Just Accepted Manuscripts
Historical Articles

Chemical Terms in History: Polysemy and Meaning Transfers

PDF (Just Accepted)
  • Helge Kragh
Helge Kragh
Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/Substantia-2444

Published 2024-03-27

Keywords

  • history of chemistry,
  • language,
  • words,
  • radical,
  • bromide,
  • semantic shifts,
  • DNA
    • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Kragh, H. (2024). Chemical Terms in History: Polysemy and Meaning Transfers. Substantia. https://doi.org/10.36253/Substantia-2444

Copyright (c) 2024 Helge Kragh

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The vocabulary of the chemical sciences consists in part of words and phrases many of which are of a technical nature while others are derived from or related to everyday language. Many of the words are so-called polysemes, that is, they are used with different meanings either in common language or in the technical language of other sciences. The study of the origin and migration (or transfer) of words in science provides additional insights in how science has developed historically and interacted with the cultural domain. One type of word migration is between the scientific and socio-cultural domains, while another is restricted to the transfer between different scientific disciplines or sub-disciplines. This paper discusses and exemplifies a select number of chemically related words and phrases from a historical perspective. Among them are commonly known words such as ‘radical,’ ‘catalyze,’ and ‘litmus test’ which are used not only as technical terms in chemistry but also, in figurative and metaphorical senses, in everyday language.

PDF (Just Accepted)

