untersuchung des Uranits, einer neuentdeckten metallischen Substanz”, Ann. Chem., part 2, 1789, pp. 387-403.
  14. Maar, J, H., “História da Química”, volume I, Conceito Editorial, Florianópolis, 2008, p. 537.
  15. Szabadváry, F., Periodica Polytechnica Chem. Eng.,, 1982, 26, 143-147.
  16. Klaproth, M. H., “Beiträge zur Chemischen Kenntnis der Mineralkörper”, Decker & Co., H. A. Rottmann, Posen and Berlin, 1796-1815, vol. IV, pp. 140-154.
  17. Klaproth, M. H., Beiträge, vol. I, pp. 97-102.
  18. Seybert, H., Annals of Philosophy, 1824, 7, 427-432.
  19. Klaproth, M. H., apud Schwedt, G., p. 94.
  20. Klaproth, M. H., Beiträge, vol. I, pp. 103-111.
  21. Klaproth, M. H., Beiträge, vol. III, pp. 207-214.
  22. Klaproth, M. H., Beiträge, vol. IV, pp. 360-365.
  23. Klaproth, M. H., Beiträge, vol. II, pp. 12-15.
  24. Klaproth, M. H., Beiträge, vol. IV, pp. 160-178.
  25. Klaproth, M. H., Beiträge vol. ii, 151-154.
  26. Klaproth, M. H., Beiträge, vol. II, pp. 22-24.
  27. Klaproth, M. H., Beiträge, vol. IV, pp. 204-223.
  28. Klaproth, M. H., Beiträge, vol. I, pp. 189-196
  29. Klaproth, M. H., Beiträge, vol. IV, pp. 350-353
  30. Klaproth, M. H., Beiträge, vol. II, pp. 39-51.
  31. Fontani, M., Costa, M., Orna, M., “The Lost Elements”, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 3-4.
  32. Klaproth, M. H., “Untersuchung des Guanos von den peruanischen Inseln”, Beiträge, vol. IV, pp. 299-
  33. Klaproth, M. H., “Untersuchung der ‘Pacos’ aus Peru”, Beiträge, vol. IV, pp. 4-9.
  34. Klaproth, M. H., “Untersuchung des ‘Moya’ aus Quito”, Beiträge, vol. IV, pp. 289-298.
  35. Baudisch, O., “Magic and Science of Natural Healing Waters”, J. Chem. Educ., 1939, 16, 440-448.
  36. Klaproth, M. H., Beiträge, vol. I, p. 322
  37. Berzelius, J. J., Annalen der Physik (Gilbert), 1823, 74, 113-211;
  38. Nissenbaum, A., “Chemical Analyses of Dead Sea and Jordan River Water”,Israel Journal of Chemistry, 1970, 8, 281-287. Oren, A., “Qualitative and Quantitative Chemical Analyses of Dead Sea Water in the 18th and 19th Century”, Israel Journal of Chemistry, 2006, 46, 69-77.
  39. Gliemann, T., “Geographische Beschreibung von Island”, J. Hämmerich, Altona, 1824, pp. 59-60.
  40. Bartel, H., “Martin Heinrich Klaproth und die Archäometrie”, Berliner Beiträge zur Archäometrie, 25, 119-136 (2017).
  41. Pollard, A., “The first hundred years of archaeometallurgical chemistry: Pownall (1775) to von Bibra
  42. (1869)”, Historical Metallurgy, 2015, 49, 37-49.
  43. Schütt, H. W., ”Martin Heinrich Klaproth als Archäometer”, Chemie in unserer Zeit, 1989, 23, 50-52. Caley, E.,” The Early History of Chemistry in Service of Archaeology”, J. Chem. Educ., 1967, 44, 120-127.
  44. Caley, E., “Klaproth as a pioneer in the chemical investigation of antiquities”, J. Chem. Educ., 1949, 26, 251-257.
  45. Bibra, E. v., “Die Bronzen und Kupferlegierungen der alten und ältesten Völker”, Ferdinand Enke, Erlangen, 1869, pp. 52-58.
  46. Data adapted from Bartels, op. cit., p. 127.
  47. Data from Bartels, op. cit., p. 46.
  48. Schütt, H. W., op. cit., p. 51.
  49. Klaproth, M. H., “Über antike Glaspasten”, Abhand. Königl. Akad. Wiss., 1798, pp. 34, 35, 37.
  50. Klaproth, M. H., Beiträge, vol. IV, pp. 1-3.
  51. Klaproth, M. H., Beiträge, vol. IV, pp. 327-333.
  52. Caley, E., “The early history of Chemistry in the Service of Archaeology”, J. Chem. Educ., 1967, 44, 120-127.
  53. Gilman, M., “Friedrich Rathgen: the Father of Modern Archaeological Conservation”, Journal of the American Institute of Conservation, 1987, 26, 105-120.
  54. Klaproth, M. H., Beiträge, vol. III, pp. 114-134.
  55. Krünitz, J. G., Oekonomische Encyclopaedie, part 43, Joseph Trassler, Brünn, 1790, pp. 710-760.
  56. Engel, B., op. cit., pp. 30-31.
  57. Klaproth, M. H., “Chemische Abhandlungen gemischten Inhalts”, Nikolaische Buchhandlung, Berlin and Stettin, 1815.
  58. Klaproth, M. H., Chemische Abhandlungen, pp. 21-60 (five papers)
  59. Klaproth, M. H., Chemische Abhandlungen, pp. 1-15.
  60. Klaproth, M. H., Chemische Abhandlungen, pp. 209-308.
  61. Ihde, A. “The Development of Modern Chemistry”, Dover Publications, New York, 1964, pp.290-291.
  62. Friedrich, C., Pharmazeutische Zeitung, 2016, 51/52
  63. Hufbauer, K., “The Formation of the German Chemical Community”, University of California, 1970.
  64. Thomson, T., “The History of Chemistry”, vol. II (reprint of the 1830/1831 edition), H. Coburn & R. Bentley, London, pp. 135-136.
  65. Reis, J., “A História e o Ensino da Ciência”, Revista de História, 1967, 34, 3-13.
  66. Ledermann, E., “Les pharmaciens suisses et la science: une autre histoire de la pharmacie helvétique”, Anal. Real Acad. Farm., 2000, 66.