References

  1. L. Hogben, The Vocabulary of Science, Stein and Day, New York 1970, p. 28. J. Golinski, The chemical revolution and the politics of language, Eighteenth Century: Theory Interpret. 1992, 33, 238-251.
  2. C. Van Dyke, Old words for new worlds: Modern scientific and technological word-formation, Amer. Speech 1992, 67, 383-405.
  3. H. Kragh, The Names of Science: Terminology and Language in the History of the Natural Sciences, to be published by Oxford University Press in July 2024. This paper relies in part on the forthcoming book.
  4. C. Mönch and S. Markic, Exploring pre-service chemistry teachers’ pedagogical scientific language knowledge, Educ. Sciences 2022, 12, 244-259.
  5. J. N. Ryan, The language gap: Common words with technical meanings, J. Chem. Educ. 1985, 62, 1098-1099.
  6. L. Cerruti, The mole, Amedeo Avogadro and others, Metrologia 1994, 31, 159-166.
  7. E. Hamori and J. E. Muldrey, Use of the word ‘eager’ instead of ‘spontaneous’ for the description of exergonic reactions, J. Chem. Educ. 1984, 61, 710.
  8. H. Kragh, The names of physics: Plasma, fission, photon, Eur. Phys. J. H 2014, 39, 262-282.
  9. H. Kragh, Chain reaction: A chemical word and its history, paper accepted for publication in Bull. Hist. Chem.
  10. H. A. M. Snelders, Dissociation, Darwinism and entropy: A case-study from the history of physical chemistry, Janus 1977, 64, 51-75. H. Kragh, Julius Thomsen: A Life in Chemistry and Beyond, Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, Copenhagen 2016, pp. 279-281.
  11. W. Crookes, On the nature and origin of the so-called elements, Report, Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci. 1886, 558-572. W. H. Brock, From Protyle to Proton: William Prout and the Nature of Matter, 1785-1985, Adam Hilger, Bristol 1985.
  12. P. A. Srerer, The metabolon, Trends Biochem. Sci. 1985, 10, 109-110. E. Rutherford and F. Soddy, Radioactive change, Philos. Mag. 1903, 5, 576-591.
  13. A. Robinson, The Last Man Who Knew Everything, Plume Book, New York 2007, p. 125. C. Smith, The Science of Energy: A Cultural History of Energy Physics in Victorian Britain, Athlone Press, London 1998, p. 8.
  14. W. Blake, The Marriage of Heaven and Hell, online as https://www.gutenberg.org/files/45315/45315-h/45315-h.htm. For ‘energy’ in Victorian poetry and literature, see B. J. Gold, ThermoPoetics: Energy in Victorian Literature and Science, MIT Press, Cambridge MA 2010.
  15. E. Phillips, The New World of Words, or, a General Dictionary, compiled by J. Kersey, London 1720. Accessible as Google Book.
  16. Quoted in H. Kragh, Entropic Creation: Religious Contexts of Thermodynamics and Cosmology, Ashgate, Aldershot 2008, p. 25.
  17. Smith, Science of Energy (ref. 13), p. 2.
  18. P. Hjertholm, A History of the Cultural Travels of Energy: From Aristotle to the OED, Routledge, New York 2023.
  19. W. H. Brock, The Norton History of Chemistry, Norton & Company, New York 1993, p. 178. W. Eamon, Robert Boyle and the discovery of chemical indicators, Ambix 1980, 27, 204-209. A. A. Baker, A history of indicators, Chymia 1964, 9, 147-167.
  20. H. Davy, An account of some experiments on the constituent parts of certain astringent vegetables; and on their operation in tanning, Philos. Trans. 1802, 98, 233-273, p. 246.
  21. https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/litmus-test; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litmus_test_(politics)
  22. J. Habermas, Berkeley J. Sociol. 1985, 30, 95-116.
  23. K. W. Watkins, Chemical metaphors, J. Chem. Educ. 1989, 66, 1020.
  24. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/2175/2175-h/2175-h.htm
  25. Phillips, New World of Words, ref. (15).
  26. T. L. Levere, Affinity and Matter: Elements of Chemical Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1971. A. M. Duncan, Laws and Order in Eighteenth-Century Chemistry, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1996. M. J. Nye, From Chemical Philosophy to Theoretical Chemistry, University of California Press, Berkeley 1993, pp. 71-81, 116-122.
  27. OED. W. R. Morse, “Stanford expressions,” Amer. Speech 1927, 2, 274-279.
  28. https://www.good-chemistry.com/products/magnolia-violet-perfume
  29. M. P. Crosland, Historical Studies in the Language of Chemistry, Dover Publications, New York 1978.
  30. https://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/106096. OED, entry ‘oxygen.’
  31. W. Hammond, The therapeutics of wakefulness, Sci. American 1869 (August), 20, 115.
  32. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bromo-Seltzer
  33. For details, see S. Lamb, (Not) a bromide story: Myth-busting bromide of potassium to create a case study of change and continuity in nineteenth-century medicine, J. Pharmacy and Pharmaceuticals 2018, 60, 108-123.
  34. B. Gelett, Are You a Bromide? Online: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/10870. On Burgess as a prolific but unserious coiner of new words, see A. Metcalf, Predicting New Words: The Secrets of Their Success, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston 2002, pp. 36-38 and R. Keyes, The Hidden Story of Coined Words, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2021, pp. 171-173.
  35. K. Gavroglu and A. Simões, Neither Physics nor Chemistry: A History of Quantum Chemistry, MIT Press, Cambridge MA 2012, pp. 61-64, 81-87.
  36. Letter from Pauling to Coulson of 1952 cited in K. Gavroglu and A. Simões, Quantum chemistry qua applied mathematics. The contributions of Charles Alfred Coulson, Hist. Stud. Phys. Biol. Sci. 1999, 29, 363-406, p. 399. For a detailed history of hybridization in the sense of quantum chemistry, see G. Lamoureux and J. F. Ogilvie, A critical history of hybrid atomic orbitals and hybridization, J. Chem. Rev. 2022, 4, 120-146.
  37. R. S. Mulliken, Bonding power of electrons and theory of valence, Chem. Rev. 1931, 9, 347-388. Received 5 October 1931.
  38. M. J. Nye, Physical and biological modes of thought in the chemistry of Linus Pauling, Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 2000, 31, 475-491.
  39. For the latter term, see W. B. Jensen, The origin of the polymer concept, J. Chem. Educ. 2008, 85, 624-625.
  40. For a careful history of catalytic effects in the development of chemical thought, see B. Linström and L. Pettersson, A brief history of catalysis, CATTECH 2003, 7, 130-138.
  41. Translated from German in J. R. Partington, A History of Chemistry, vol. 4, Macmillan & Co., London 1964, p. 263.
  42. J. R. Partington, A History of Chemistry, vol. 2, Macmillan & Co., London 1961, p. 254. Linström and Pettersson, A brief history of catalysis, (ref. 40).
  43. Words, words, words, Amer. Speech 1944, 19, 150.
  44. E. C. Constable, and C. E. Housecroft, Before radicals were free – the radical particulier of de Morveau, Chemistry 2020, 2, 1-11. See also the old but still useful review by the German-American chemist Moses Gomberg, who in the late 1890s was the first to present evidence for the existence of free radicals. M. Gomberg, Radicals in chemistry, past and present, Ind. Engineer. Chem. 1928, 20, 159-164.
  45. A.-L. Lavoisier, Elements of Chemistry, trans. Robert Kerr, Dover Publications, New York 1965, p. 175.
  46. Quoted in Brock, History of Chemistry (ref. 19), p. 211.
  47. A. J. Ihde, The history of free radicals and Moses Gomberg’s contributions, Pure Appl. Chem. 1967, 15, 1-14.
  48. G. Cannon, Abbreviations and acronyms in English word-formation, Amer. Speech 1989, 64, 99-127.
  49. S. S. Cohen, The electrophoretic mobilities of desoxyribose and ribose nucleic acids, J. Biol. Chem. 1942, 146, 471-473.
  50. J. D. Watson and F. H. Crick, Molecular structure of nucleic acids. A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid, Nature 1953, 171, 737-738.
  51. A. E. Mirsky, The discovery of DNA, Sci. Amer. 1968 (June), 218, 78-90. E. Lamm, O. Harman, and S. J. Veigl, Before Watson and Crick came Friedrich Miescher in 1869, Genetics 2020, 215, 78-90.
  52. A. Barnett and Z. Doubleday, Meta-research: The growth of acronyms in the scientific literature, eLife 2020, 9, e60080.
  53. OED, https://www.oed.com/information/understanding-entries/frequency
  54. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2015/06/22/obama-is-right-about-the-n-word-and-racism/
  55. https://www.dazeddigital.com/beauty/article/43781/1/perfume-designer-translating-personality-dna-fragrance
  56. K. J. Laidler, The World of Physical Chemistry, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1993, pp. 206-211.